Introduction
Psychotherapy and counseling are regarded as exceptionally important helping professions in the modern world. It can assist people, groups, organizations, and communities maximize their well-being in addition to treating mental diseases. There has recently been an upsurge in the number of research and publications proving the application of neurobiological knowledge in treatment. Every branch of neuroscience has something to contribute to our developing understanding of how the neuronal architecture of the brain interacts with and influences mental health and makes valuable contributions to the effectiveness of psychotherapy and counseling.
A better understanding of the neuronal structure of the brain and mind allows psychotherapists and psychologists to improve the complexity and effectiveness of their therapy. An assessment of current research, literature, and conversation surrounding the neurology of emotions, in particular, has the potential to improve the communication and efficacy of counseling psychologists in the workplace. This shows that by integrating neuroscience and counseling psychology, a broad range of therapeutic and research advantages might be realized. It is advisable that the first step in studying the paradigm of integrating neuroscience into counseling psychology is to study the available literature on this topic in order to understand the current situation and determine the existing scientific knowledge on the topic of cognitive and affective neuroscience. The reviewed literature will then be critically analyzed and evaluated, identifying key findings as well as problems and gaps in existing knowledge. In conclusion, the main findings of the literature review are summarized, with an evaluative statement of current perspectives on neuroscience as applied to the consulting profession. The main gaps and shortcomings in the study of the topic are also identified, and directions for further study are outlined.
Literature Review
To determine the current scientific knowledge on the topic, it is appropriate to begin the literature review with a source that provides an overview of the history of emotion neuroscience research over the last century. Barrett and Satpute (2019) present primary research and theories over the last century, highlighting the main themes that run through different schools of thought and outlining the field’s current state. The neurobiological study of emotions began in the 19th century when scientists were looking for the physical basis of fear, anger, sadness, and other mental categories (Barrett & Satpute, 2019). They could not identify a specific neural circuit or set of autonomic nervous system changes that would consistently distinguish one category of emotion from another. In the 1970s and 1980s, psychologists’ views of the brain were dominated by the so-called “triune brain” model (Barrett & Satpute, 2019). Scientists nowadays confront the same challenges that they did a century ago. Neuroscientific investigations of emotion have been unable to separate and differentiate the precise brain substrate of a mental category.
As for the current state, a growing number of brain imaging studies have successfully distinguished emotion categories using multivariate patterns of activity distributed across the brain. A focus on understanding the dynamics of network integration that creates the brain states that implement individual emotional events. Recent models suggest that the brain functions as a Bayesian filter for incoming sensory input (Barrett & Satpute, 2019). This study is deep and thorough in the context of exploring all existing models and theories in the neuroscience of emotions, as it covers key studies of the last century, analyzes them, and identifies key problems and limitations. The researchers believe that one way ahead is to abandon emotional terms and focus solely on variable occurrences. The capacity to generate categories is required for induction and generalizability. The issue is not one of defining a category but of essentializing the category.
Understanding the biology of emotions is essential to working effectively and safely with them. Adolphs and Anderson (2018) redefine the field and show that understanding emotions in humans and animals involves investigating their biological underpinnings. Their approach to the study of neuroscience is that one can only understand what emotions do, how they originated, and how the brain impacts their evolution by using a comparative approach that includes study at the molecular, cellular, systemic, and cognitive levels. Adolfs and Anderson provide a wide framework for thinking about emotions as evolved, functionally defined biological states by demonstrating that emotions are ubiquitous across animals and are realized in particular brain circuits. Emotion neuroscience contends that researching how emotions manifest in the brain might offer a better understanding of their functions (Adolphs & Anderson, 2018). The study of how the brain regulates cognition, behavior, and emotions, as well as how it responds to physical or mental sickness, injury, and substance addiction, is known as modern neuroscience. These mechanics can be useful in psychotherapy and counseling. It can also advise on which counseling tactics work best in given scenarios. The validation of what is most apparent to psychotherapists by neuroscience provides an unparalleled path ahead for enhancing the practice. This also allows for a more effective separation of proven ineffectual or even hazardous approaches.
It is critical for a psychotherapist and counselor to understand not only the mechanics of emotion emergence and genesis but also their long-term influence on bodily systems. The work of Alexander et al. (2021) is excellent research in this field, as it investigates the neurophysiological correlates of pleasant emotions and the effects that together lead to happiness and well-being. According to the researchers, the neurophysiological mechanisms that generate good emotions are dynamic and variable (Alexander et al., 2021). Positive emotions improve psychological and physical well-being in a variety of ways, including the regulation of neurophysiological correlates in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Meditation and flow states have been shown to modify brain working patterns and, as a result, improve well-being (Alexander et al., 2021). Excessive happiness and good emotions, on the other hand, can have detrimental repercussions on psychological well-being; for example, having excessive pleasant emotions is linked to bipolar illness. Thus, experiencing a variety of pleasant and negative emotions is linked to better health outcomes.
Emotions are fundamental to psychotherapy, counseling practice, and knowledge of the human mind and social connections. However, no scientific consensus exists on the underlying nature of emotions. Fox et al. (2018) in the article present a brief review of emotional scientific research, with a particular emphasis on the psychological and neurological components of affective neuroscience. The authors examine the studies in this field and conclude that there is no agreement in affective science about the underlying basis of emotions. Many researchers believe that emotions are naturally programmed to assist humans in navigating the environment. Others contend that social constructions come from the brain’s dynamic structure and a highly developed conceptual framework. They identify that there are seven primary emotional systems that are evolutionarily ancient and act in similar ways across species: search, anger, fear, wish, caring, panic, and game. Anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and happiness are commonly regarded as “fundamental” in the sense that they are “natural species” that exist in nature. According to the researchers, social engagement increases the brain’s reward circuitry and the release of dopamine and oxytocin, neurotransmitters that improve motivation, feelings of well-being, and attachment and trust levels. This research emphasizes the significance of the counselor-client relationship, which is linked to the counselor’s empathy.
Neuroscience identifies and explores emotions as functional states distinct from feelings. Understanding these differences can be helpful in the practice of psychotherapy and counseling. Adolphs & Andler (2018) explore a functionalist approach to emotion that focuses on emotion as a central state that has causal relationships with behavior and other cognitive states. The authors contend that emotions, like attention, memory, and other forms of cognitive states, differ from other cognitive processes in performance characteristics or qualities. A similar approach is also demonstrated in Pugh (2019). At a certain level of control and management, emotions emerge as a class of internal states that give a causal explanation for behavior. Feelings and emotions vary fundamentally in that feelings are experienced consciously, whereas emotions emerge either consciously or unconsciously. Some people may go years, if not a lifetime, without comprehending the depths of their feelings (Adolphs & Andler, 2018). Understanding the distinction between feelings and emotions is essential for any mental health professional.
Another significant neuroscience research useful for psychotherapy is the study of microbiomes in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Sarkar et al. (2018) discovered bidirectional linkages between internal gut microorganisms and the brain in their investigation, a relationship with largely unexplored psychological ramifications. The authors show microbial connections to emotions, cognition, and social behavior. For example, embryonic social behavior programming can occur in response to antibiotic-induced alterations in the maternal microbiome. There are also some microbiological links to autism. In their study, Sarkar et al. (2018) find bidirectional links between internal gut microbes and the brain, a relationship with largely untested psychological implications. The authors illustrate microbial associations with emotions, cognition, and social behavior. Examples are that embryonic programming of social behavior can occur in response to antibiotic-induced changes in the maternal microbiome. There are also some microbial associations with autism (Sarkar et al., 2018). The study and understanding of the microbiome-brain-behavior relationship may provide psychotherapists with another – biological – approach to treating patients. An integrated approach to treatment, examining the presence of these factors in a patient, may improve outcomes.
The emotion of sadness is one of the main ones that one has to deal with in counseling. A study by Arias et al. (2020) concentrates on studying the neurology of sadness and comes up with a number of findings. Sadness has been linked to a loss of cortical control over evolutionarily primitive brain systems. The ancient subcortical circuitry offers a neuroanatomical foundation that extends from the dorsal periaqueductal gray to the subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus, the latter of which is presently a therapy target for melancholy disorders. Electrophysiological investigations highlight the importance of decreased left-sided asymmetry in sorrow, confirming the interest in TMS stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an antidepressant target. Sadness is connected with a drop in cortical activity, which may lead to a decrease in parasympathetic inhibitory regulation of oblong cardioaccelerative networks, according to neuroimaging studies. Reduced cardiac regulation may play a role in epidemiological findings of decreased life expectancy in mood disorders, with results comparable to heavy smoking. These therapeutic mechanisms can be complementary, operating at various levels of the evolutionary hierarchy, and connecting with them can be the key to more successful work with grief.
The interconnection of various emotions at the neural level is also the subject of modern neuroscience research. According to Zhan et al. (2018), the neural basis of fear promotes anger, and sadness counteracts anger. Similar research results have also been reported by Hampton (2019). The “internal vs. external orientation” concept proposes that fear can enhance anger as its exterior orientation is connected with motivated action, but sorrow can counterbalance anger as its interior or homeostatic orientation to somatic or visceral sensation.
Examining the selective involvement of the posterior insula (PI) and the anterior insula (AI) in sadness and fear is one way to test this assumption because the posterior-to-anterior progression theory of insular function suggests that the PI’s role is to encode primary body feelings and the AI’s role is to represent the integrative feeling that incorporates both internal and external input (Zhan et al., 2018). During the fear induction phase, the AI, parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), posterior cingulate (PCC), and precuneus were more significantly activated, and the activation level in these areas could positively predict subsequent aggressive behavior. However, during the sadness induction phase, the PI, superior temporal gyrus (STG), superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were more significantly activated. These findings point to a probable cognitive brain process behind the statements “fear increases anger” and “sadness counteracts anger.” Using some emotions to influence others in individual psychotherapy cases can open up a whole range of new possibilities in treating patients.
Positive mental health behavior has the potential to prevent or treat many chronic diseases, however, the majority of individuals fail to live a healthy lifestyle. Recent advances in emotional research indicate viable techniques for overcoming barriers to lifestyle change. Van Cappellen et al. (2018) provide a novel theoretical framework that integrates scientific information about positive impacts with understanding unconscious processes. Beneficial impacts can increase long-term adherence to positive health habits, including mental health, according to the upward spiral hypothesis of lifestyle change. The inner loop of this spiral model highlights unconscious motivations as the primary mechanism for habit maintenance. The pleasant effect felt when engaging in a health-related action raises the prominence of stimuli for the cues associated with that conduct, which in turn guides attention and everyday decisions to repeat that behavior. The outer loop argues that positive affect generates a set of endogenous resources, which can then reinforce the positive effect experienced during beneficial health activities and strengthen unconscious motives. This study might help establish and solidify treatment results in the long run.
Loss aversion is a powerful emotion, and the unpleasant reaction shows the importance of negative emotions like loss concerns and phobias. In other words, loss aversion is a fear response. It is a crucial predictor of risk-taking because it compares possible losses against corresponding rewards. Sokol-Hessner and Rutledge (2019) published a paper that offers insight into the psychological and neurological factors underpinning loss aversion. The authors offer a new neurological and computational paradigm that connects noradrenaline to loss aversion and specifies dopamine’s particular function in risk-taking for reward. They also contend that loss aversion pertains to the expected emotions and immediate experience parts of conscious gain and loss rather than the long-term emotional effects, stressing an underappreciated temporal structure. This study is beneficial in understanding mental diseases in the context of psychotherapy. The improvement of loss aversion models, in particular, has extensive implications for decision science and understanding individual variations in economic choices and psychological well-being in healthy and mentally ill populations. Understanding these dynamics in the context of psychotherapy can help patients who struggle to make simple judgments. Negative emotions, such as criticism, have a greater influence than positive emotions, such as praise.
Stevens, in his work, substantiates the need for a new approach to psychotherapy, which is comprehensive. The author states that cognitive behavioral therapy is not always effective and some patients may feel misunderstood or patronized. Affective neuroscience, which studies how the brain responds to emotions and processes them, can give a broader understanding to the psychotherapist. Stevens (2021) found that the anterior cingulate cortex plays an important role in the conscious perception of emotions. He argues that psychotherapy should focus on emotional states and not on behavior or cognition since emotions, cognitions, and behavior influence each other. This means that any psychological problem can be approached with any of the three components. The influence of emotions and their effective use as a tool for influencing behavior and thoughts is also revealed in the work of Gainotti (2019). Neuroscience research identifies biomarkers associated with the role of emotion in psychotherapy that could lead to targeted interventions to reverse brain dysfunction while alleviating mental illness.
Emotions are also linked to human personality ideas. Montag and Davis (2018) explore affective neuroscience (AN) ideas in their approach to the research and understanding of human personality in their work. Unlike the Big Five, AN theory offers researchers a clear path to the scientific foundation of personality, including molecular and neuroanatomical options for interpreting individual variances in human behavior. Electrical brain stimulation and pharmacological testing have produced such molecular and neuroanatomical brain candidates in the research of fundamental emotional systems rooted in the subcortical brain. Individual variations in basic emotions, according to personality psychology, indicate the ancient evolutionary roots of the human personality, with fundamental emotions rooted in the subcortical brain. These basic emotions influence behavior in an upward direction.
Conclusion
Progress in natural science has resulted in a shift away from the essentialism of classical beliefs and towards a more dynamic, contextual, and constructionist approach to the physical world. Neuroscience is continuing the same trend, producing new findings, some of which are changing the basic understanding of how the brain forms the mind, thanks to breakthroughs in neuroimaging methods and analysis. Emotions should be investigated as dynamic, highly changing whole-brain representations of what physiological sensations signify in the context of the current environment, according to this viewpoint. The studied literature demonstrates the complexity and versatility of research in the field of neuroscience of emotions. This is an actively studied topic, but already existing knowledge and understanding of the occurrence and influence of emotions is associated with psychotherapy and can become effective in providing comprehensive and effective assistance to clients.
References
Adolphs, R., & Andler, D. (2018). Investigating emotions as functional states distinct from feelings. Emotion Review, 10(3), 191-201. Web.
Adolphs, R., Anderson, J. D. (2018). The neuroscience of emotion: A new synthesis. Princeton University Press.
Alexander, R., Aragon, O. R., Bookwala, J., Cherbuin, N., Gatt, J. M., Kahrilas, I. J., Kastner, N., Lawrence, A., Lowe, L., Morrison, G. R., Mueller, C. S., Nusslock, R., Papadelis, C., Polnaszek L. K., Richter S. H., Silton, L. R. & Styliadis, C. (2021). The neuroscience of positive emotions and affect: Implications for cultivating happiness and wellbeing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 121, 220-249. Web.
Arias, J. A., Williams, C., Raghvani, R., Aghajani, M., Baez, S., Belzung, C., & Kemp, A. H. (2020). The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 111, 199-228. Web.
Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2019). Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion. Neuroscience letters, 693, 9-18. Web.
Fox, E. (2018). Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2. Web.
Gainotti, G. (2019). Emotions and the right side of the brain. Springer Nature.
Hampton, J. (2019). Neuroscience: Learning about hallucinations, emotions, and intelligence. Self Publisher.
Montag, C., & Davis, K. L. (2018). Affective neuroscience theory and personality: an update. Personality Neuroscience, 1, 12. Web.
Pugh, G. (2019). Psychotherapy meets emotional neuroscience: The two minds of cognition and feeling. Routledge.
Sarkar, A., Harty, S., Lehto, S. M., Moeller, A. H., Dinan, T. G., Dunbar, R. I. & Burnet, P. W. (2018). The microbiome in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(7), 611-636. Web.
Sokol-Hessner, P., & Rutledge, R. B. (2019). The psychological and neural basis of loss aversion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 20-27. Web.
Stevens, L. F. (2021). Affective neuroscience in psychotherapy: A clinician’s guide for working with emotions. Routledge.
Van Cappellen, P., Rice, E. L., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2018). Positive affective processes underlie positive health behaviour change. Psychology & health, 33(1), 77-97. Web.
Zhan, J., Ren, J., Sun, P., Fan, J., Liu, C., & Luo, J. (2018). The neural basis of fear promotes anger and sadness counteracts anger. Neural plasticity. Web.