Introduction
There exist various reasons for my position to support AHCA policy. My Congress representative attributed the stand of challenging the AHCA that he was a Democrat and that the health coverage act did not match with the manifesto of his political party. In addition, the legislative member argued that even though AHCA was sufficient at minimizing the costs incurred by the US government regarding the payment of medical services to the citizens. Therefore. AHCA implementation will engender massive discrimination against people with pre-existing medical conditions and offers reduced benefits. However, the member of Congress’s remarks lacks statistical evidence as AHCA will ensure that individuals suffering from chronic diseases will pay lower premiums as the government offers subsidized medical coverage insurance (Geyman, 2018). The lobbyists must ensure that legislative members do not support their political party manifestos at the expense of the constituents’ healthcare.
In the interview with the member of Congress by various media station journalists, he argued that the Republican bill has several loopholes, including imposing a monetary burden on the taxpayers. For example, the AHCA policy allows a waiver of the ACA’s healthcare provision for societal rating and enables the federal government to charge patients more capital regarding the payment of premiums.
However, I support my position concerning the support of AHCA as it allows patients, particularly younger people, to have a high enrollment rate in the medical coverage initiative. Healthcare services should be affordable to all people, and the youths (vulnerable community members) should be motivated to join health programs as they foster a country’s economic growth (Béland et al., 2019). Even though the older generation may be overcharged to pay for their healthcare, the action allows the equity in delivering services without segregation, mainly to low-income citizens.
Scenario Surrounding My Legislative Visit
Member of Congress Opposition to AHCA and My Points to Oppose Representative’s Position
Notably, my legislative members substantially oppose the AHCA institutionalization as a policy that will regulate the United States healthcare sector. However, grounded on my three crucial points, I differ from his position of not supporting AHCA. Firstly, in contrast to the ACA, which highly concentrates on dictating insurance coverage decisions among US citizens, the AHCA foists significant trust levels among Americans (Geyman, 2018). AHCA enables people to make effective choices regarding healthcare concerns, including the nature of medical center access. AHCA eliminates health segregation as its refundable tax credit is available to middle- and low-income Americans, thus making healthcare service delivery affordable to every individual.
Secondly, the AHCA abolished most of the non-planned levy policies that were earlier promulgated under ACA law. The ACA imposes speculation surtax and medical equipment fees, which require to be covered by the federal administration and the related-healthcare agencies. Therefore, the presence of high-risk coverage plans of AHCA cushions taxpayers from excessive financial challenges imposed by the ACA.
Lastly, the institutionalization of the AHCA healthcare act spearheads a new cycle of decision-making (Béland et al., 2019). This, grassroots lobbyists can make effective choices that positively impact the livelihood of the local constituents instead of following the party manifestos and disciplines as members of Congress do. AHCA embraces a top-down decision-making methodology, enabling individual US states to be flexible regarding how they tackle costly insurance situations and allowing insurance regulators to deliver healthcare services to residents without restrictions.
My Nursing Experience Influence on AHCA Advocacy
To a great extent, as a professional and registered nurse, my work experience has significantly impacted my advocacy on AHCA issues. As a healthcare practitioner, I socialize and make contact with many people, including lawmakers, societal members, and patients, thus enhancing my advocacy for AHCA policy institutionalization. The explicit communication establishments between the healthcare clients and medical officials enable the nurses to advocate for health coverage acts changes effectively to facilitate patient well-being and safety (Béland et al., 2019). Therefore, since AHCA plays a substantial duty in reinforcing and promoting the client’s voice regarding healthcare decisions, it influences me to defend my position on the law.
Furthermore, I believe my stand regarding supporting AHCA and working at the community level enables me to advocate for the demands of my clients and societal members. Based on the work expertise I have received over the years, I can sufficiently challenge policymakers and other lobbyists, such as special interest groups, to consider the efficacy of AHCA. As a registered nurse, I am mandated to advocate for changes in laws in particular circumstances, mainly regarding ensuring affordable healthcare delivery to citizens. Most young people lack the capital to visit medical facilities, primarily those suffering from chronic ailments, as they do not receive employment benefits (Park et al., 2019). In a healthcare setting, the delivery of services should not be discriminatory but promote equity, whereby the youth can merit from the high-risk coverage plans.
Conclusion
In conclusion, AHCA is the best replacement for the ACA healthcare insurance policy. Even though AHCA has encountered massive opposition, especially from the Democratic legislative members, it offers extensive benefits to the patients in the healthcare sector. Since AHCA embraces the top-down technique, it enables the people and the grassroots lobbyists to make decisions regarding clients’ safety and well-being and spearhead affordable and accessible healthcare services.
References
Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2019). Policy feedback and the politics of the affordable care act. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 395-422. Web.
Geyman, J. (2018). Crisis in US health care: Corporate power still blocks reform. International Journal of Health Services, 48(1), 5-27. Web.
Park, S., Stimpson, J. P., Pintor, J. K., Roby, D. H., McKenna, R. M., Chen, J., & Ortega, A. N. (2019). The effects of the affordable care act on health care access and utilization among Asian American subgroups. Medical Care, 57(11), 861-868. Web.