Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Mar 4th, 2024

Introduction

The term accumulation media refers to turn out, distribution and telecommunication structures. There is now a new phenomenon captivating place in today’s extremely technologically advanced civilization; this is the digitisation of the modes of accumulation media which were mentioned beforehand. Furthermore, the hypothesis which applies to this digitisation of the accumulation media is recognized as the convergence theory.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan
808 writers online

According to this news there are plenty of differences between populace live in China and Taiwan. In a new pole taken in Taiwan, the majority of the populace wished that belongings remained as they are now. The greater part of the people who exist in on Taiwan do not desire to reunite or be reunite unless it is on their conditions with democratic China. The populace of Taiwan is content with the status quo, and they consider that communism will obliterate everything they have worked so hard to achieve. Taiwan wishes to stay a democratic civilization, and they believe that that objective will be not possible if they reunite with collective China. China on the other hand believes that Taiwan can be reunite with China and still uphold a physically powerful economy without any important changes to their civilization.

In additional universal terms the convergence hypothesis refers to the wedding of different technologies or industries. This meeting theory as it anxieties the mass media encodes all types of in sequence, whether voice, text, video, pictures and tune into digital formats. According to Vincent Porter simply put digitisation is the merging of the mass media by means of information expertise. Porter stated that there were two mounting trends which are facilitating this digitization of the media. Firstly, there is a tendency towards transferring all categories of information, voice, text, video, pictures and music into digital arrangements which can be manipulated by computers. Secondly, there is a growth of high pace multi media communication networks in excess of which digitised information can be transmitted, for instance the internet. This digitisation of the media makes global media constructions.

Current News of Global Media

‘Local Values’ versus ‘Global Values’

This research focused on this truth that the convergence of the accumulation media has some far attainment implications for restricted China and Taiwan cultures. However, single of the majority serious implications that this technical superiority or digitisation has is educational imperialism. All experts recognize this educational imperialism as an attitude of power over all non industrialised civilizations to uncritically accept the technical imperatives of the west.

No doubt, this news portrays the clear picture of a long history lies behind this issue show how China and Taiwan have been alienated from every other. After China lost a humiliating war by means of Japan, the Agreement of Shimonoseki was signed in 1895, which broken the first Sino-Japanese War. China was compulsory to cede the region of Taiwan to the Japanese. It was not awaiting 1945 when the Japanese were lastly defeated, that they surrendered Taiwan. With the beat of the Japanese, the Chinese rapidly seized manage of Taiwan, and set up their own government. Corrupt Chinese administration authorities caused resentment among the populace in Taiwan. In February of 1947, two existence after China took over Taiwan, the populace of Taiwan revolted next to China. However the Chinese were clever to quell the uprising in a substance of months and afterwards the Chinese affirmed Taiwan a region of China (Encarta 1998).

The next stasis is the cause.

Global Value. According to the expert analysis it is helpful for media reforms to obtain place, in order to reduce the harmful communal and economic effects for the nations it is moving. The onus is therefore located on the governments and media practitioners to plan remedial events. This process may not be a simple one due to the information the global media, is certainly propelled by globalisation. Hence the state of affairs worsens because each day the world becomes additional of a worldwide village. However apathy is not the method to go, changes have to be made to downplay the damaging effects of global media arrangements.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

‘Cultural Imperialism’ According to this news media and cultural imperialism have been old to describe a modern demonstration of colonial and imposing relationships in china and Taiwan, whereby these countries are twisted into markets for the cultural foodstuffs of leading nations. This, in turn, produces a marketplace for the manufactured goods and cultural foodstuffs of those exporting nation, as healthy as the supplementary beliefs, values, and philosophy. Cultural imperialism has been conceptualized variously as an approach on the fraction of these two countries, a restricted rule on the part of in receipt of countries, and an result on the people and practices in the last. Dominant nations have clear strategy concerning the sell abroad of cultural products. The income margin of the majority Hollywood films, depends on the overseas advertise. Affected nations have policies whereby they take on foreign technology and by means of it the matching software or indoctrination. These policies first and foremost benefit the elite. Though not easy to gauge, cultural imperialism is also a consequence.

The third stasis is excellence and value. There are lots of differences flanked by populace live in China and Taiwan. In a new pole taken in Taiwan, the greater part of the populace wished that things remain as they are now. The bulk of the people who reside on Taiwan do not desire to reunite or be reuniting unless it is on their terms with self-governing China. The populace of Taiwan is happy with the status quo, and they consider that communism will destroy the whole thing they have worked so hard to achieve. Taiwan needs to remain a democratic civilization, and they consider that that goal will be not possible if they reunite with collective China. China on the other hand believes that Taiwan can be reunited with China and still uphold a strong economy with no any significant changes to their civilization.

The fourth stasis is greater region. In the Greater China area, the call for indigenisation in social studies has been heard for at smallest amount two decades, frequently in the person’s name of Sinicisation. In Taipei, for instance, a symposium on the Sinicisation of social plus behavioural sciences investigate in China was held in not on time 1980. In 1983, two conferences on the modernisation of Chinese civilization were convening by the Chinese University of Hong Kong, of which one main theme was the Sinicisation of shared sciences in China. Despite a figure of remarkable near the beginning achievements in the 1930s and sporadic reflections in the not on time 1980s, discussions of Sinicisation of communal studies did not attract much notice in the mainland awaiting the mid-1990s. The first conference commerce especially with this theme was organised in Beijing by two Hong Kong based periodicals, Chinese Social Science Quarterly and China. Nevertheless, compared by means of the then main arguments in Hong Kong and Taiwan, which had been mainly positivistic, mainland communal scientists have known much notice to theories other than positivism.

Protection of ‘National Sovereignty’

The fifth stasis is action. Both countries have their own national wellbeing and are deciding what to do to create their own state stronger. China has consistently complete labors to stop Taiwan from gaining international credit. Taiwan had made great strides in the way of democratic system, while totalitarianism and political oppression declined. During the 60’s Taiwan’s interior government and its global status underwent few changes. Chiang Kai-shek was reelected leader in 1960 and once more in 1966 by the National Meeting. Taiwan was diplomatically documented throughout the world and its overseas deal expanded. Taiwan’s good luck would not last, however. In the near the beginning 70’s, Taiwan’s international position was rapidly dissipating. The United States, swayed by the Chinese government, began to look for get in touch with with China. This led to Taiwan’s exclusion from the United Nations in 1971. Taiwan’s seat was known to the People’s Republic of China. In 1972 Unites States President Richard Nixon complete a trip to China and as a consequence the U.S. opened a connection office in China. The United States ended all formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, following it had negotiated formal family members with China. The defense agreement signed flanked by the United States and Taiwan broken the following year. In a substance of a decade Taiwan had misplaced its global status to China and defense from China by the United States (Kazer 1998). To this day, China still intimidates other countries from shape any following ties with Taiwan. For instance, the Venezuelan administration ordered a state director to call off a scheduled trip to Taiwan, for terror that it might provoke China (cnn.com). The Chinese maintain that it is necessary in influence other countries not to maintain political family members with Taiwan, since they distinguish Taiwan as a renegade region.

The sixth stasis is financial system. The economy growth flanked by China and Taiwan has turn out to be more far not together from each other. The problem began when the communists beaten the supporter of independences in 1949 and the nationalists fled to Taiwan. China has attempted to invade Taiwan increasingly since the nationalists engaged the desert island. The United States has prevented any assault by China on Taiwan. Taiwan enjoyed a occasion of prosperity, in which it conventional military defense from the United States. During this occasion the United States also extended enormous economic and armed aid to Taiwan, which allowable Taiwan to slowly construct up its economy. By the occasion the United States stopped distribution aids to Taiwan throughout the mid 60’s, over four billion dollars had flowed keen on Taiwan’s economy. With the U.S. having helped Taiwan begin a street of financial growth, Taiwan was absent to fend for itself. Not only did Taiwan not fail, it in fact was able to continue its financial enlargement. Industrial manufacture was predictable to have risen over 300%, while export tripled and bring in doubled (Kemenade 1998). During this time, Taiwan flourished with its modern financial development and had a enlargement rate senior than the preponderance other Asian economies. Taiwan’s tremendous financial achievement has complete it very precious in the eyes of the Chinese.

Another deed that has been taken in new year would be the rule of China and U.S. according to Taiwan’s independence. China has openly stated that if Taiwan declares its self-government, it would take armed action. This has drawn great criticism from countries all over the earth. Even though the United States has affirmed that it would not hold up Taiwan’s independence, it would not stand any attack on Taiwan by China. Despite the armed act, there is also a query of jurisdiction in this matter. The Chinese have strongly spoken their sight that the Unites States must not intervene in this substance The Chinese learned lately that the United States might perhaps provide Taiwan with armed equipment to defend against projectile attack. In response, China’s Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan stated, “If some people intend to include Taiwan beneath theater-missile defense, that would quantity to an infringement on China’s sovereignty and defensive integrity and what’s more be an obstruction to the huge reason of nonviolent reunification of the place of birth” (Pomfret A13). in addition a older Chinese official warned the United States that such an action would be “considered a hostile act and would surely lead to grave consequences.’” (Pomfret A01). Relations between China and the United States have suffered very much over the contentious topic of Taiwan

Role of the Media in the Spread of ‘Globalisation’

Generally language, indigenisation is a group of self-reflection in reply to long-term western power of social learns (Yeh, 1994). Specifically it is fairly good to define indigenisation from a mechanical standpoint; yet, as a mechanical strategy serving to confront the overpoweringly western-dominated conceptualisations of social science investigates, indigenisation is not a feasible alternative to the existing formulations, which are able to transport about the resonance and valid figurations of realism claimed by positivists. However, indigenisation tries to form an option perspective by which a canvasser, as a spectator and a participant at the same time, with immediate cultural and historical knowledge, is able to state an empathetic understanding of the globe in which she lives. It thus provides a rebuilding of the daily existence and a configuration of the Weltanschauung of the populace under examination. Far more than a method, indigenisation presents an epistemological building that pertains in a straight line to a course of action most important to a cultural venture of popular democratic scheme

Remember! This is just a sample
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers

Conclusion

According to this news basis it is the opinion of this website that Taiwan be supposed to be recognized globally as an independent state from the popular Republic of China. This be supposed to be true not considering of the PRC’s claim to the isle, and regardless of whether or not the populace of Taiwan democratically make a decision to turn out to be a Chinese Province or if they make a decision to continue their present status as a sovereign and self-governing nation.

The administration on Taiwan is a multi party democratic system, with freedoms of depresses, speech, faith, enterprise, and so on. This administration represents 23 million populace. There are much lesser nations with representation in the U.N. and official embassies from earth powers such as France, Germany, the United States, and others. But the majority importantly, by no means in its history has Taiwan ever been a fraction of the following entity recognized as the People’s Republic of China. Most of the countries approximately the humankind have misshapen to pressure from the PRC to shift acknowledgment of “China” from Taipei to Beijing. This conciliation to an aggressive and threatening government at the expenditure of the Taiwanese is incorrect. Both countries should be documented evenly as two self-governing states at this time. Taiwan should be documented as a part of the popular Republic of China if, and only if, Taiwan makes a decision to turn out to be so. Otherwise, Taiwan is an self-governing state and together countries merit U.N. and international acknowledgment.

Reference

Li, Z-t. (2004). Building up China’s unique school of educational research: Significance and strategies. Educational Research, 1, 6-10. (in Chinese).

Lu, J. (2001). On the indigenousness of Chinese pedagogy. In R. Hayhoe & J. Pan (Eds.), Knowledge across cultures: A contribution to dialogue among civilizations (pp. 249-253). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.

Ma Rhea, Z. (2000). Facing the challenges of globalisation: Equity, justice and diversity. Paper prepared for the Globalisation theme of the United Nations Millennium Forum, United Nations, New York.

Mao, Y-q. (1999). From polarisation to integration: A study of methodologies in scientific and humanistic education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese).

Cohen, Richard M. “The Corporate Takeover of News.” Conglomerates and the Media. Ed. Erik Barnouw. New York: The New Press.

Croteau, David, and Hoynes, William. The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

We will write
a custom essay
specifically for you
Get your first paper with
15% OFF

Fink, Conrad C. Media Ethics. Nedham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Herman, Edward. “Media in the U.S. Political Economy.” Questioning the Media: A Critical Introduction. Ed. John Downing, AH Mohammadi, and Annabelle Sreberny-Mohammadi. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

The Myth of the Liberal Media. By Media Education Foundation. Dir. Sut Jhally. With Justin Lewis, Noam Chomsky, Edward Herman. Media Education Foundation.

Appendix

Letter:

Tuesday, Oct 16, 2007, Page 8.

Along with other publications, the New York Times has recently published stories about the looming conflict between China and Taiwan. Each country now has missiles pointed at the other. Invariably, mainstream US media start with the notion that the Chinese government sees Taiwan as a “renegade” province or a break away non-state. In almost every instance, the “one China” discussion starts with Taiwan on the defensive. Taiwan’s legitimacy as a country — with a democratic government, an integrated social system and a vibrant culture — is challenged. Is anyone interested in some historical perspective here?

There is a vast amount of academic research that disproves the “one China” model. Yes, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were both formed in 1911 and both claimed to speak for all of China, which has created political confusion. After 1947, the KMT wrapped Taiwan into its own version of “one China.” In 1943, US president Franklin Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Josef Stalin recognized Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) KMT as the government of China, including Taiwan. “One China” was recognized by former US president Richard Nixon and former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger in 1972. But no one today actually believes that the KMT speaks for “one China.” So why accept that the unelected regime in Beijing has the legitimacy to govern “one China?” Instead of starting with the myth of “one China,” one might ask how the CCP has the legitimacy to claim Taiwan (or Tibet, or even “minority” regions of China) as its territory.

The historical record is more complex and deserves a careful look. Before 1947, there are virtually no Chinese historical records on Taiwan at all. Prior to the victory of the CCP, Taiwan was never integrated into Chinese historiography. In fact, at the end of the 19th century, Christian missionaries like George Leslie Mackay and the great Japanese linguist Mabuchi Toichi argued that Taiwan had been populated by non-Chinese Aborigines.

In the 1920s mainland communist scholars such as Lin Huixiang (林惠祥) argued that Taiwan was populated by the Min people of southern China, a position dropped in the 1982 version of his book. The group called the Alliance of Taiwanese Aborigines has made the ingenious claim that even if Taiwan were peopled by groups from China many thousands of years ago, we cannot insist that they were Han Chinese. China has many minority groups.

In the 15th century, the Ming dynasty explored Taiwan, with no follow-up. The first explicit Chinese connection to Taiwan was in 1660s, when the great pirate-warrior Koxinga (國姓爺) led the defeated Ming to retreat in Taiwan, eerily repeated by Chiang from 1947 to 1949. From the mid-17th century, Han Chinese farmers cultivated Taiwan — not for issues of sovereignty and politics, but for economic survival. Many of these Han farmers led the first anti-Western revolt in Asia in 1652, when they threw out the Dutch. It must be embarrassing for the CCP to know that Taiwan represents the original Asian resistance to domination.

Between 1683 and 1843, groups in Taiwan rebelled at least 15 times against their Manchu overlords. Many historians note that by the 1860s, Taiwan was effectively self-governed, as the Qing regime was fed up with putting the island down.

In 1869, some Aboriginal groups contacted the US with the hope of diplomatic relations, and in 1886, with the Treaty of Shimonoseki, Taiwan was ceded to Japan “in perpetuity,” which only ended with Japan’s defeat in 1945.

It is a matter of historical fact that Japan has a stronger claim to legal sovereignty over Taiwan than does the CCP. History is not pretty. The CCP has simply selected notions of continuity with Taiwan which suit its geopolitical goals.

There is virtually no similarity between the history of Hong Kong, Britain, China and Taiwan — hence the disaster of Hong Kong and Taiwan being put on the same narrow rails of a “return” to China.

People need to honestly ask themselves what this China “is” that makes such poor historical claims? And they need to ask themselves what is this “Taiwanese” historicity that has never been continuous with any Chinese political formation, Communist or otherwise.

We should repudiate now Nixon and Kissinger’s Shanghai Communique of 1972 that set forth the contemporary illusion of “one China.”

Yes, in the name of “one China,” from 1947 to 1988, the KMT did awful things to the ethnic Taiwanese, Aborigines, and Mainlanders. But for 20 years, Taiwan has been a dynamic and democratic society.

If Americans are prepared to see Taiwan militarily defeated by China, then we should be prepared as well for a Mexican invasion of the US southwest, a Russian reconquest of Oregon and Washington and a French reoccupation of Louisiana.

The same principles are at stake. So to say it again: Taiwan has a history and a social, cultural, economic and political life that is not part of “one China.”

Taiwan is Taiwan. No government of Taiwan has to ask some higher power for the right to defend their self-created “history.”

“One China” should be an idea that is relegated to the “scrapheap of history.” Sande Cohen.

Valencia, California.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, March 4). Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-and-the-media-the-status-quo-of-taiwan/

Work Cited

"Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan." IvyPanda, 4 Mar. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-and-the-media-the-status-quo-of-taiwan/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan'. 4 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan." March 4, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-and-the-media-the-status-quo-of-taiwan/.

1. IvyPanda. "Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan." March 4, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-and-the-media-the-status-quo-of-taiwan/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Globalization and the Media: The Status Quo of Taiwan." March 4, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-and-the-media-the-status-quo-of-taiwan/.

Powered by CiteTotal, free citation generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1