The Supreme Court’s Internet Sales Tax Decision Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Written by Human No AI

The internet has diversified the conventional way of doing business. Many companies can now run without having a physical or geographical presence due to technological advancement. The government has attempted to enact legislation on online sales tax to raise extra revenue. Taxation is undeniably important in the functioning of every nation. However, the decision has negatively impacted e-commerce startups in different states. Hence, I am afraid I have to disagree with the supreme court decision to overturn Quill v. North Dakota and argue that startups should be exempted from paying tax even if they exceed transaction levels until they have a competitive advantage.

Small businesses face tax burdens, making it hard for them to establish and compete aggressively with well-established online companies. Exposing big corporations such as Amazon to internet sales tax does not affect their operations because they have a competitive advantage. According to Berengian (2018), e-commerce startups often face difficulties, including oligarchy competition and high risks of making losses. While trying to fit into the market, taxing these businesses is unfair because they need more time to adapt to the conditions.

The legislation also puts more burden on startups to determine how to levy taxes on their commodities in various jurisdictions. For instance, if internet sales surpass a certain threshold or number of transactions, the business must collect miscellaneous taxes in different states. When making online purchases, companies must now recognize both their online and physical presence. The decision would directly impact small firms because it necessitates the allocation of additional capital. The added input leads to an increase in products’ prices, making it hard for e-commerce startups to compete with other large-scale retailers and wholesalers. I believe that the decision is responsible for creating the big corporations’ status quo while undermining small enterprises.

Reference

Berengian, A. (2018). Forbes. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, August 14). The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-supreme-courts-internet-sales-tax-decision/

Work Cited

"The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision." IvyPanda, 14 Aug. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/the-supreme-courts-internet-sales-tax-decision/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision'. 14 August.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision." August 14, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-supreme-courts-internet-sales-tax-decision/.

1. IvyPanda. "The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision." August 14, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-supreme-courts-internet-sales-tax-decision/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "The Supreme Court's Internet Sales Tax Decision." August 14, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-supreme-courts-internet-sales-tax-decision/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1