Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Type of Action

Civil suit claiming violation of the First Amendment right and its constituent; freedom of Association.

Civil suit alleging violation of Fifth Amendment and its element; right to procedural due process.

Facts of Case

A correctional officer (Ross) hired on twelve months of work tests (Probationary) by the Clayton County in February 1992, accommodated his brother Andre Ross into his apartment in October 1992 against the correctional department’s policy. Andre Ross was on probation for failing to pay for child support by the time he was visiting his brother (Reuters, 2010). Correctional officers were prohibited from hosting, associating, or engaging in any form of business transaction with probationers by a Georgia Department of Corrections regulation. The correctional officers were to seek special permission from the head of the department before associating with active probationers.

Further accusations for abduction and rape were hurled at Andre during his stay at Ross’s apartment. Upon the police’s visit at Ross’s house to conduct investigations in response to the victim’s 911 call Ross turned out to be so confrontational besides being belligerent to the officers which led to uncovering of the Andres stay in Ross’s house (Reuters, 2010). Ross received a summon notice requiring him to meet warden camp and other supervisors.

Ross was consequently demoted to a lower-ranking position of “Correctional Officer II” from his current position of a “Sergeant” (Reuters, 2010). Additionally, he also had to bear a salary loss of approximately $3000 of his income per annum. Ross went ahead and filed litigation against Clayton County Georgia on October 15, 1993, claiming infringement of First Amendment rights and Fifth Amendment rights of freedom of association and procedural due process respectively (Reuters, 2010).

Contentions of the Parties

Ross claimed that the act of demoting him breached his First Amendment right of freedom of association considering that it denied him an opportunity to stay with his brother who happened to be a probationer (Reuters, 2010). Secondly, Ross also alleged that demotion violated his right to procedural due process.

Clayton County Georgia claimed that Ross’s right to procedural due process was not violated owing to the fact that he was simply a probationary employee and therefore he lacked property interests in their employment entrusted to fully employee officers. Additionally, Clayton County Georgia further claimed that demotion did not deprive Ross of his right of association considering the essence of Pickering balance, which seeks to limit correctional officers’ association with probationers without special permission.

Issue

Is the demotion of Ross considered a violation of Ross’s freedom of association, and if it happens to be true then Ross’s First Amendment rights have been breached. Additionally, does the demotion affects the Ross’s right to procedural due process and if it does then this means that Ross’s Fifth amendment rights have been violated.

Decision

The court held:

  1. Ross’s right to procedural due process was not violated considering that his rank does not allow him to claa im property interest in the employment.
  2. Ross’s First Amendment right of freedom of association was not violated by demotion and therefor his state law claims lacked merit (Reuters, 2010).

Reasoning

The court found out that Ross lack a property interest in his rank in the employment thus his Fifth Amendment right of procedural due process was not violated. Additionally ,the fact that he was not entitled to the property interest by his rank does not have a base on the First Amendment too.

The court also realized that the Pickering balance was essential to the Georgia Department of Corrections than to Ross’s association right considering that correctional officers were expected to seek special permission before associating with probationers (Reuters, 2010). It is undoubtedly that Ross waived this rule and rather hosted his brother in his apartment without following the regulations thus his First Amendment rights were not contravened as per the Pickering balance.

Rule of Law

From the case, one can easily establish that First amendment right of association is only considered violated only when a plaintiff can prove that the defendant prevented him from coming together to protect common goal.

It is also evident from the case that an individual’s Fifth Amendment rights of procedural due process is only considered violated only when a plaintiff proves ownership of specific rights for example right to property, life, and or liberty by the constitution but the defendant is depriving him/her these rights without following the legally laid down processes.

Reference

Reuters, T. (2010). Ross v. Clayton County 173, F. 3d 1305 (11th Cir. 1999). No Claim to Orig. US Gov.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, March 21). Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County. https://ivypanda.com/essays/constitutional-law-ross-v-clayton-county/

Work Cited

"Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County." IvyPanda, 21 Mar. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/constitutional-law-ross-v-clayton-county/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County'. 21 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/constitutional-law-ross-v-clayton-county/.

1. IvyPanda. "Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/constitutional-law-ross-v-clayton-county/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Constitutional Law: Ross v. Clayton County." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/constitutional-law-ross-v-clayton-county/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1