Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Every organization is responsible for addressing notices of alleged copyright, among other intellectual property rights infringements. In Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music, the issue was whether the defendant, Gorge Harrison, plagiarized the song ‘My Sweet Lord’ (“George Harrison v. Bright Tunes”, n. d.). Harrison was listed to have copied his song from a previously successful one, “He’s So Fine,” by the complaining author, Ronald Mack, contrary to copyright policy (Bosher, 2019). “He’s So Fine” was recorded by Chiffons, and the plaintiff, Bright Tunes Music Corp., owned their copyright. Even though the defendant’s witnesses noted the significant differences in the two songs stemming from words and syllables, modest modifications in the beginning phrases and repetitions were required.

Moreover, the court’s conclusion noted that the defendant had multiple possibilities of seeking musical materials. In such a process, Harrison possibly developed combinations that could please his potential listener through ‘My Sweet Lord.’ Additionally, Harrison’s subconscious mind knew the musical blend would be a success since it previously succeeded in another song that he could not retrieve consciously. For such reasons, the court was not convinced Harrison plagiarized the song intentionally but discovered that ‘My Sweet Lord’ was similar to ‘He’s So Fine’ worded differently. Therefore, it was a copyright infringement despite being achieved subconsciously.

Overall, the court found the defendant, George Harrison, liable for copyright infringement in Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music, becoming a commonly referred to as the dispute of music plagiarism. Apologetically, the court determined that Harrison unconsciously misappropriated identical harmonies of ‘He’s So Fine.’ Though facts established by the defendant’s witnesses could depict the notes’ differences, both songs had the same melodic motive. The ultimate determination of Harrison’s misappropriation and unconscious copying was guided by his decision to hire an educated musician to develop his banal musical ideas.

References

Bosher, H. (2019). Online copyright infringement by storage and transient copying. In Law, Technology and Cognition (1st ed, pp. 86-120). Routledge.

George Harrison v. Bright Tunes. (n. d.). Music Copyright Infringement Resource. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, October 15). Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music. https://ivypanda.com/essays/copyright-infringement-bright-tunes-v-harrisongs-music/

Work Cited

"Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music." IvyPanda, 15 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/copyright-infringement-bright-tunes-v-harrisongs-music/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music'. 15 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music." October 15, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/copyright-infringement-bright-tunes-v-harrisongs-music/.

1. IvyPanda. "Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music." October 15, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/copyright-infringement-bright-tunes-v-harrisongs-music/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Copyright Infringement: Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs Music." October 15, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/copyright-infringement-bright-tunes-v-harrisongs-music/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1