Alternative sources of healthcare finding
The alternative sources of funding are critical for the sustainable functioning of the healthcare system. They can enable the community to find additional assets which are needed for prevention and treatment of various diseases. Nevertheless, it is also important to analyze the impact of these alternative approaches on the resource owners. For instance, one can discuss the impact of health premiums. This term can be defined as the amount of money charged by the insurance company.
In this case, one should consider the interests of two resource owners. At first, it is critical to speak about families. The impact of healthcare premiums can differ significantly, and it is dependent on the income level of a particular household. For instance, the lowest income families will have to pay 25 percent of their earnings in order to afford these premiums. In contrast, affluent households will need to pay only 6.25 percent of their earnings (Hicks, 2014, p. 399). Thus, regulators should reduce the adverse impacts of these policies on the most vulnerable social groups.
Additionally, it is important to speak about the expenses incurred by the employers. These stakeholders prefer to reduce the costs of health insurance, and one should bear in mind that companies pay approximately 75 percent of employees’ health premium costs (CQ Researcher, 2009, p. 380). Some of them can be adversely affected by the increased health premiums because their expenses can equal many millions of dollars (CQ Researcher, 2009, p. 380). Nevertheless, the costs can depend on the number of workers hired by an enterprise. Some companies choose to outsource many of their business processes abroad. These are the main aspects that can be distinguished.
Policies related to public health insurance programs
There are various types of policies which are critical for the implementation of public health insurance programs. One set of policies is related to the price of care. For instance, the government can change the amount of deductibles which enrollees have to pay (Hicks, 2014, p. 424). This strategy can ensure that the program is affordable to people who represent different social classes. This is one of the goals that should be attained by the state.
Secondly, the government can introduce the set of policies regulating the work of healthcare providers. For instance, they can make sure that hospitals provide treatment according to the standards specified in the program (Hicks, 2014, p. 425). This precaution is necessary for protecting the interests of clients who may not always receive appropriate services. The third set of policies is aimed determining the amount of reimbursement to which the healthcare providers can be entitled to (Hicks, 2014, p. 424). These regulations can be critical for minimizing the cost of healthcare. This is one of the major concerns that attract close attention of many legislators and economists who note that the medical expenses grow at a very rapid rate (Beik, 2014). By adopting this policy, regulators can decrease the burden carried by tax-payers.
Additionally, governmental institutions can determine who can be entitled to the benefits. Provided that this policy is designed properly, legislators will be able to increase the accessibility of healthcare services (Beik, 2014). Overall, these strategies are supposed to reconcile the interest of different stakeholders such as providers of care, taxpayers, and patients. These are the main details that can be singled out.
Reference List
Beik, J. (2014). Health Insurance Today: A Practical Approach. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences.
CQ Researcher. (2009). Issues for Debate in Social Policy: Selections From CQ Researcher. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.
Hicks, L. (2014). Economics of health and medical care. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.