190 Essay about Court Examples & Topics

Updated: Nov 22nd, 2024

20 min

Need to write an essay about court system? Looking for a court case essay example? The issues of law and crimes are crucial in society are fascinating and worth exploring!

Table of Contents

🏆 Best Court Topics for Essays
⚖️ Court System Essay Topics
👍 A+ Court Case Essay Examples
👨‍⚖️ Essay about Court: Samples
💡 Top Judicial Essay Topics

In your court system essay, you might want to focus on American judicial system. Another idea is to discuss the theory and functions of criminal courts. One more option is to find some interesting legal issues and discuss them. Whether you’re planning to write an argumentative or analysis essay, this article will be helpful. It contains interesting court system essay examples, judicial essay topics, and ideas for your court essay.

🏆 Best Court Topics for Essays

Court Structure in England and Wales
The article below illustrates the hierarchical arrangement of the court structure in England and Wales. In England and Wales, the Supreme Court is the utmost court of petition.
Jordan Brown Court Case: The American Judicial System
He did not admit his involvement in the crime and was eventually acquitted by the court in 2018 due to a lack of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
“Supreme Revenge: Battle for the Court”: Documentary Analysis
The content of the documentary is proof that the Judiciary is a political playfield for the Democratic and the Republican parties as they struggle for control.
Joseph Haydn’s Contract With the Esterhazy Court
Joseph Haydn’s contract for work at the Esterhazy Court is a distinctive document that needs to be preserved because it explains the authorities’ attitudes to the music and composers in the eighteenth century.
Court Watch Expectation: Personal Experience
Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed […]
People vs. O’Neil Supreme Court Desicion
In addition to the murder and involuntary manslaughter charges, the jury also charged the individual and corporate defendants with reckless conduct. Secondly, the defendants argued that the murder charges were inconsistent with the involuntary manslaughter […]
Harris vs. Forklift Systems Supreme Court Case
The inference from this view is that Charles Hardy did not deprive Teresa Harris of equal rights for employment and was a person who was taught to disrespect women.
Greenman vs. Yuba Supreme Court Case
As the result of the trial before the jury, the court acquitted the third party of this conflict the retailer where Mr.
The International Criminal Court
Thus, it is essential to formulate the strengths and weaknesses of the ICC and Victor’s justice and to describe the relationship with the U.S.
Casebrief, Based on the Supreme Court: State V Hoying W L
Hoying fully acknowledging the violation of writing to the victim, which is in violation of the civil protection order asked Ms.
The R v Gordon Wood Case and Court Decision
It was brought to the attention of the judge that a week before Caroline was found dead, she had been seen in the company of the accused at a city fitness centre.
Why Juveniles Should Be Tried in Adults’ Court?
Secondly, juveniles should be tried in adults’ court to reduce and minimize crime in the society. When a juvenile commits a crime such as murder, the effects are overwhelming in the society and the impact […]
Supreme Court’s Decision in Tinker vs. Des Moines
Nevertheless, the court protected the school and claimed the reasonability and fairness of its actions regarding the suspension of the students.
Apprendi vs. New Jersey: Decision Made by the Highest Court of the United States
On the other hand, Apprendi had the right to challenge the alteration of the sentence claiming that it was against the constitution.
Enea vs. Superior Court of Monterey County: Case Analysis
The issue for determination is if actions that have a negative impact on the profits of the business constitute a breach of fiduciary duty, even though the partnership agreement does not specifically ban such behavior.
Court Observation in Courts of Sydney
Once inside the courtroom, he sits at the bench facing the rest of the court.the defense lawyers sit in the left side of the court, close to the dock, while the prosecution sits on the […]
The Criminal Trial: Court Observation Report
In this case, the accused was found guilty of the crime and the outcome of the judgment was that he would serve a minimum of ten years in prison.
Loving vs. Virginia Supreme Court Case
Since the couple pled guilty, the judge refused the appeal which led the case to be taken to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.
The Supreme Court Decision: Bank of Augusta vs. Earle
The Supreme Court defended its decision of reversing the case by stating that, the bank had the rights of suing the defendant because of the charter laws that defined operations of such an organisation.
Employee Benefits Program for Supreme Court Justice
They are also a guarantee of the independence of the Supreme Court Justice representative in the performance of his duties. In case of the death of a representative of the Supreme Court Justice related to […]
Court Proceedings Experiential Report
The practical experiences of the proceedings both confirmed and challenged some of the information that I have learned about the structure of a trial.
Does Understanding Body Language in Court Hearing Influence Interpreting Process
When the other parties receive the coded message, they go through the process of decoding or interpreting it to understand and meaning”.”Effective ways of communicating exists between the sender of the information and the receiver […]
Juvenile Delinquents in Adult Court
We are all aware of the existence of social standards concerning the status of children and adolescents, as well as the nature of punishment and justice.
Expert Witnesses and Testimony in Four Court Cases
The first case that was linked to the admissibility of expert evidence was Frye v.the United States, in 1923. The Kumho case expanded the use of Daubert and Joiner guidelines to any expert evidence.
Court Hearing Visit Report
Despite the need to uphold the principle of the open justice, some courts are held in camera, that is, they are not open to the public.
Court for Mentally Ill: Commonwealth vs. Bobbitt
Apparently, the actions and circumstances which took place prior to Lorena’s act of severing her husband’s penis, namely, the rape of Lorena Bobbitt by her husband, as well as the constant domestic violence of John […]
Wrench v. Taco Bell: District Court Case on Contract Dispute
The district court is the lowest of the hierarchical structure of the U.S.federal court system and is followed by the Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court, respectively. As such, implied-in-fact contract requirements were satisfied […]
The Supreme Court’s Role in Lawmaking
The vital role of the Supreme Court in the lawmaking process is explained by its high status, the ability to make hearings public, and the functions entrusted to it.
The Use of Cameras in the Supreme Court
One of the strictest norms is the prohibition of cameras in the courtroom. The blinding denied the fair trial, which was introduced, leading to the rejection of the allegation by the courtroom.
The Logic of Sentence Disparity in Court Rulings
The authors focus on the concept of noise and bias, but the emphasis of the book I on noise. After defining noise and bias in the first chapter, the authors dedicate the remaining five chapters […]
The International Criminal Court’s Benefits and Drawbacks
However, the ICC has the power to sanction these individuals’ arrests and bring them before the court, thus championing democracy and the rights of victims.
Court Cases Observation and Explanation
With the help of these judicial procedures, it is possible to determine in the fairest forms the measure of freedom and responsibility of a citizen in their complex relations with other people, society, and the […]
United States Supreme Court Justices
It should be noted that the role of judges is to guarantee fair decisions to the parties to the process. Accordingly, in an adversarial process, the role of the judge is to control the process […]
Supreme Court’s Decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma
In my view, the ruling revealed the fact that Oklahoma has, for a long time, ignored the requirement that Congress is the sole entity with the power to establish the boundaries of a tribal reservation.
Nurses in the Court, Licensure, and Regulation
Nursing licensure refers to the process in various regulatory bodies, such as the Board of Nursing, to ensure that the nursing practices are within its jurisdiction.

⚖️ Court System Essay Topics

“The Supreme Court: Home to America’s Highest Court” Documentary
In this documentary, Chief Justice John Roberts discusses the principal goal of the Supreme Court and the West Plaza, the site of several public protests.
The American Government and Supreme Court Composition
If the current Supreme Court judges were to hear the case, they still would uphold the ruling because it reflects their beliefs of defining the US as a haven dedicated to respecting human rights and […]
Court Cases Concerning Nursing Education
In the process, the question is whether the court’s ruling in favor of the nurse and against the doctor can be justified by a sufficient purpose.
The Griffin vs. California Supreme Court Case
In the court, Griffin refused to testify, and according to a prosecutor, the defendant’s choice was evidence of guilt. In turn, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt based on […]
Discussion Thread: International Court
As well known, in the aftermath of World War II, the Allies proposed the creation of an international court for the persecution of war criminals, which became known as the International Court of Justice, later […]
State vs. Anderson: Supreme Court Summary
With its main purposes to obtain, store, and review information received from fingerprints, the AFIS system is fundamental in the investigation of criminal cases.
European Court of Justice Case Analysis
Therefore, the company’s vehicles that featured the defeat device in the engine were prohibited per Article 5 of Regulation No 715/2007.
United States vs. Nixon Landmark Supreme Court Decision
Nixon case happened in 1974 is one of the most critical decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States because it rejected the privileges that the head of the state supposedly had.
The Supreme Court Chief Justice Position: Recruitment Plan
Afterward, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court must be appointed by the President, with the following approval by the Senate. As a result, fairness and the absence of bias in court judgment will be […]
Transferring a Defendant to an Adult Court
In the given case, it seems pretty challenging to transfer the defendant to the adult court due to the number of mental challenges.
Benefits of Three-Tier Court System
In the three-tier court system, there are the trial courts, the first appellate courts, and the U.S. Thus, the three-tier court system consists of a regional court, an appellate court, and a supreme court.
Legal Trends of In-Court Accommodations
This study by Celik owes that disclosure of cases of child sexual abuse is directly related to the individual and environmental factors in different age groups.
Section 2339B of the US Code in Court Case
To begin, the court concluded that the legislation was clear since the sections of the Act that pertained to the plaintiffs’ anticipated behavior were specified explicitly.
The Sanowicz vs. Bacal Court Appeal Case
I would like to appeal to the decision made by the Court that has concluded that a referral fee must be paid despite the lack of the necessary agreement.
Addressing and Respecting Citizens’ Rights in Supreme Court
Facts of The Case: Harriet Louise Adderley is the representative of the group of protesting students. The primary aim of the students was to protest for the releasing their black friends from the non-public prison.
The Supreme Court’s Cancellation of Vaccines
One of the points of view is that the COVID situation is getting worse, and the mandate was a logical continuation of Biden’s policy to combat coronavirus.
The Brewer vs. Williams Supreme Court Case
Williams became the main suspect of the young girls’ abduction after a young boy confessed to have seen him at the YMCA packing his car a large bundle of clothes with “skinny and white legs” […]
McKinney vs. Arizona Case and Court Decision
The Arizona Supreme Court upheld the state appellate jury’s ruling, holding that a court may perform a re-evaluation of the contributing instead of a jury in cases involving the death sentence.
The Supreme Court Decision on the Right to Same-Sex Marriage
The decision of the Supreme Court on the constitutional right of citizens to same-sex marriage is a significant event in the history of the development of modern democratic society.
Diana Levine vs. Wyeth at the Supreme Court
Diana Levine sued Wyeth at the Vermont Supreme Court, seeking compensation from the defendant for improperly written instructions to Phenergan that resulted in the amputation of one of the plaintiff’s limbs; litigation continued in the […]
Washington vs. Texas Court Case No. 649: Issue, Facts, and Summary
Still, the court authorities denied him a request to listen and consider the testimony of a witness or an accomplice, because of which the court’s verdict turned in the opposite direction.
Marbury vs. Madison: A Landmark Supreme Court Case
However, one of these judges, William Marbury, wanted to ask the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus, a mandate, meaning that something that happened in case of his appointment would not be delivered […]
Louisiana District Court: Role, Structure, and Jurisdiction
Criminal District Court in Orleans Parish has supervisory jurisdiction over the municipal and traffic courts. There is a total of 42 district courts in the state, executing jurisdiction of criminal and property-related cases.
Intellectual Property: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Eldred vs. Ashcroft
The other relevant information to be shared on the basis of this case encompasses the copyright and patent clause that accords the Congress with the power to provide authors the authority of controlling the use […]
The Institution of the US Supreme Court
The institution was designed as a check on the power of the legislative and the executive branches of the federal government.
The Supreme Court’s Internet Sales Tax Decision
The added input leads to an increase in products’ prices, making it hard for e-commerce startups to compete with other large-scale retailers and wholesalers.
Using Victim Impact Statements and Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandums in Court
Thus, I consider these documents to be of high importance, and the jurisdiction should give it more attention the punishments will only become more realistic.
Vehicle Searches: The Carroll vs. US Court Case
However, the court upheld that in line with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, the security agents had to prove that they had a legitimate lead making them believe that the particular vehicle had contraband […]
How Canada’s Supreme Court Affected Administrative Law Principles
The protection of the rights of a claimant should respond to the statutory scheme in an administrative decision and expectations of procedural protection.
Conflicting Cases and the Contemporary Court Systems
This paper will compare the constitutional framework of the U.S.and the UK, The cases in which the existing regulations collide with the essential Constitutional premises are quite few, yet they set the prime example of […]
Current Issues of Supreme Court Confirmation Process
This fact ensures that the confirmation process is impartial, which contributes to the effectiveness of the Supreme Court by endorsing the candidates who have the most suitable skills and knowledge to occupy this position.
Bordenkircher vs. Hayes, the United States Supreme Court, 1978
Is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated if, in the course of plea bargaining, a state prosecutor threatens the accused to be indicted on more severe charges if the respondent does not […]
Court Cases Showing Various Law Arguments
After further inquisitives, the Supreme Court realized that the need for the second appeal by the plaintiff was of no need.
Current and Future Issues Facing Courts and Court Administrators
The system of courts is structured in a way that both the innocent and the guilty have a chance to be heard.
Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and Consumer Contracts
According to the European Commission, the solutions to such complex systems are in the freedom of contract. Rules may limit freedom of contract in some member states of the EU.

👍 A+ Court Case Essay Examples

The Role of Expert Witness in Court
Some court cases may require the services of an expert to enable the jurors and judges to have a better understanding of the underlying principles of the case in question.
Design of a Drug Court System
Offenders have a strong incentive in being members of the Drug Court in that they have the prospect of avoiding being in jail for as long as they abide by the rules and cooperate in […]
Trial Court Functions, the Concepts of Schlichmann
The term preponderance of the evidence means that the side that would provide greater evidence concerning the case would lead either the judge or the jury to take one side as opposed to the other.
Juvenile Court System: 15-Year-Old Larceny Offender
The facts of the case show that the juvenile is a first offender and is yet to attain the minimum age for criminal prosecution according to the state’s juvenile justice system.
The United States State and Federal Court Systems
For example, if a person has a bank account in a particular state, then he or she is under the jurisdiction of this state’s court.
Supreme Court Eras. Brown vs. Board of Education
The primary purpose of the paper is to provide the in-depth analysis regarding a possible decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the case Brown v.
Intake Officers in Juvenile Court System
The final duty of the Intake officer is to determine whether it would be safe to release the juvenile or not.
Court Unification and Juvenile Delinquency
Speaking about the given issue, it is important to give the clear definition of this category and determine who could be judged by the juvenile court.
The Warren Court’s Rulings and Criminal Procedure
Police also inform the suspects that they have the right to an attorney that will be provided to them by the state if they cannot afford one.
Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases
Jones case, the placement of a GPS device under a suspect’s car was interpreted as a violation of the Fourth amendment by the Supreme Court. In the United States v.
Lechmere vs. National Labor Relations Board: Supreme Court’s Decision
Lechmere Inc did not allow the organizers to use the lot, and they opted to use the public strip of land to distribute the handbills to employees entering in the morning and leaving in the […]
FCT V Stone : Court Case Analysis
In particular, the court had to decide if the athletic activities of this person could be regarded as a form of business.
Systematic Review of Drug Court Effects on Recidivism
Although the article does not state the specific research question or hypothesis for the study, it is clear that the study wanted to address the question “what is the impact of drug courts on recidivism […]
The Structure of the US Court System and Determination of Truth
There have been suggestions to study the inquisitorial system and adopt some of its features that could help to improve the determination of truth under the US adversarial system. It is thus advisable to redesign […]
Jury Selection in Court
First of all, some attorneys will hire psychologists to analyze the prospective jury pool and help pick out which jurors would be the most effective for the case at hand.
In re Yamashita Case and Supreme Court’s Decision
As a result, General Yamashita was the commander of all Japanese forces that were operating in Philippine, so he was responsible for their actions.
Analysis of a Specific Supreme Court Decision
The issue of fetal protection and the safety of pregnant mothers as provided in the Johnsons’ Control fetal policy is one that, not only draws particular attention to the parties that it seeks to address, […]
Accountability of Court Officials
Therefore, just like the politicians and the government which is accountable to the citizens of the country, the judicial system is accountable to the citizens.
Court Decisions that Influence Juvenile Justice System
Supreme Court that postulated that an underage person is eligible to the rights of due process, namely the right to obtain counsel, the right to be notified about the charges, and the right to encounter […]
Is There a Gender Bias in the USA Court System?
The truth of the matter is there is gender bias in the United States court system. Another factor that underlines gender bias in United States courtroom is the number of female lawyers as compared to […]
State Court Statistics Project
Statistics show that the state of California has one of the highest court case filings, there are three different courts in California; these courts are spread around the 58 counties of California. Except for California, […]
Juvenile Court Philosophy
This philosophy states that a rehabilitation program can prevent the children from committing crimes since it attempts to transform cognitively the distorted cognitive behavior of the child involved in criminal acts.
Gender Bias in Family Court
This research study wishes to consider the current scope and resultant impacts of gender bias in the context of family courts in the United States of America.
Business and Corporate Law: Federal Court of Australia
ASIC was provided with the notice of the application and it advised the Federal Court of Australia that it did not oppose the application; neither did it propose to attend the hearing of the application.
Court Proceedings: Pretrial Motion and Its Aspects
Any request, defense or objections which are competent of resolution devoid of any court proceedings of the common matter may be pleaded at any time before trial by motions. At the discretion of the judge […]
Mr. Charles Dempsey Court Case: Cause and Consequences of the Crime
The case had gone through the plea hearing, the preliminary hearing the trial hearing and was to be decided on this day during the sentencing hearing where the judge was supposed to deliver the Judgment.
Dow Jones & Company Inc. vs. Gutnick: The Australian Court’s Conclusion
The paper starts with the details of the case, including the factual and procedural background thereof, proceeds to the judgment summary of the case and the analysis of the questions that the court ruling have […]
Cyber Crimes: Court – United States vs. Ancheta
Reasoning: The jury argued that the defendant conspired to violate the Computer Fraud Abuse Act as well as the CAN-SPAM Act, caused havoc to computer networks of the national defense department of the federal government, […]
The Introduction of the New British Supreme Court
The introduction of the new British Supreme Court has involved different constitutional implications, such as changing the role of the Lord Chancellor and creating a position of President of the Court of England and Wales; […]
Supreme Court Decision in the US vs. Bass Case of 2001
In the case of the defendant, race should not be a contributory factor and if this is so, then it can be concluded that the ruling was unfair.
US Constitutional Law & Supreme Court’s Decisions
It is not only necessary to have the necessary knowledge about principles and judgments of Constitutional Law by the Supreme Court, but it is also important to know how the Court has arrived at such […]
Rights and Freedoms: The Court Case Terry vs. Ohio
All these rights are noted in the constitutions of the countries along with the obligations of the citizens.”The Bill of Rights” is a very important document in the life of Americans, as this Bill guarantees […]
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Documentary of Supreme Court Justice
Ginsburg, who became the 107th judge of the Supreme Court and the second woman on the bench, was a sensation with the younger generations.
2017 ICC Moot Court Case Prosecution Argument
In the court case, the Counsel for the Government of Yunkel has requested that Judge Rosemelle Hasty, one of the three Pre-Trial Chamber members assigned to the matter, be disqualified.

👨‍⚖️ Essay about Court: Samples

Portrait of Kangxi Emperor in Court Dress Review
The painting belongs to the Late Kangxi period.”Portrait of Kangxi Emperor in Court Dress” is depicted with the help of color on silk on a hanging scroll.
Thurgood Marshall: Supreme Court of the United States
Thurgood Marshall, serving on the Supreme Court of the United States, was one of the prominent American jurists who played a pivotal role in shaping the history of civil rights in America.
International Court of Justice: Definition, History and Importance
The purpose of the court is to serve as the organ of judicial arbitration between countries that are members of the United Nations; it is also the organ that gives legal advice to the UN […]
Witnesses’ Role in the Court Trial
In conclusion, eyewitnesses’ evidences are very important during the court procedure, but judges should be very careful with these evidences and to check them carefully.
Public Interest Immunity in Court Process
Before attempt to evaluate the current operation of the law of public interest immunity in civil trials it is necessary to discuss the definition of public interest immunity, current situation and the judgement of few […]
Morse vs. Frederick: Decisions of the United States Supreme Court
This court is independent; this gives it the mandate to check the other two arms of the government that is the Legislature and the Executive.
Three-Tiered Court Structure in the United States
S is a three tiered judicial system divided into the Supreme Court, The Courts of appeal and the Federal District Courts.
Washington County Court Services
The former held notion about unaccepted restorative justice and the victim offender mediation has been reviewed and now the aim of this Court is to restore the relationship between the offenders and the victims and […]
Top Court Rules Against Police in Search Case
In the case in point, there are several issues which must be considered: in cases of domestic disturbance, who has the right to grant entrance to police; if police enter to protect one occupant, can […]
European Union & Court of Justice
The sixth most important developmental trend in the history of Europe has been visualized by Europeanization since the 16th century in a broad historical sense.”The primary and overarching objective of EU development cooperation is the […]
Supreme Court and Local Governments
Unfortunately, the ruling on the property by the Supreme Court is characteristic of a regulated market. To preserve a free market and the right of property ownership, the ruling should be reviewed.
Business Law & Court System in Virginia
The General District Courts and J&DR Courts are parts of District courts and they are courts of limited jurisdiction. Only the Chief Judges can appoint clerks of J & DR and General District Courts.
The World Court or International Court of Justice
All of the cases of the Court are submitted to the Registrar and when the Registrar receives the case, it is dated based on the date of receipt by the Registrar.
Necessity of a New International Environmental Court
For example, the international court of justice which is the Judicial Wing of the United Nation is in a position to hear environmental cases and fully attend to them.
Lomanno: Tax Law and Court Rulings Report
The second fact is that the husband of a petitioner did not have the permission to sign her name to income tax in the years that are discussed and there was also no approval to […]
Arizona Court System to Sue Uber Technologies Inc.
The use of automated cars by Uber led to several accidents that resulted in the death of one of the pedestrians in Arizona.
Relationship Between the Supreme Court and the High Court Justice
The given article utilizes the empirical and quantitative methods of studying the relationship between the Supreme Court and the High Court Justice.
People vs. Goetz: Court Decision and Implications
The court case of the appellant in the face of the People of the State of New York and the respondent in the face of Bernhard Goetz was argued and decided in the year 1986.
Hearsay Evidence and Witness Testimony in Court
A statement is only considered as hearsay if the objective of the testimony being presented is to prove the truth of its contents.
The Supreme Court Saves Cell Phone Privacy
From the article, it is clear that the government advanced an argument that police officers need to be given the power to search cellphones because of the long-established exception to the Fourth Amendment, which makes […]
State Court Organization and Structure
The advantages of the unified model are in the fact that they are operationally efficient because of the centralized regulation, effective use of resources, and the efficient approach to organizing the court operations.
Felony Court System Administration
Whenever, the members of the public vote against the retention of the judge, the governor is required to appoint another judge to fill the position.
Mock Trial Experience at Brooklyn Federal Court
At the first stages of the procedure, the Counsels succinctly and accurately presented the scope of the case. The defendant was accused of murder, but the motives of the crime were unknown.
Constitutional Law: Supreme Court and Stare Decisis
Such a system can refresh the views on legal issues and establish less stereotypic judgments, which is especially important at the age of democracy in the United States.
Larry Hillblom: Should Larry Junior Go to Court or Settle?
Due to the fact that he did not stipulate that illegitimate children would be unable to receive an inheritance, anyone who could prove themselves to be a child of Larry Hillblom would be a legitimate […]
International Court Punishing Rape in Armed Conflict
One of the main questions that often arise is the effectiveness of this court to punish sexual crimes in a way that would bring justice to the victims.
Supreme Court: Elk Grove Unified School District vs. Newdow
In the case, Newdow an atheist as opposed to his daughter’s participation in the recitation of Pledge of Allegiance due to the word ‘under God.’ His claim was that the school and the state were […]
Understanding the Court System: People vs. Turner Case
The case People versus Tuner is one of the recent cases that drew massive public attention given the sentence that the offender was given and the time that he spent in prison for the crime.
“Punishment” and “Conscience of the Court” Comparison
In this way, the woman shows that even though she accepts her role in the family and in society, she is not going to forget her own self and will stand her ground.
Women Roles in the Ptolemaic Court
The attempt to figure out the role that women played in Ptolemaic courts uncovered a radical transition regarding the significance of women from Ptolemy I, the first Ptolemaic king, to the beginning of the reign […]
Court Problem and Its Future
In the face of ever-changing realities of social and political contexts of the modern world, it is necessary to consider the transformation of the role of the judiciary system in the delivery of justice.
The Supreme Court of the United States
This paper examines the structure and functions of the structure of the Supreme Court of the United States as described in United States Courts.
The Eighth Amendment and the US Supreme Court
The paper at hand is going to analyze the attitudes to the Eight Amendment during the terms of the Warren Court, the Burger Court, the Rehnquist Court, and the current Roberts Court.
Home Firearms in McDonald vs. Chicago Court Case
The decision of the Supreme Court stated that the issue of self-defense and the right to possess and bear firearms might be reviewed at a state level.
US Supreme Court’s Ideological Tendencies
Political views are considered to be one of the key factors when the question is about the role of the politics in the decisions of the US Supreme Court.
Supreme Court in New York Times Co. vs. United States
The decision of the courts could have been because the executive lied to the public, and there was every right to make the public aware of this fact.

💡 Top Judicial Essay Topics