Constitutional Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 3

He notes that "If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go.but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent [...]

In the United States, the law should increase the number of women in the senior managerial and leadership positions by solving the shortcomings that describe their history.

This research paper is aimed at discussing the effects that can be produced by the changes in the legislation on the use, storage, and distribution of marihuana.

In the first part of the article, the authors present the history of the debates on the topic, highlighting the main ideas expressed in favor and against of the ERA ratification in the U.S.

The allowance of victims' impact statement in the form of video in court proceedings is real evidence for the determination to promote rights.

While the Fifth Amendment applies to the rights of the accused to an attorney during interrogation, the Sixth Amendment is applicable after the indictment.

This paper analyzes the differences that exist between the public sector and the private sector. The government, through the legislature, does the work of formulating laws that guide the private and the public sector.

The initiators of the Amendment believed that being free from the intrusion of the government into one's home is a natural right and therefore indispensable to liberty.

United States illustrates that the principles imbedded in the Constitution of the United States can be violated or at least misinterpreted, especially at the time when the country has to cope with a threat to [...]

The court ruled that the defendants were guilty of conspiracy to murder the American soldiers. The court held that the 4th Amendment does not require a strict standard of "the primary purpose".

This implies that an increase in the number of legally permitted guns would lead to a reduction in gun related violence and crimes due to the increase in the cost of committing such crimes.

Traditionally, the value of privacy was based on the strong belief that each individual deserves the right to be left alone and the right to choose what he/she wants to disclose to other people.

The plaintiffs argued that racial segregation in public schools had led to inequalities in syllabus, quality of facilities and the modes of transportation used.

The paper discusses some of the ways in which the theory of textualism makes interpretation easier, simplifies challenges, and how the theory compares to the theories of originalism and common law use of the principle [...]

2 Relevance of the ADR as an alternative method of settling disputes The ADR process facilitates the involvement of the affected party in making new agreements that can prevent future occurrences of a dispute.

He argued that according to the laws governing matters of issuance of a passport, the only relevant issue was that of his citizenship and since that was not in contention he argued that other issues [...]

"We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.

US and UK Methods of Choosing High Court Judges In the US, the high court judge is appointed for life by the president himself; of course this has to be by the consent of the [...]

In this phenomenon, only the accused and the plaintiff appear in court where the court or jury makes a verdict in accordance to the evidence presented by the parties.

However, to understand the details related to interpreting the cases and law and to stating the verdict, it is necessary to analyze the processes related to different courts according to their jurisdiction, and to focus [...]

The abuse of power is a prevalent phenomenon in diverse societies and systems of governance as evident by the practice of judges in the context of law and the ability of a president to pardon [...]

It is one of the reasons why the constitutions regulates the nature of the evidence used by the prosecution team in a court of law.

Besides, in 1960, the Supreme Court added to the rights of the accused through establishing that the government should offer an attorney for the accused, whereby the individual can not afford such services.

In accordance with this case study, the government regulation claims that, since the society is enlightened on the property use effects on the ecological system, the courts should go back to the pre-1922 constitution application.

The business inspections can be conducted for checking the business records, the state of equipment and firearms without a warrant. The courts do not need to authorize more inspections for avoiding the violation of the [...]

The meaning of the right to counsel includes the right of defendants who have no funds for hiring a lawyer to assistance of an appointed counsel which is especially meaningful in proceedings leading to imprisonment [...]

Scalia's views insisted that the Ordinance limited the freedom of speech and it only included the expressions regarding race, sex and religion and therefore, hostility could be expressed in other ways such as political association [...]

Guy say that "this has led to many amendments to the Canadian constitution so as to abide by this tenets, some of them are the charter of rights and freedoms, division of power between the [...]

A team of highly skilled people is charged with the responsibility of drafting statutes on behalf of the legislature before they can be passed to the courts for interpretation. There are several advantages that may [...]

The major component of these rights and liberties are the contents of the fundamental freedoms and privileges contained in 13 and 14th amendments of the United States constitution guaranteeing certain freedoms and privileges to all [...]

Thus, the absence of an effective policy is the main factor that led to the establishment of drug courts. These are one of the main points that can be made.

In his essay "Exploiting Nazism in Abortion Debate," Colleen Connell argues that the recent Supreme Court ruling that abortion and family planning should be left to be decisions of an individual and not the state [...]

The case between Brown and the Board of Education is usually considered a landmark ruling in the United States since the Supreme Court declared the law allowing separate schools for blacks unconstitutional.

As way of checking the powers of judiciary, the executive, upon consulting the legislature, has the power to appoint the members of the judiciary.

Opponents of the voter identification laws claim that the new policies affect the old in society, as well as the minorities.

Each state has the mandate of enacting statutes that govern the day-to-day activities of the state. Moreover, the Constitution must be applied in determining whether the state is legal or not, and if the complainant [...]

This theory argues that the ruling of the citadel of justice should be hinged on the constitution and the spirit of constitutionalism as envisaged by the drafters of the supreme document.

The decision is premised on the idea that the Constitution and especially the First Amendment give equal protection to individual citizens and to groups of citizens who can form unions, lobbies, or corporations.

The case exposed the fact that the First Amendment, which provided the rights of people including the freedom of press, was held in high esteem.

In this paper, I will seek to analyze the threat that was posed by the Bush V Gore case to the judicial procedures in this country whereby in the 2000 presidential elections provoked indifference between [...]

It is defined as "any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person which results in the death of the person".

On the other hand, the move would eventually lead to the retaining of honest and performing officers in the three branches of the government.

The prime function of the Supreme Court in judicial review is to protect the constitution and ensure that all statutes are consistent with the constitution.

However, the United States constitution has put checks and balances in place in order to ensure that in maintaining law and order, the police officers respect the rights of the populace.

For ease of determining the case, the lower courts had decided that Hutchinson was a public figure and Proxmire put that fact into consideration in his statements.

On the other hand, it must be mentioned that though it is the duty of the military to protect the Constitution it is only through the Constitution itself and its various amendments that the military [...]

The standard checks ensure the medical drugs in use are of superior quality and of higher benefit to the people. Gun control is the legal limitation on the use and ownership of a gun.

The principles which are presented in the Constitution of the USA are the significant components of the Americans' national identity. These associations are the results of the country's policy which is based on the principles [...]

Transitional justice can be defined as a kind of justice that is used to promote or put a stop to a widespread in the violation of human rights.

The first amendments made on the constitution of the United States of America in the year 1789 concerned the bill of rights.