Constitutional Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 3

Did the United States government show the justification for the need to meet the heavy burden for prior restraint on freedom of the press?

The U.S. The U.S.

In a bid to nurture the freedom of speech, the United States provides safety to the ethical considerations of free conversations.

The petitioner initiated the litigation process to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court to decide if the respondent had acted within the constitution by having applied the race factor in admitting to the institution.

Such a system can refresh the views on legal issues and establish less stereotypic judgments, which is especially important at the age of democracy in the United States.

In particular, it is about the right of the accused to a speedy jury trial of the state and district where the crime was committed, publicity of the trial, and providence the accused with the [...]

The period was full of laws, which allowed the separation of the two races in terms of facilities and social amenities, and yet the proponents insisted on the essence of the laws.

In the case, Newdow an atheist as opposed to his daughter's participation in the recitation of Pledge of Allegiance due to the word 'under God.' His claim was that the school and the state were [...]

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the State Supreme Court's decision to distinguish the validity of consent to search with and without the presence of another co-inhabitant.

Since the couple pled guilty, the judge refused the appeal which led the case to be taken to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.

The given case could be investigated to understand the importance of the issue and acts that could be applied. In such a way, Jones adhered to this doctrine as the trash provided by the collector [...]

Violent games appear to be a legitimate type of media with its right for free expression; however, minors should also be protected from the violent and sexual content of video games because they lack media [...]

The attention is due primarily to the presence of the bodies of powerful coercion in the state machine that gives them a significant potential in the preservation and protection of the legally fixed rights and [...]

The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Roe v. The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Planned Parenthood v.

The police service argued that the National Commissioner had been justified in his decision because he was following the Employment Equity Plan and that since making appointments was his prerogative, he was not bound by [...]

The Supreme Court of the US sitting in Kentucky ruled that the cited displays amounted to the violation of the constitution under the Establishment Clause.

It marked the end of a long period of discrimination and criticism against the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community and occurred against the backdrop of changing public opinion regarding the morality of same-sex marriages.

The original document contained all the provisions of the current legislation except the right of a defendant to get the services of a lawyer.

This meant that the judicial districts were matched to the state borders and supported the exploitation of the particular state's legislation for the majority of court proceedings in the area.

In addition to being a Justice of the country's highest court, Anthony Kennedy is also involved in a number of interesting didactic projects.

The decision of the Supreme Court stated that the issue of self-defense and the right to possess and bear firearms might be reviewed at a state level.

Political views are considered to be one of the key factors when the question is about the role of the politics in the decisions of the US Supreme Court.

10 As deduced from the definition of the sovereignty of the parliament, it is clear that the lack of the codified constitution in the U.K.has given the emphasis on the doctrine of the parliamentary supremacy.

The decision of the courts could have been because the executive lied to the public, and there was every right to make the public aware of this fact.

Hodges is one of the most significant cases of the US Supreme Court, in which the Court ruled that marriage equality is a fundamental right of the citizens guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the [...]

To be more exact, the current standards need to be shaped so that the policy in question should not affect the social perception of people with physical or mental disabilities.

The judiciary assumes the role of interpreting the wording in statutes to bring out the context of the same and the intention of the legislature with regard to the various situations in which the statute [...]

According to Thompson, Britain is a prominent country in the European region, and in the whole world. A written constitution would, however, ensure the influence of lawmakers is kept in check and that avenues of [...]

The Court's decision, in this respect, reflected the willingness of the majority of Judges to confirm that the provisions of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S.

However, the very nature of a constitution as a legal document implies that its main aim is to outline the most important underlying concepts and principles that the society should be guided by.

According to Oxford Dictionary of law, "constitution" is defined as "the rules and practices that determine the composition and functions of the organs of central and local government in a state and regulate the relationship [...]

Victorian Charter of Human Rights/Responsibility Act of 2006 is important, because it addresses the following."By drawing the nexus between policies and practices with human rights standards, the Charter becomes a powerful tool that changes the [...]

Nadine Lehrer, who has been studying the bill, asserts, "The bill was developed in the wake of 1930's farm crisis to bring farm incomes up to the par with the required minimum incomes".

Also, the paper discusses the significance of the verdict passed by the Supreme Court in each case and their relevance or influence on the rights of American citizens today.

The pros of the process are in the fact the ballot initiative is the direct reflection of the democratic principles in society when voters can pass laws and make decisions which the legislature cannot address.

Of all the American amendments implemented, the model of the amendments has been taken one of these routes: where two-thirds of the members of the senate and the house approve the proposal for the given [...]

On the other hand, proponents of the ban argue that assault weapons encourage crime and misuse of weapons. They argue that America is a democratic country and the right of the people to carry weapons [...]

The defamation law should be amended to accommodate the diversity of the UAE. In the first case, the Canadian woman is guilty of defamation and the Dubai Court of Misdemeanours acted appropriately by charging her [...]

Another significant issue is that the precedent of WikiLeaks questions the power of traditional journalism to articulate the needs of the society and to monitor the governments.

This decision removed most of the legal obstacles to abortion, and it led to the dramatic increase in the availability of safe abortion services in the US.

That is why, the combination of all these people, their beliefs and points of view led to the appearance of a great number of approaches towards the issue of human rights and the main idea [...]

Parties to the agreement do not have the right to turn out one of the tenants. Ultimately, the last survivor in the joint tenancy becomes the sole owner of the property having acquired all the [...]

Since lotteries are authorized forms of gambling, more and more people are likely to develop the addiction. Recent scandals and instances of corruption suggest that lotteries are still seen as a way to make money.

The premises for the provision of rights to every single denizen of the U.S.population can be viewed as the key asset of the Constitution.

In addition, the study intends to uncover the impacts of the said laws and the accompanying changes. The case studies will be compared to assess the impacts of legislations on marijuana in the society.

Critical race theory and the theory of three generations are some of the theories that elucidate on the significance and generations of civil rights.

At the end of it all, internet piracy will hurt the same people who are profiting from it because they will have fewer materials to sell or distribute in the future.

The following discussion is a description concerning the conflicts between Iran and the United States in the promotion of human rights some violations of human rights by Iran, such as abuse of the captives.

Currently, the issue of illegal immigration in the USA heavily dominates USA political forum, the Congress body and even the policy agenda in the federal government and even the states' government.

The fourth amendment in the United States of America Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that protects all US citizens against unfair searches, confiscations, and arrests.

The case for legalization of marijuana in Colorado evidences the need to alter federal laws prohibiting marijuana for its legalization law to have both statutory and federal backing in the state of Illinois.

In any case, nonviolence formed a basis for the understanding of the civil rights movement by the oppressors. Also, nonviolence was inclusive and allowed the average citizen to participate in the civil rights movement.

In the US, the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of expression; it is one of the main democratic rights and freedoms.

With considerations of the security systems put forth by the US security agencies, drastic changes have taken place, affecting individual personal privacy for the American citizens with the aim of countering terrorism in the US [...]

The president sent a bill to the House of Representatives where further amendments strengthened the bill to include provisions on the protection against racial discrimination in the workplace and incorporation of all the rights described [...]

If anything is to go by, the foundations of gay marriage uphold the belief that couples who have shown the purpose for their commitment should take to the aisle and commit their pledge before the [...]

The second section of the Amendment allowed for the repeal of the three-fifths clause of the original Constitution that reckoned slaves as a three-fifths of a person with respect to the apportionment of Congressional representation.

The number of single women is also on the rise. Single women should consider the caliber, size, and type before buying a firearm.

He notes that "If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go.but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent [...]

One of the reasons why the issue of drug legalization continues to spark up a public controversy in America, is that the representatives of the country's so-called amoral majority' are still being in the position [...]

In the United States, the law should increase the number of women in the senior managerial and leadership positions by solving the shortcomings that describe their history.

This research paper is aimed at discussing the effects that can be produced by the changes in the legislation on the use, storage, and distribution of marihuana.

In the first part of the article, the authors present the history of the debates on the topic, highlighting the main ideas expressed in favor and against of the ERA ratification in the U.S.

The allowance of victims' impact statement in the form of video in court proceedings is real evidence for the determination to promote rights.

While the Fifth Amendment applies to the rights of the accused to an attorney during interrogation, the Sixth Amendment is applicable after the indictment.

The parties are allowed to appeal the decision of the Federal Court to the Federal Court of Appeal. All citizens are entitled to appeal and review of the tribunal decision, meaning that the Federal Court [...]

The initiators of the Amendment believed that being free from the intrusion of the government into one's home is a natural right and therefore indispensable to liberty.

United States illustrates that the principles imbedded in the Constitution of the United States can be violated or at least misinterpreted, especially at the time when the country has to cope with a threat to [...]

The laws of the land define boundaries in which public administrators offer guidance, as well as the roles of the citizens in the decision making process.

The court ruled that the defendants were guilty of conspiracy to murder the American soldiers. The court held that the 4th Amendment does not require a strict standard of "the primary purpose".

This implies that an increase in the number of legally permitted guns would lead to a reduction in gun related violence and crimes due to the increase in the cost of committing such crimes.

Traditionally, the value of privacy was based on the strong belief that each individual deserves the right to be left alone and the right to choose what he/she wants to disclose to other people.

Besides being notified, inmates have the right to invite witnesses during the hearings to witness in their favor as a way of convincing the court.

The plaintiffs argued that racial segregation in public schools had led to inequalities in syllabus, quality of facilities and the modes of transportation used.

The paper discusses some of the ways in which the theory of textualism makes interpretation easier, simplifies challenges, and how the theory compares to the theories of originalism and common law use of the principle [...]

2 Relevance of the ADR as an alternative method of settling disputes The ADR process facilitates the involvement of the affected party in making new agreements that can prevent future occurrences of a dispute.

He argued that according to the laws governing matters of issuance of a passport, the only relevant issue was that of his citizenship and since that was not in contention he argued that other issues [...]

"We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.

US and UK Methods of Choosing High Court Judges In the US, the high court judge is appointed for life by the president himself; of course this has to be by the consent of the [...]

In this phenomenon, only the accused and the plaintiff appear in court where the court or jury makes a verdict in accordance to the evidence presented by the parties.

However, to understand the details related to interpreting the cases and law and to stating the verdict, it is necessary to analyze the processes related to different courts according to their jurisdiction, and to focus [...]

The abuse of power is a prevalent phenomenon in diverse societies and systems of governance as evident by the practice of judges in the context of law and the ability of a president to pardon [...]

It is one of the reasons why the constitutions regulates the nature of the evidence used by the prosecution team in a court of law.

Besides, in 1960, the Supreme Court added to the rights of the accused through establishing that the government should offer an attorney for the accused, whereby the individual can not afford such services.

Other interesting aspects of the judiciary include the criteria followed in the selection of chief judges and the senior judges. The American Judiciary is indeed a diverse and equally challenging structure of the legal system.

In accordance with this case study, the government regulation claims that, since the society is enlightened on the property use effects on the ecological system, the courts should go back to the pre-1922 constitution application.

The business inspections can be conducted for checking the business records, the state of equipment and firearms without a warrant. The courts do not need to authorize more inspections for avoiding the violation of the [...]

The meaning of the right to counsel includes the right of defendants who have no funds for hiring a lawyer to assistance of an appointed counsel which is especially meaningful in proceedings leading to imprisonment [...]

Scalia's views insisted that the Ordinance limited the freedom of speech and it only included the expressions regarding race, sex and religion and therefore, hostility could be expressed in other ways such as political association [...]

Guy say that "this has led to many amendments to the Canadian constitution so as to abide by this tenets, some of them are the charter of rights and freedoms, division of power between the [...]

A team of highly skilled people is charged with the responsibility of drafting statutes on behalf of the legislature before they can be passed to the courts for interpretation. There are several advantages that may [...]

Thus, the absence of an effective policy is the main factor that led to the establishment of drug courts. These are one of the main points that can be made.

In 2011, the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder organized by the soldier's father Albert Snyder in Westminster, Maryland, was picketed by Fred Phelps and the members of his family belonging to the Westboro [...]

In his essay "Exploiting Nazism in Abortion Debate," Colleen Connell argues that the recent Supreme Court ruling that abortion and family planning should be left to be decisions of an individual and not the state [...]

The case between Brown and the Board of Education is usually considered a landmark ruling in the United States since the Supreme Court declared the law allowing separate schools for blacks unconstitutional.

However, the decision of the court was that abortion could still be conducted at the third trimester provided the health of the mother was in danger.

As way of checking the powers of judiciary, the executive, upon consulting the legislature, has the power to appoint the members of the judiciary.

Opponents of the voter identification laws claim that the new policies affect the old in society, as well as the minorities.

Each state has the mandate of enacting statutes that govern the day-to-day activities of the state. Moreover, the Constitution must be applied in determining whether the state is legal or not, and if the complainant [...]

This theory argues that the ruling of the citadel of justice should be hinged on the constitution and the spirit of constitutionalism as envisaged by the drafters of the supreme document.

The decision is premised on the idea that the Constitution and especially the First Amendment give equal protection to individual citizens and to groups of citizens who can form unions, lobbies, or corporations.

DeFunis won the case in the lower courts and was admitted to the School of law, but later when the case went to the Supreme court, the question of Affirmative Action was avoided and they [...]

Elder and Terkel illustrate that "if the death penalty is not abolished, the population of death row inmates in the US will exceed 4,000 by the end of the decade". This confirms the fact that [...]

The case exposed the fact that the First Amendment, which provided the rights of people including the freedom of press, was held in high esteem.

In this paper, I will seek to analyze the threat that was posed by the Bush V Gore case to the judicial procedures in this country whereby in the 2000 presidential elections provoked indifference between [...]

It is defined as "any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person which results in the death of the person".

On the other hand, the move would eventually lead to the retaining of honest and performing officers in the three branches of the government.

The prime function of the Supreme Court in judicial review is to protect the constitution and ensure that all statutes are consistent with the constitution.

However, the United States constitution has put checks and balances in place in order to ensure that in maintaining law and order, the police officers respect the rights of the populace.

For ease of determining the case, the lower courts had decided that Hutchinson was a public figure and Proxmire put that fact into consideration in his statements.

It is characterized by the thinking that, the rights of the accused need to be deliberately protected in whatever investigation of the criminal justice.

On the other hand, it must be mentioned that though it is the duty of the military to protect the Constitution it is only through the Constitution itself and its various amendments that the military [...]

The standard checks ensure the medical drugs in use are of superior quality and of higher benefit to the people. Gun control is the legal limitation on the use and ownership of a gun.

The principles which are presented in the Constitution of the USA are the significant components of the Americans' national identity. These associations are the results of the country's policy which is based on the principles [...]

Transitional justice can be defined as a kind of justice that is used to promote or put a stop to a widespread in the violation of human rights.

The first amendments made on the constitution of the United States of America in the year 1789 concerned the bill of rights.