This case study is meant to enlighten all the stakeholders of the legal environment in the region, and how it may impact on an organization's ability to manage confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.
When looking at the concept of "The Tipping Point" and how it relates to my course in business law, it can be seen that new laws that constrain or limit corporate activities at times come [...]
The CIF contract is, thus, considered to be the contract that enables the sale of the products through the release of relevant certificates such as the invoice, the bill of lading and also the insurance [...]
The offer must signify intention to make a contract, definite without being vague so that court can determine the actual intent of the parties in case of dispute and be communicated to the offeree.
The trial court in the case held that the market to be observed in the determination of the flexibility of packaging materials had to be observed in regard to the competition dynamics.
On the statement of balance of the firm, fraudsters are usually interested in altering the figures of the assets, liabilities or the equity of the firm in order to portray false information regarding the position [...]
The affairs of the company in accordance with the article of incorporation and other relevant laws are fully executed by the board of directors.
This is because of the fact that the contract signed indicates that the employer retains the right to hire and fire any employee at will.
Following the failure by FFA to disclose the terms of the contract as required, Pro Golf notified the former of the intention to terminate the contract unconditionally due to failure to observe the contractual duties [...]
The whistle blowers were indeed justified in reporting the malpractices at the Veterans Affairs department because the vice reflected wrong information on the operations of the department. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the whistle blowers could [...]
On the other hand, Hospitex took part in the discussions to the extent that it proposed its own mechanisms of transaction, such as the law that will bind it and the channel to use in [...]
Performance bonds These bonds are designed with the objective of "protecting project owners from financial losses that might occur in the event that the contractor fails to execute the project in accordance with the predetermined [...]
The parties in commercial contracts have the freedom to contract, but the scope of the remedies and other modes of enforcing the contract are regulated by the Islamic law.
The possible risk posed to the public was examined using the security laws that are used in each of the 49 countries when there is an initial public offering.
In the case of Gramsci, the Court ruled that it was appropriate to pierce the corporate veil of Stepanovs so that Gramsci could enforce terms of the agreement under the contract.
As the judge in the case, I would rule in favor of the plaintiff and oblige the defendant to pay for the damages as requested.
In the law of contracts, when a contract is rescinded, it means that the two parties to the contract have been relieved of their obligation in relation to the initial contract entered in the initial [...]
The call most definitely focused on the situation at ImClone and of the decision of the Waksals to sell all of their shares, and helped her arrive at the decision to sell all of her [...]
The company is involved in several activities within the energy sector especially exploration of gas and oil, refinery and distribution of the same, generation of power and in retailing of gas and petroleum products.
The subsequent reluctance to alert its clients of the stated defects in its vehicles publicly, and denial of the existence of the same defects make Toyota Motor Corporation culpable, and the ensuing product liability lawsuits [...]
It was therefore necessary for the plaintiffs to be compensated for the economic risk they were placed in by the state of their house.
Additionally, the available resources that franchises are willing to invest in a person will make this form of business the best one.
According to the Residential Landlord and Tenant law, the property owner may have to evict the new occupant because the act violates the rights of the first tenant.
The risks relating to the quality of the job will be determined by the outcome of the refurbishment. This principle of allocation will ensure that the contractor aligns his refurbishment team with the performance goals [...]
This is a type of funding request contract wherein in return for services rendered, an employee of a company is entitled under the stipulations indicated within their primary employment contract to request funds from the [...]
Particularly, the definition of the main aspects of the agreement: offer and acceptance, considerations, legal purposes, and legal power of the contract.
Wal-Mart is an example of a company that has been reported to contravene the provisions of the antitrust laws. This gives the monopsonist the opportunity to dictate the market by offering low prices to suppliers.
The legality of the activities according to federal, state, and local laws should follow the principle of good governance through honesty and good faith.
According to Figueroa, task details an inputted by the service beneficiary may include exact location for easy delivery of goods and services; a timeframe within which the task should be carried out and the service [...]
This necessitated the need for review and revision of the procedures that these firms use to detect fraud in present and future financial audit statements. Regulations in SAS 99 improve necessary procedures involved in the [...]
In this proposal, it shall be argued that the FW Act is a far better legislation for collective bargaining than previous legislations through an analysis of the core values in the legislation and some of [...]
What supporters of tort reform believe in is that the whole idea of reforming tort is contentious since its proponents are only keen on limiting the amount of awards to injure due to personal and [...]
Also, what were the demands of the workers and was it their right to refuse work? In the case of Eads, it has the responsibility to provide a safe and equal work environment to all [...]
The fact of the agreement was that the defendant had a prior knowledge of restrictions stipulated in the agreement with the claimant.
In review of the Case involving Drive Yourself Company and the minor, it is evident that the company acted on negligence when making the recruitment of the new driver.
In most of the fraud cases in an organization, the master planners are the employees or people who understand the operation procedures of the organization well.
Plaintiff and defendant The potential plaintiff in the tort case is the SureCo Company. Elements of slander that constitutes the plaintiff's claim The actions of Raul satisfy the essential elements of a slander.
The operator of the pink monorail survived the incident unscathed because he was backing up the monorail and therefore it was the tail-end of the vehicle that collided with the purple monorail.
In this case, the defendant contributed to the plaintiff's loss by selling a car with faulty dashboard compass to the plaintiff.
It is reasonable to mark that the profession of an insurance agent requires the skills to sell insurance and promote the services of the company for the probable clients to apply.
When signing an insurance policy, there are some conditions that are special to a particular case, in the case that they offer some duty of care to the policyholder, then in case of an incidence [...]
In order for such contracts to satisfy the statute of frauds, there must be a signed document which can reasonably identify the subject of the contract, outline that a contract has been entered into by [...]
In other words, she is entitled to challenge the directive requiring her to transport the patients without any fear of termination since the directive compromises not only her own safety but the safety of others [...]
Ruling: The criminal court of appeals of Texas held that the evidence was sufficient in establishing that the appellant knew the content and character of the video tape and thus affirmed the conviction.
The Supreme Court defended its decision of reversing the case by stating that, the bank had the rights of suing the defendant because of the charter laws that defined operations of such an organisation.
To mitigate this, governments have in the recent past established legislations that seek to protect employees from such discriminations when it comes to employment, promotions, demotions and rewards.
However, he can take it a step further and prove that the dismissal was also unfair due to the circumstances of the case.
The theory of objectivity in a contract implies that for an offer and acceptance to take place, the reasonableness of the offer and acceptance should be considered, thus other than the mutual consent of the [...]
However, this does not negate the fact that bribery is a violation of a legal and ethical principle in the society.