Criminal Law Essay Examples and Topics

If one is to discuss the issue with the senior management of the organization in which the crime occurred, there is a high chance that the issue will not be taken as seriously due to [...]

The rise of Internet technology gave way to numerous challenges, and one of them is the spreading of cyberbullying. Recent data show that there is a clear gender distinction in terms of the perpetrators and [...]

The work of police officers and other personnel in criminal justice requires proof and accuracy in determining the cause and effects of a crime.

To make the matters worse they are abused and the money goes to the pockets of these greedy people as they are left empty handed after all the humiliation they go through.

One of the most essential arguments against the RA 10175 is the statement that the Act introduces a severe punishment for libel.

The case of murder of JonBenet Ramsey is one of most mysterious episodes in the American criminology, and this report is the attempt to bring some light to the case based on the mistakes made [...]

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

In particular, according to the TechFite case, one example of a breach of duty of care might be the insufficient attention of the Security Analyst to the operations of the Application Division, which has led [...]

One thing that must be cleared to all is that it is not our view that the poor people are all guiltless victims who suffer the persecution of the rich people but it is said [...]

Parents should be held responsible for the crime of their children because in most cases criminal involvement of children is the result of lack of parental control.

CCTV cameras are also used in places of work to aid employers to monitor their employees' activities, improve productivity and security, and reduce theft.

Although one of the mandates of the NYPD includes preventing crime from occurring by deploying legal means, this paper questions the legal and ethical foundation of the 'stop and frisk' law applied by the NYPD. [...]

The least in ranking is crimes against public order for they have no serious repercussions to lives and livelihood of the involved people.

As mentioned in the introduction, building more prisons is just one of the many solutions to the problem of overcrowding in prisons.

The article by Gerhold emphasizes the system's effectiveness by highlighting that "only 20% of those released become repeat offenders in the country" in Norway, compared to the 76. To summarize, the Halden prison in Norway [...]

In the particular case under analysis the issue, which is presented to the court, is the admissibility of the evidence. As Melear states in her article, if the weapon which was not used in the [...]

The bullet trajectory includes the progress of the bullet through the barrel of the gun following discharge or detonation and its pathway both through the air and the aim.

Additionally, the judge addresses the jury concerning the case by offering them the mandate to exonerate the dependant in case of a logical query.

Cases of murder falls in the rule of felony murder which is well stipulated by the constitution of any given country and the penalty is administered depending on whether the case was committed in an [...]

In covering the benefits and shortcomings of sex tourism, the paper will try to establish whether sex tourism is something that is ethical and desirable in society. The analyses of the legal aspect of sex [...]

There was a sense of belief among Stephens and Dudley that their act of cannibalism would not result in persecution due to the custom of the sea.

The cases of female sex offenders are not unknown to the society; for example, a high school or college teacher that was accused of student's sex abuse and confronts the criminal justice system.

A pre-term release can negatively affect prisoners' mindsets, increase the risk of ex-inmates committing a crime and returning to prison, and be dangerous to society.

For the case of murder or crimes that necessitate capital punishment, the incentive to commit murder is directly related to the uncertainties that punishments for the crime will generate.

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

In the end, it was an electrician who identified the typical signs of abuse in Daniel that finally led police to investigate, thereby exposing the weakness and ineffectiveness of the Dual Track System; the child [...]

The elements of proof for arson include motive, evidence of ownership, malicious intent, and presence of fire. The elements necessary to prove arson include malicious conduct, presence of fire, and ownership of property.

In the given case, Christopher Watts, a 33-year-old man residing in Frederick, the state of Colorado, was a defendant. Initially, Christopher Watts rejected his involvement in the deaths of his wife and daughters.

According to Holmes and Holmes, the majority of child predators "had some form of child pornography in their possession at the time of arrest".

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

The paper at hand is devoted to the investigation of the life, personality, and criminal behavior of one of the most notorious American serial killers of 1980s-1990s, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer.

In the movie, the conventional retributive system of justice is used to deal with the case of sexual assault. Taking into consideration the seriousness of the crimes, it seems not relevant to apply the restorative [...]

Mills rightly points out that the very grounds of humanity used to support the removal of the death penalty should also be the ones used to support retaining of the sentence.

Nevertheless, such a claim is questionable because it is the same constitution that has a bill of rights indicating that it is the right of every citizen to be protected and to live.

One of the key causes of overcrowding is the continuing growth in the population of criminals sent to jail. The people have had to wait for their trial turn, and the only place to wait [...]

Mass incarceration in the United States of America is considered one of the most important problems and the number of prisoners continues to increase.

The fact that he was put under his mother's care is rather surprising because she failed to take care of him as he was a child and suffered from a mental disease.

The writer suggests that even if the call for tougher penalties is seen as the answer to the problem, those calling for these penalties are not necessarily affected by the rising crime. There is need [...]

Finding the poison that Juan bought to poison his mother-in-law and kept somewhere in his car could be a significant piece of evidence.

According to the defense side of the case, the warrant that was obtained by the detectives only covered the investigation on the residence. For instance, they collected the evidence without a search warrant.

Other than the problem of failure to complete jail terms, overcrowding in prisons called for the building of more prisoners to accommodate a large number of prisoners and this translated to heavy costs to the [...]

The officer should also package information in a way that it is easy to decode and understand. Such communication enables police officers in charge of the inmates to access important information from them.

Incarcerated Women and Abortion One of the rights that women have championed and gained in the 21st century is the right to access abortion services.

A judge may impose a penalty on the perpetrator according to the severity of the crime. In such instances, a convicted must pay a certain amount of money to the court.

Reports show that the crime is on the rise because more people have access to computers and the internet than ever before.

Ulcepo noted in his article that though capital punishment continues to be practiced today in several countries like the USA, my feeling is that pleas calling for the abolishment of the death penalty should be [...]

The defendant in this case, the house owner, was held responsible for a battery of injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a trespasser, who set off a spring gun set as a booby trap in an [...]

Mark is very upset that he did not get the promotion and has decided to go to the EEOC to report that he is being discriminated against and that you are retaliating against him because [...]

Policing became a legitimate practice in the eyes of the public. The focus of Peelian principles is on preventing crime and not necessarily catching criminals in the act.

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

Cheney's Law is a step by step account of the actions taken by Vice President Dick Cheney to enhance the executive power of the president, as the Commander in Chief in times of war.

The problem analyzed in the current paper is the impact of probation on the work of the officers engaged in this system.

Date rape is a domestic crime, it is a huge problem to lots of people, and it needs to be solved somehow.

During the trial, the Tennessee preacher's wife claimed that her partner had been abusing her both sexually and physically for a long time. Mary's mental condition and responsibility for the crime were mitigating factors that [...]

Though these guidelines are available and are supposed to be the guide for the justice system, there have been cases when there have been a miscarriage of justice, which has led to the conviction of [...]

It was brought to the attention of the judge that a week before Caroline was found dead, she had been seen in the company of the accused at a city fitness centre.

It is easy for the prosecution, in this case, to request the judge to sentence the defendant due to her criminal behavior.

This does not in any way violate the mother's rights because they still have a chance to be with their children once they are fully reformed.

A Presentation of the Mission Statement of the Social Agency The parole agency in the United States has an important role on the security well being and the freedom of the inmates.

The central values of the US criminal justice system are to protect the rights of citizens and ensure the safety of a society in which everyone is equal before the law.

In as much as some human rights activists often complain of the violation of the rights by the justice system, India's criminal system has faced significant changes since colonial times to the present.

The lack of accurate definition of what entails child sexual abuse is further hindered by inadequate statistics on cases of child abuse.

Other types of graffiti such as the commercial graffiti are categorized as crimes because making use of graffiti as a form of advertisement is usually against the advertisement along with media laws established in most [...]

Various ethical issues such as the code of silence, the mental status of the offender, and limited evidence play a vital role in challenging the discretion of police officers in arresting the DV perpetrators.

Therefore, studying the processes that take place before the trial is important for understanding the overall delivery of criminal justice. Before the trial begins, the defense attorney and the prosecutor must prepare for it.

The accused is alleged to have injured his wife due to careless driving that resulted in the demise of the unborn child, consequently a successful escape of the son unhurt.

In this regard, the criminal justice system possesses the power to control crime and punish those who violate the law. The chapter attempts to familiarize the readers with the structure and function of the criminal [...]

This paper will discuss the role of the internet in the spread of child pornography. Before the popularity of the internet in the 1980s, child pornography was rare and unheard of.

Evidence-based practice in the criminal justice sector has concentrated on policies that deal with the administration of these sectors based on the correctional process of the incarcerated persons.

White-collar crime can be defined as the unlawful acquisition of money by failing to adhere to the set rules and regulations in terms of fraud and stealing money meant for a private entity or public [...]

Organic evidence is obtained from the body of the victim or the perpetrator's body. At other times the evidence may be interfered with when chemical compounds are used near the crime scene to conceal the [...]

Overall, it can be argued that the Mapp v Ohio ruling dramatically changed the operations and behavior of state police officers by putting a stop to the admission of evidence obtained by a search in [...]

It is the duty of the investigating officer to advise the subject that constrained responses would not be admissible in future hearings by a jurist.

The Exclusionary rule is based on the rights granted to the United States citizens by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution that was designed to protect the right of the American citizens "to be secure [...]

However, the lack of information regarding the concept of cybercrime, the ways of inhibiting it and the tools that the UAE society can use to prevent cybercrimes are not completely obvious.

The necessary part of the paper is the information about changes to the original policy. The discussion of this act and how necessary it is for the criminal justice system in The United States is [...]

Flaws in the network allow hackers to access the systems. In efforts to reduce hacking in the country, a number of police units have been formed.

In some instances, law enforcement officers have to get court orders first before they are allowed to search the premises of criminal suspects and this makes it difficult for them to stop different criminal incidents [...]

This paper discusses some of the methods that can be used to counter these barriers and ensure the successful community reintegration of prisoners. The successful reintegration of prisoners into society is crucial to the safety [...]

This bill is supposed to make the Canadian society more secure, but at the same time it will result in the increased expenses for the government and excessive criminalization of many individuals.

The practice of money laundering affects the economy and security of a country. Countries have directed their efforts to curb money laundering to control the downwards projections of their countries' economies.

This paper seeks to define fraud, look at the types of fraud and the consequences of fraud to financial systems. Such fraud denies qualified job seekers places in such companies and this increases the number [...]

While harsh punishments appear to offer a solution to the problem, this measure may be detrimental to the welfare of the child in the case where the abuser is its guardian.

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

The beginning of the 20th century set the foundation for labor racketeering and became a law and societal concern. Among other beneficial businesses for the organized crime was labor racketeering through the control of labor [...]

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

The data available in NCVS to examine the utility of employing the NCVS to quantify white-collar crimes includes the list of white-collar crimes and their classification.

The given case will be analyzed from the perspective of Agnew's General Strain Theory, which was built upon the ideas of Merton's Strain Theory. Agnew's general strain theory fails to explain the magnitude and range [...]

It also gains capacity with the regulations and reaction of crime from the society and the government. In homicide research, the characteristics and methods of qualitative research are evident.

Their roles seem to cover even the responsibilities of leaders in the private security business. As such, they have to respond to issues that are raised by the public concerning their security.

As the review of self-defense, provocation, and diminished responsibility revealed, they refer to different circumstances in which full or partial defense may be given to an accused who committed a homicide unintentionally.

Considering that any form of employee theft induces substantial harm to the financial performance of companies, the integration of adequate crime prevention procedures in the corporate security system is of great importance.

Introduction The meaning of sexual misconduct Sexual misconduct as a problem facing many societies The scope of the problem History of sexual misconduct The magnitude of this vice in the world Problem conceptualization and [...]

Prostitution is one of the oldest professions in the world. In fact, his presence is a joy to the prostitute.

Therefore, this story of Noah becomes the tale of resilience and self-preservation in the face of competing demands and adverse factors.

The reason behind incorporating the two notions was that people had to be responsible for what they do whether intentionally or not; the law also seeks to prevent people with criminal intentions from violating the [...]

Despite regarding Middleton's behavior as ethically inappropriate due to the power differential between the involved parties, the court declined Chesier's claim and denied her motion for summary judgment.

The recognition that Thelma and Louise get when they become the ones who occupy the traditionally male roles is what might make the audience think about the irrational approach of the community to numerous issues [...]

For the entrapment case to be used as a defense, the defendant should not have exhibited the intent of committing a crime prior to the entrapment.

The main argument is money, and the pursuit of it particularly among major criminals pushing cocaine and heroin evokes every illegal act that falls within the analytical categories discussed above, with the prevalence of the [...]

It is easy to see the effects of cyber-bullying but it is hard to find out who is the bully making it hard for authorities to pin the blame on the perpetrator of a crime [...]

In addition, the arrest can be made without a warrant if, a person commits the offense in the presence of a law enforcement officer.

Terms like police misconduct and corruption are used to describe the situation when police officers abuse their authority, driven by greed, desire for personal gain, ignorance, prejudice, and malicious intent.

The Court decided that there were objective markers of society's new preferences and standards, such as the fact that only a minority of the US States permitted the death penalty for the mentally retarded. Moreover, [...]

Law enforcement agencies will have challenges with legal requirements and privacy issues in operating vehicles that demand law enforcement agency compliance.

In a legal sense, the defendant was not aware of either the actions or the legality of the actions that they committed during their period of automatism.

This therefore means that punishment will only be done ones and in case the offender is tried again, it will be considered as double jeopardy.

In this way, it is possible to reduce the number of inmates in state prisons because studies have shown that low-level offenders make more than 55% of the total number of inmates in American prisons.

Despite the doubtless coherency of the argument and reasonability of the claims, Martinson's article has a number of problems, which brings the significance of the results a few notches down.

The initial stage in which discretion is applied in the system of criminal justice is where police officers make a decision on whether a suspect should be arrested for a particular offense or not., argues [...]

In the process of conducting the investigation, the prosecutor- and the entire investigative team- must realize that they are yet to prove the crime committed by the suspect.

According to Al-Kisswani, the Presumption of Innocence Law is used to ensure that there is fairness in the process of prosecution, and that the accused will only be considered guilty after the prosecution has proven [...]

For example, it is claimed that one of the reasons why the developing nations have economies that perform poorly is because of the high rate of corruption among the public officials.

Instead of reporting to the police, the patient opted to report to a female nurse in the morning, and she cleaned and changed the clothes of the victim hence erasing all the forensic evidence that [...]

Therefore, facts on crimes and decisions of the judge is referenced from the constitution, which prescribes the nature and extend of the punishment or fine awarded to an individual found guilty of an offense. One [...]

It was found that overcrowding contributed to the reduction of the mental well-being of prisoners and the correctional staff; nevertheless, there was no relationship between the decrease in crime rates and the increase in the [...]

War on Drugs was a set of policies adopted by the Nixon administration in 1971, following a tremendous growth of the local illegal drug market in the 1960s, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.

The major issues faced by the officers include large caseloads, underfunding, lack of capacity and rigid correctional system, and the use of outdated technology. Employment policy: The policy should be based on a workable ratio [...]

In a country that is prone to gun violence, like the United States, tourists would be scared of the unconcealed guns that the police carry around, mainly in the airports.

The dependent variable is the crime rate and robbery rate in the US. This study recommends that cities in the West implement to curb the problem of robbery and high crime rates.