Criminal Law Essay Examples and Topics

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

The work of police officers and other personnel in criminal justice requires proof and accuracy in determining the cause and effects of a crime.

If one is to discuss the issue with the senior management of the organization in which the crime occurred, there is a high chance that the issue will not be taken as seriously due to [...]

The case of murder of JonBenet Ramsey is one of most mysterious episodes in the American criminology, and this report is the attempt to bring some light to the case based on the mistakes made [...]

CCTV cameras are also used in places of work to aid employers to monitor their employees' activities, improve productivity and security, and reduce theft.

The rise of Internet technology gave way to numerous challenges, and one of them is the spreading of cyberbullying. Recent data show that there is a clear gender distinction in terms of the perpetrators and [...]

In the particular case under analysis the issue, which is presented to the court, is the admissibility of the evidence. As Melear states in her article, if the weapon which was not used in the [...]

Although one of the mandates of the NYPD includes preventing crime from occurring by deploying legal means, this paper questions the legal and ethical foundation of the 'stop and frisk' law applied by the NYPD. [...]

The accused is alleged to have injured his wife due to careless driving that resulted in the demise of the unborn child, consequently a successful escape of the son unhurt.

According to the defense side of the case, the warrant that was obtained by the detectives only covered the investigation on the residence. For instance, they collected the evidence without a search warrant.

On the other hand, the hands-on doctrine, known as the inmates' rights era, was a reaction to the harsh conditions and abuse prevalent in many correctional facilities in the mid-twentieth century.

Her contributions to the inmate's bail payment also constitute financial support of the Latin Kings criminal group, which is incompatible with the corrections officer's duty to the law enforcement system. The slippery slope theory finds [...]

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

In the end, it was an electrician who identified the typical signs of abuse in Daniel that finally led police to investigate, thereby exposing the weakness and ineffectiveness of the Dual Track System; the child [...]

In particular, according to the TechFite case, one example of a breach of duty of care might be the insufficient attention of the Security Analyst to the operations of the Application Division, which has led [...]

The role of the police in the society is central when it comes to ensuring law and order. The policing task is the most prominent manifestation of the government and is easily recognizable by members [...]

One of the key causes of overcrowding is the continuing growth in the population of criminals sent to jail. The people have had to wait for their trial turn, and the only place to wait [...]

Finding the poison that Juan bought to poison his mother-in-law and kept somewhere in his car could be a significant piece of evidence.

The bullet trajectory includes the progress of the bullet through the barrel of the gun following discharge or detonation and its pathway both through the air and the aim.

It happened because of the huge differences between how the state viewed the law enforcement agent's actions and how the defense tried to protect the plaintiff.

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

Parents should be held responsible for the crime of their children because in most cases criminal involvement of children is the result of lack of parental control.

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

During the trial, the Tennessee preacher's wife claimed that her partner had been abusing her both sexually and physically for a long time. Mary's mental condition and responsibility for the crime were mitigating factors that [...]

One of the most essential arguments against the RA 10175 is the statement that the Act introduces a severe punishment for libel.

Nevertheless, such a claim is questionable because it is the same constitution that has a bill of rights indicating that it is the right of every citizen to be protected and to live.

In prisons, the young people are taught to be responsible for their deeds in the society they live in, they are taught to avoid their involvement in criminal activities. The educational programs available in the [...]

Cases of murder falls in the rule of felony murder which is well stipulated by the constitution of any given country and the penalty is administered depending on whether the case was committed in an [...]

Additionally, the judge addresses the jury concerning the case by offering them the mandate to exonerate the dependant in case of a logical query.

In this regard, the criminal justice system possesses the power to control crime and punish those who violate the law. The chapter attempts to familiarize the readers with the structure and function of the criminal [...]

One thing that must be cleared to all is that it is not our view that the poor people are all guiltless victims who suffer the persecution of the rich people but it is said [...]

The writer suggests that even if the call for tougher penalties is seen as the answer to the problem, those calling for these penalties are not necessarily affected by the rising crime. There is need [...]

Mills rightly points out that the very grounds of humanity used to support the removal of the death penalty should also be the ones used to support retaining of the sentence.

Once inside the courtroom, he sits at the bench facing the rest of the court.the defense lawyers sit in the left side of the court, close to the dock, while the prosecution sits on the [...]

The least in ranking is crimes against public order for they have no serious repercussions to lives and livelihood of the involved people.

In criminal justice management, there are times that a person may be detained under the control of the police/ criminal justice system not because he has been proved to have committed a crime but because [...]

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

However, the court upheld that in line with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, the security agents had to prove that they had a legitimate lead making them believe that the particular vehicle had contraband [...]

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

For the case of murder or crimes that necessitate capital punishment, the incentive to commit murder is directly related to the uncertainties that punishments for the crime will generate.

The paper will examine the background of the case in addition to the legal point at issue and the decision of the court.

Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed [...]

Meanwhile, Dempsey and Forst assume that discretion is particularly vital in the context of the police officers' activity. Despite the ambiguous character of the discretion outcomes, there is a series of reasons that explain the [...]

A judge may impose a penalty on the perpetrator according to the severity of the crime. In such instances, a convicted must pay a certain amount of money to the court.

In the movie, the conventional retributive system of justice is used to deal with the case of sexual assault. Taking into consideration the seriousness of the crimes, it seems not relevant to apply the restorative [...]

This paper argues that trying juveniles in the same manner as adults is not a deterrent to criminal activities as it might harden the hearts of the children so convicted.

The Exclusionary rule is based on the rights granted to the United States citizens by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution that was designed to protect the right of the American citizens "to be secure [...]

The paper at hand is devoted to the investigation of the life, personality, and criminal behavior of one of the most notorious American serial killers of 1980s-1990s, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer.

Privatization of the prisons may allow the prisons to expand faster because the private sector has the financial ability for the same.

Al-Kisswani says, "Islamic law has dedicated many principles and rules based on the Presumption of Innocence Law or the assurance of it whether it is related to the right of the defense or the right [...]

This paper seeks to define fraud, look at the types of fraud and the consequences of fraud to financial systems. Such fraud denies qualified job seekers places in such companies and this increases the number [...]

The relationship between corporal punishment and naughty behaviors portrays chicken-egg relationship in that, it is difficult to establish which one of two comes first.

The Court decided that there were objective markers of society's new preferences and standards, such as the fact that only a minority of the US States permitted the death penalty for the mentally retarded. Moreover, [...]

It is noted also that Mohamed rejected the police demands and "continued to advance on the victim and was shot by officers".

Mass incarceration in the United States of America is considered one of the most important problems and the number of prisoners continues to increase.

Because hate crimes are associated with the violation of the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association, it is believed that the motive for hate crimes is a crime itself.

The officer should also package information in a way that it is easy to decode and understand. Such communication enables police officers in charge of the inmates to access important information from them.

Therefore, this story of Noah becomes the tale of resilience and self-preservation in the face of competing demands and adverse factors.

The central values of the US criminal justice system are to protect the rights of citizens and ensure the safety of a society in which everyone is equal before the law.

In as much as some human rights activists often complain of the violation of the rights by the justice system, India's criminal system has faced significant changes since colonial times to the present.

Still, the court authorities denied him a request to listen and consider the testimony of a witness or an accomplice, because of which the court's verdict turned in the opposite direction.

The practical experiences of the proceedings both confirmed and challenged some of the information that I have learned about the structure of a trial.

In the given case, Christopher Watts, a 33-year-old man residing in Frederick, the state of Colorado, was a defendant. Initially, Christopher Watts rejected his involvement in the deaths of his wife and daughters.

Organic evidence is obtained from the body of the victim or the perpetrator's body. At other times the evidence may be interfered with when chemical compounds are used near the crime scene to conceal the [...]

The initial stage in which discretion is applied in the system of criminal justice is where police officers make a decision on whether a suspect should be arrested for a particular offense or not., argues [...]

According to Holmes and Holmes, the majority of child predators "had some form of child pornography in their possession at the time of arrest".

Cheney's Law is a step by step account of the actions taken by Vice President Dick Cheney to enhance the executive power of the president, as the Commander in Chief in times of war.

The same society and government also receive the output of the law enforcement organizations, meaning that the activity of the criminal justice system is never focused unto itself.

The court case of the appellant in the face of the People of the State of New York and the respondent in the face of Bernhard Goetz was argued and decided in the year 1986.

Even though it is not a direct representation of sexual harassment, this aspect of the issue cannot be ignored because employees have access to social media not only at home but also in the workplace.

The problem analyzed in the current paper is the impact of probation on the work of the officers engaged in this system.

It describes the civil forfeiture in admiralty law that is connected with the stop and search of the King Diamond II by the Navy ship while it was in the international waters, during which a [...]

The cases of female sex offenders are not unknown to the society; for example, a high school or college teacher that was accused of student's sex abuse and confronts the criminal justice system.

As a result, courts are empowered to use the law to defend the weak and defenseless in society. All judicial officers and other professionals that work in the justice system are required to adhere to [...]

Before coming up with ways and measures of curbing identity theft that may be targeted on the executives, it is necessary to identify the modes and means by which the theft may be executed.

Therefore, facts on crimes and decisions of the judge is referenced from the constitution, which prescribes the nature and extend of the punishment or fine awarded to an individual found guilty of an offense. One [...]

Officers in such a culture are educated on how to see the warning indications of domestic abuse, are encouraged to sympathize with victims, and are expected to take swift action to stop the violence.

The proposed intervention is the implementation of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries program by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which, when applied to healthcare professionals, offers a set of tools meant [...]

The paper is based on the analysis of the sixth Amendment approach to Interrogations and Confessions and the effective proof of the amendment.

Policing became a legitimate practice in the eyes of the public. The focus of Peelian principles is on preventing crime and not necessarily catching criminals in the act.

In the United States, civil litigation takes place in normal courts however it is strictly guided by formal and exhaustive rules of civil procedures; one rule that has been adopted in the system is civil [...]

It was brought to the attention of the judge that a week before Caroline was found dead, she had been seen in the company of the accused at a city fitness centre.

In this case, 38 neighbors committed an act of omission by not reporting this ordeal to the police. The main advantage of charging bystanders is to make sure that people do not tolerate crime as [...]

A charge bargain occurs in situation where a prosecutor offers the accused an opportunity to plead to a lesser charge or in situation where the accused has a number of charges to plead guilty to [...]

Police obtained a blood fingerprint from the defendant's room and were able to match the fingerprint to the defendant and the blood to the victim.

In addition, it is necessary to edit the research question/hypothesis after reviewing the literature and determining variables; select the research method; sampling methods and control of variables should be thoroughly explained as well; description of [...]

The argument advanced by conflict theorists states that the many laws imposed on street offenders are mainly to be the gain of the elites.

The two approaches to criminal justice are in a normative state and there is always a risk of seeing one or the other as better or worse depending on the application.

In addition, the arrest can be made without a warrant if, a person commits the offense in the presence of a law enforcement officer.

Opponents of arming teachers have argued that this action would be a distraction since the primary role of teachers is to teach.

In this way, Ewing wanted to prove that the decision made by the court violated the Eighth Amendment and had to be altered because it was cruel.

The main reason for the enactment of the legislation was to send dangerous criminals to prison to improve the safety of people in communities.

Upon discussing the impact of money laundering, illegal drugs, and prostitution, the paper proposes the issuing of a court order restraining the use of wealth acquired from victimless crimes as one of the approaches to [...]

The elements of proof for arson include motive, evidence of ownership, malicious intent, and presence of fire. The elements necessary to prove arson include malicious conduct, presence of fire, and ownership of property.

The death of Kitty Genovese was one of the horrendous acts have that ever happened in the history of crime. Nevertheless, in the case of Genovese, the incapability of the witnesses to respond to the [...]

This case started as an effort to "free seven American hostages in Iran under the custody of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution".

Since penitentiaries began in each of the states in the United States of America, there has been a sharp increase in the number of prisoners in state prisons. The other factor contributing to the growth [...]

On the one hand, the difficulty is that the offender and victim are spouses. To conclude, the court should reject the case and evidence from Perez because it neither excuses the offender's behavior in the [...]

Moreover, trace evidence can provide a link between a victim and a suspect if it exists or conclude about the victim or suspect and a scene.

Therefore, studying the processes that take place before the trial is important for understanding the overall delivery of criminal justice. Before the trial begins, the defense attorney and the prosecutor must prepare for it.

The role of discretion is to provide the capacity to make official judgments based on logic and judgment in the criminal justice system.

About a block down the street, it begins to sprinkle and Latisha opens the umbrella and realizes that it is not hers.

The possibility of a commutation of the sentence is the primary motivation of the accused to plead guilty to a crime.

However, the misguided notion that anything with the potential to cause harm is immoral has led to the limited effectiveness of punitive policies with regard to the reduction of the negative impacts of drug use.

It included the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Case's interpretation for extending the protections of the Bill of the Rights to states.

Offenders have a strong incentive in being members of the Drug Court in that they have the prospect of avoiding being in jail for as long as they abide by the rules and cooperate in [...]

The characteristics of Godse, the motive, and his actions will be looked at to establish the conditions of the case. On that day, Gandhi was getting prepared to unveil his plans to the congress, and [...]

The fifth one includes the targeted issues while the sixth indicates the decisions and actions. It is also appropriate to be aware of the speech mode of the individual being interviewed.

Evidence-based practice in the criminal justice sector has concentrated on policies that deal with the administration of these sectors based on the correctional process of the incarcerated persons.

Other than the problem of failure to complete jail terms, overcrowding in prisons called for the building of more prisoners to accommodate a large number of prisoners and this translated to heavy costs to the [...]

The same brokers are responsible in mediating deals and ways of transferring to the countries that are referred to as not stable or even to terrorist organizations and gangs deemed to be dangerous to the [...]

The preceding level of severe felonies in the United States was critical, and the community considered the three strikes laws enrollment a necessity.

Overall, it can be argued that the Mapp v Ohio ruling dramatically changed the operations and behavior of state police officers by putting a stop to the admission of evidence obtained by a search in [...]

As the review of self-defense, provocation, and diminished responsibility revealed, they refer to different circumstances in which full or partial defense may be given to an accused who committed a homicide unintentionally.

The author of the book is one of the most renowned lawyers in the USA, and he tells his story, as well as stories of his clients, in his book.

In my opinion, exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule should only be made in the few cases where there is no other way to obtain evidence and only on the grounds of the probable cause, supported [...]

Instead of reporting to the police, the patient opted to report to a female nurse in the morning, and she cleaned and changed the clothes of the victim hence erasing all the forensic evidence that [...]

As mentioned in the introduction, building more prisons is just one of the many solutions to the problem of overcrowding in prisons.

This sentence assumes that there are sufficient reasons to kill a criminal and that there is no possibility that the case can be readdressed.