Criminal Law Essay Examples and Topics

The accused is alleged to have injured his wife due to careless driving that resulted in the demise of the unborn child, consequently a successful escape of the son unhurt.

The case of murder of JonBenet Ramsey is one of most mysterious episodes in the American criminology, and this report is the attempt to bring some light to the case based on the mistakes made [...]

The work of police officers and other personnel in criminal justice requires proof and accuracy in determining the cause and effects of a crime.

If one is to discuss the issue with the senior management of the organization in which the crime occurred, there is a high chance that the issue will not be taken as seriously due to [...]

The rise of Internet technology gave way to numerous challenges, and one of them is the spreading of cyberbullying. Recent data show that there is a clear gender distinction in terms of the perpetrators and [...]

However, the court upheld that in line with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, the security agents had to prove that they had a legitimate lead making them believe that the particular vehicle had contraband [...]

In this regard, the criminal justice system possesses the power to control crime and punish those who violate the law. The chapter attempts to familiarize the readers with the structure and function of the criminal [...]

Violet Amirault, the owner of the daycare center, was accused of abusing eighteen children and condemned to twenty years in prison.

However, the length of his sentence in a high-security prison remains the will of his persecutor, which is demonstrative of the complicated nature of justice.

Because hate crimes are associated with the violation of the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association, it is believed that the motive for hate crimes is a crime itself.

CCTV cameras are also used in places of work to aid employers to monitor their employees' activities, improve productivity and security, and reduce theft.

Parents should be held responsible for the crime of their children because in most cases criminal involvement of children is the result of lack of parental control.

In legal terms, the key difference between the two was that the Africans from Amistad were freeborn and enslaved in violation of the international agreements, while Dred Scott, despite his sojourn in Illinois, was born [...]

Policing became a legitimate practice in the eyes of the public. The focus of Peelian principles is on preventing crime and not necessarily catching criminals in the act.

In the particular case under analysis the issue, which is presented to the court, is the admissibility of the evidence. As Melear states in her article, if the weapon which was not used in the [...]

Considering that any form of employee theft induces substantial harm to the financial performance of companies, the integration of adequate crime prevention procedures in the corporate security system is of great importance.

In the end, it was an electrician who identified the typical signs of abuse in Daniel that finally led police to investigate, thereby exposing the weakness and ineffectiveness of the Dual Track System; the child [...]

To prevent and lessen the frequency of mass shootings and other forms of community violence, the current gun laws in the United States need to be updated, made harsher, and regulated more intensely.

Therefore, this story of Noah becomes the tale of resilience and self-preservation in the face of competing demands and adverse factors.

There was a sense of belief among Stephens and Dudley that their act of cannibalism would not result in persecution due to the custom of the sea.

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

Even though it is not a direct representation of sexual harassment, this aspect of the issue cannot be ignored because employees have access to social media not only at home but also in the workplace.

In the country, purchasing rifles and ammunition is not as simple due to the regulations guiding the sale of the weapons.

In as much as some human rights activists often complain of the violation of the rights by the justice system, India's criminal system has faced significant changes since colonial times to the present.

Finding the poison that Juan bought to poison his mother-in-law and kept somewhere in his car could be a significant piece of evidence.

The initial stage in which discretion is applied in the system of criminal justice is where police officers make a decision on whether a suspect should be arrested for a particular offense or not., argues [...]

The problem analyzed in the current paper is the impact of probation on the work of the officers engaged in this system.

The officer should also package information in a way that it is easy to decode and understand. Such communication enables police officers in charge of the inmates to access important information from them.

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems provides a comprehensive overview of the differences between the criminal justice systems in the US and the UK.

On the other hand, the hands-on doctrine, known as the inmates' rights era, was a reaction to the harsh conditions and abuse prevalent in many correctional facilities in the mid-twentieth century.

This paper argues that trying juveniles in the same manner as adults is not a deterrent to criminal activities as it might harden the hearts of the children so convicted.

In prisons, the young people are taught to be responsible for their deeds in the society they live in, they are taught to avoid their involvement in criminal activities. The educational programs available in the [...]

The bullet trajectory includes the progress of the bullet through the barrel of the gun following discharge or detonation and its pathway both through the air and the aim.

Offenders have a strong incentive in being members of the Drug Court in that they have the prospect of avoiding being in jail for as long as they abide by the rules and cooperate in [...]

According to authorities and international organizations such as the UN, human trafficking for sexual exploitation in India is mainly internal with the country low income and lower cast communities providing the major source of victims. [...]

Mills rightly points out that the very grounds of humanity used to support the removal of the death penalty should also be the ones used to support retaining of the sentence.

For the case of murder or crimes that necessitate capital punishment, the incentive to commit murder is directly related to the uncertainties that punishments for the crime will generate.

While both cases share some similarities, such as the age of the victims and perpetrators, the differences in the cases, such as the severity of the assaults and the community response, demonstrate the unique challenges [...]

Officers in such a culture are educated on how to see the warning indications of domestic abuse, are encouraged to sympathize with victims, and are expected to take swift action to stop the violence.

He was accused of breaking the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1974 and money laundering by the U.S.attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.

In particular, according to the TechFite case, one example of a breach of duty of care might be the insufficient attention of the Security Analyst to the operations of the Application Division, which has led [...]

The "snitches" work by pretending to be part of felonious groups while secretly reporting the proceedings to police forces like the FBI. The spies' ability to acquire first-hand evidence from the apparent offenders makes the [...]

In a legal sense, the defendant was not aware of either the actions or the legality of the actions that they committed during their period of automatism.

A judge may impose a penalty on the perpetrator according to the severity of the crime. In such instances, a convicted must pay a certain amount of money to the court.

It is noted also that Mohamed rejected the police demands and "continued to advance on the victim and was shot by officers".

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

According to the defense side of the case, the warrant that was obtained by the detectives only covered the investigation on the residence. For instance, they collected the evidence without a search warrant.

As the review of self-defense, provocation, and diminished responsibility revealed, they refer to different circumstances in which full or partial defense may be given to an accused who committed a homicide unintentionally.

Opponents of arming teachers have argued that this action would be a distraction since the primary role of teachers is to teach.

The model enforces the law through dialogue between the offenders and the law enforcers' agencies. The police and courts are the main bodies in the conflict control model of criminal justice.

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

While harsh punishments appear to offer a solution to the problem, this measure may be detrimental to the welfare of the child in the case where the abuser is its guardian.

The aim of the analysis will be to determine whether there is a relationship between the X-variables and Y-variables as hypothesised.

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

The United States Supreme Court announced that a person accused of a crime and cannot afford to pay for lawyers to represent them has the right to an attorney. According to the Court, Gideon had [...]

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

In the given case, Christopher Watts, a 33-year-old man residing in Frederick, the state of Colorado, was a defendant. Initially, Christopher Watts rejected his involvement in the deaths of his wife and daughters.

It included the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Case's interpretation for extending the protections of the Bill of the Rights to states.

The objective of this thesis is to understand the significance of sexual offences, how they take place, what kind of research goes into hunting down the sexual predators and the legal ruling in the United [...]

Moreover, a prosecutor also needs to prove that the accused had the intent to act, or go through with the plan, and the intent to kill, and not merely maim or disfigure the victim.

Therefore, the quality of the criminal law system directly affects the stability, order, and organization in the society because the main purpose of the criminal law is to provide principles of justice according to which [...]

Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed [...]

The argument advanced by conflict theorists states that the many laws imposed on street offenders are mainly to be the gain of the elites.

The case had gone through the plea hearing, the preliminary hearing the trial hearing and was to be decided on this day during the sentencing hearing where the judge was supposed to deliver the Judgment.

In the law of torts, 'harm' is considered when there is physical invasion to a person there fore in the case there was no violation of this law as the secretary was not harmed by [...]

As a value preference, it is worth noting that future trends in international law will opt to affix and punish individuals for crimes against humanity and war crimes and hence diminish the concept of collective [...]

It is easy to see the effects of cyber-bullying but it is hard to find out who is the bully making it hard for authorities to pin the blame on the perpetrator of a crime [...]

In the same year they wrote the book 'What is to be Done About Law and Order?' They said that criminology errs in assuming crime is not connected to social and economic problems in a [...]

Regarding the increased complexity of relations in the modern world, there are civil and criminal laws that exist to differentiate various cases and introduce appropriate punishments for lawbreakers not insulting their basic rights and preserving [...]

Mass incarceration in the United States of America is considered one of the most important problems and the number of prisoners continues to increase.

Upon discussing the impact of money laundering, illegal drugs, and prostitution, the paper proposes the issuing of a court order restraining the use of wealth acquired from victimless crimes as one of the approaches to [...]

The major issues faced by the officers include large caseloads, underfunding, lack of capacity and rigid correctional system, and the use of outdated technology. Employment policy: The policy should be based on a workable ratio [...]

Terms like police misconduct and corruption are used to describe the situation when police officers abuse their authority, driven by greed, desire for personal gain, ignorance, prejudice, and malicious intent.

Reports show that the crime is on the rise because more people have access to computers and the internet than ever before.

In the first place, according to the Code of Ethics, the police officer has to be a representative of the law enforcement system and "protect the constitutional safeguards".

In covering the benefits and shortcomings of sex tourism, the paper will try to establish whether sex tourism is something that is ethical and desirable in society. The analyses of the legal aspect of sex [...]

This paper discusses the use of force by law enforcement officers and attempts to explain why it is necessary to allow the use of force in the enforcement of law and administration of justice.

When it comes to the primary source of law, common law is mainly based on the customs in a society while civil law originates from written code that is provided by rulers and legislators.

In the process of conducting the investigation, the prosecutor- and the entire investigative team- must realize that they are yet to prove the crime committed by the suspect.

However, the police said the arrest warrant allowed them to search the house without his consent. To clarify their point, they said if the police had arrested the suspect at his workplace, they would have [...]

The information is contaminated and made in such a way that the innocent suspect is the true perpetrator of the crime.

Before coming up with ways and measures of curbing identity theft that may be targeted on the executives, it is necessary to identify the modes and means by which the theft may be executed.

Cases of murder falls in the rule of felony murder which is well stipulated by the constitution of any given country and the penalty is administered depending on whether the case was committed in an [...]

Community service is one of the punishments used for the petty offenders to pay the community back for the trouble they caused.

The survival of any civilization hinges on the establishment of laws and codes of conduct and the subsequent obeying of the same by the society's members.

The officer may also make a surprise visit to the offender's home or workplace during the rehabilitation period to check the progress of the offender that has been observed by the relatives and the workmates.

Other states, like Florida, have defined that third-degree murder exists, but it does not differ much from second-degree murder, as the cause can include depraved heart and felony murder.

Parole is a right granted by the government to a convicted individual for breaking the law in order to reduce their time in confinement or release them before the end of the legally prescribed sentence.

As a result of the criminal allure it exudes, the Cosa Nostra maintains connections with all of the major criminal groups, both in Italy and across the world.

Various ethical issues such as the code of silence, the mental status of the offender, and limited evidence play a vital role in challenging the discretion of police officers in arresting the DV perpetrators.

The case of discrimination on the basis of sex in the form of sexual harassment was brought by the plaintiff. In addition, compensation of $34 million was paid to the victims.

The theory of ethical formalism that is represented in the works of Immanuel Kant and John Rawls argues that "the only thing truly good is goodwill, and that what is good is that which conforms [...]

Even though the suspect did not obligate to the offense, he had the objective to do so, and hence the punishment ought to be the same.

The given case will be analyzed from the perspective of Agnew's General Strain Theory, which was built upon the ideas of Merton's Strain Theory. Agnew's general strain theory fails to explain the magnitude and range [...]

The recognition that Thelma and Louise get when they become the ones who occupy the traditionally male roles is what might make the audience think about the irrational approach of the community to numerous issues [...]

From an information perspective, it is clear that new technologies, such as the use of iris recognition solutions, can assist in the effective and efficient management of correctional systems since these facilities are predominantly information-centric [...]

In spite of the significance of the chain of custody, in some cases, the practice may not be necessary, in case a piece of substantial evidence is received by the prosecution.

Although one of the mandates of the NYPD includes preventing crime from occurring by deploying legal means, this paper questions the legal and ethical foundation of the 'stop and frisk' law applied by the NYPD. [...]

The least in ranking is crimes against public order for they have no serious repercussions to lives and livelihood of the involved people.

Other than the problem of failure to complete jail terms, overcrowding in prisons called for the building of more prisoners to accommodate a large number of prisoners and this translated to heavy costs to the [...]

Proof has to be shown that the conduct of the defendant was the resultant cause of the victims' death and that it was due to negligence.

Some parts of the criminal code are filled with useless and obsolete statutes which should be repealed or abolished and replaced with legislation that would serve the society of today in a better way.

The two approaches to criminal justice are in a normative state and there is always a risk of seeing one or the other as better or worse depending on the application.

The other dimension presents the argument that the laws are meant for the well being of the pepole articulating that the legislation is in fact designed for the protection of the civil rights of the [...]

The same society and government also receive the output of the law enforcement organizations, meaning that the activity of the criminal justice system is never focused unto itself.

One of the most essential arguments against the RA 10175 is the statement that the Act introduces a severe punishment for libel.

The court case of the appellant in the face of the People of the State of New York and the respondent in the face of Bernhard Goetz was argued and decided in the year 1986.

The first one is the following: should the psychological effect caused by rape be considered as the justification for the lack of malice aforethought?

It is the duty of the investigating officer to advise the subject that constrained responses would not be admissible in future hearings by a jurist.

It is interested in the fluidity of one's behavior and the process of change. The authors point out that while other factors are also crucial to the process of developing offending behavior, one's ethnicity and [...]

It describes the civil forfeiture in admiralty law that is connected with the stop and search of the King Diamond II by the Navy ship while it was in the international waters, during which a [...]

The fact that he was put under his mother's care is rather surprising because she failed to take care of him as he was a child and suffered from a mental disease.

The paper at hand is devoted to the investigation of the life, personality, and criminal behavior of one of the most notorious American serial killers of 1980s-1990s, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer.

In the case of Kris, it is clear that he is 25 years. The intention is to match the offender with the needs and level of supervision required.

Promises of a good life and the absence of education opportunities for women have led to the increased levels of human trafficking.

The main hindrances reducing the effectiveness of the method significantly are inaccuracy of the state registries' databases and certain level of naivety of the laws, focused on punishment of the previous crimes instead of preventing [...]

According to the parameters used in the grant process, it is obligatory that the organization should use novel equipment in promoting decision making and operations in the organization.

A Presentation of the Mission Statement of the Social Agency The parole agency in the United States has an important role on the security well being and the freedom of the inmates.

On the other hand, the executive branch is mandated with the role of furnishing the criminal justice system with judges and heads of law-enforcing agencies.