The possible risk posed to the public was examined using the security laws that are used in each of the 49 countries when there is an initial public offering.
In the case of Gramsci, the Court ruled that it was appropriate to pierce the corporate veil of Stepanovs so that Gramsci could enforce terms of the agreement under the contract.
Definition of the Standard of Fair and Equitable Treatment The standard of fair and equitable treatment protects global investment treaties. Development of the Principle of Fair and Equitable Treatment In this section, we examine the [...]
As the judge in the case, I would rule in favor of the plaintiff and oblige the defendant to pay for the damages as requested.
The other issue was that the company had failed to keep the promise of ensuring privacy, confidentiality, and the termination of employees based on the intercepted emails.
In the law of contracts, when a contract is rescinded, it means that the two parties to the contract have been relieved of their obligation in relation to the initial contract entered in the initial [...]
The company is involved in several activities within the energy sector especially exploration of gas and oil, refinery and distribution of the same, generation of power and in retailing of gas and petroleum products.
The subsequent reluctance to alert its clients of the stated defects in its vehicles publicly, and denial of the existence of the same defects make Toyota Motor Corporation culpable, and the ensuing product liability lawsuits [...]
The three main areas of economic loss are earning loss in the past and future, probable pecuniary losses, household loses. It measured by the plaintiff's diminished power and capacity in the future and past that [...]
It was therefore necessary for the plaintiffs to be compensated for the economic risk they were placed in by the state of their house.
Additionally, the available resources that franchises are willing to invest in a person will make this form of business the best one.
Some of the reasons for the existence of the doctrine of vicarious responsibility include the assumption that the employer controls the actions of the employees, and thus s/he should be held responsible.
The paper covers ethical issues in the application of employers' vicarious liability, the application of the principals' vicarious liability, the application of vicarious liability of corporations in tort, in vicarious employees' continued liability and indemnity, [...]
Therefore, much concern is specifically connected with the quality of the product and negligent attitude of the family to warnings of the personnel concerning the risk of using specific services on the territory of the [...]
As a form of a case law, product liability ensures that manufacturers, distributors as well as the retailers of a product bear responsibility in the event that a product that they offer to the market [...]
According to the Residential Landlord and Tenant law, the property owner may have to evict the new occupant because the act violates the rights of the first tenant.
The risks relating to the quality of the job will be determined by the outcome of the refurbishment. This principle of allocation will ensure that the contractor aligns his refurbishment team with the performance goals [...]
This is a type of funding request contract wherein in return for services rendered, an employee of a company is entitled under the stipulations indicated within their primary employment contract to request funds from the [...]
Particularly, the definition of the main aspects of the agreement: offer and acceptance, considerations, legal purposes, and legal power of the contract.
Wal-Mart is an example of a company that has been reported to contravene the provisions of the antitrust laws. This gives the monopsonist the opportunity to dictate the market by offering low prices to suppliers.
The legality of the activities according to federal, state, and local laws should follow the principle of good governance through honesty and good faith.
According to Figueroa, task details an inputted by the service beneficiary may include exact location for easy delivery of goods and services; a timeframe within which the task should be carried out and the service [...]
Other sources of international law include declarations of international organizations as well as writings of judges. In international law, intellectual property rights are generally defined as products of the mind.
This necessitated the need for review and revision of the procedures that these firms use to detect fraud in present and future financial audit statements. Regulations in SAS 99 improve necessary procedures involved in the [...]
This paper seeks to establish the fact that corporations operating in the global context have a responsibility to comply with the laws of their host countries.
In this proposal, it shall be argued that the FW Act is a far better legislation for collective bargaining than previous legislations through an analysis of the core values in the legislation and some of [...]
What supporters of tort reform believe in is that the whole idea of reforming tort is contentious since its proponents are only keen on limiting the amount of awards to injure due to personal and [...]
Also, what were the demands of the workers and was it their right to refuse work? In the case of Eads, it has the responsibility to provide a safe and equal work environment to all [...]
The fact of the agreement was that the defendant had a prior knowledge of restrictions stipulated in the agreement with the claimant.
In review of the Case involving Drive Yourself Company and the minor, it is evident that the company acted on negligence when making the recruitment of the new driver.
In most of the fraud cases in an organization, the master planners are the employees or people who understand the operation procedures of the organization well.
Plaintiff and defendant The potential plaintiff in the tort case is the SureCo Company. Elements of slander that constitutes the plaintiff's claim The actions of Raul satisfy the essential elements of a slander.
The operator of the pink monorail survived the incident unscathed because he was backing up the monorail and therefore it was the tail-end of the vehicle that collided with the purple monorail.
In this case, the defendant contributed to the plaintiff's loss by selling a car with faulty dashboard compass to the plaintiff.
It is reasonable to mark that the profession of an insurance agent requires the skills to sell insurance and promote the services of the company for the probable clients to apply.
When signing an insurance policy, there are some conditions that are special to a particular case, in the case that they offer some duty of care to the policyholder, then in case of an incidence [...]
In order for such contracts to satisfy the statute of frauds, there must be a signed document which can reasonably identify the subject of the contract, outline that a contract has been entered into by [...]
In other words, she is entitled to challenge the directive requiring her to transport the patients without any fear of termination since the directive compromises not only her own safety but the safety of others [...]
Ruling: The criminal court of appeals of Texas held that the evidence was sufficient in establishing that the appellant knew the content and character of the video tape and thus affirmed the conviction.
To mitigate this, governments have in the recent past established legislations that seek to protect employees from such discriminations when it comes to employment, promotions, demotions and rewards.
However, he can take it a step further and prove that the dismissal was also unfair due to the circumstances of the case.
The theory of objectivity in a contract implies that for an offer and acceptance to take place, the reasonableness of the offer and acceptance should be considered, thus other than the mutual consent of the [...]
However, this does not negate the fact that bribery is a violation of a legal and ethical principle in the society.