Constitutional Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 2

Since the use of Tasers is unavoidable, there is the need to ensure the most efficient use of Tasers while minimizing the risks of health complications or death.

Non-originalism allows for flexibility with regard to interpretation of the constitution, facilitates the evolution of the constitution in order to deal with contemporary issues, and prioritizes the role of the constitution in protecting individual liberty.

The constitution of any given region gives the citizen the right to life, freedom of speech, freedom of movement, political freedom, and freedom of the press among others.

Although most individuals may argue that, the nature of available evidence is the primary determinant of any court outcome; which to some extent is true, it is important to note that, the sitting judges have [...]

This aspect of the disagreement between them had implications for their views on class-based differences in the right to be called virtuous and common citizens' right to designate representatives.

The institution was designed as a check on the power of the legislative and the executive branches of the federal government.

Being a representative of the Republican party, Roberts can be viewed as one of the supporters of its views in the court.

If over 50% of them vote for impeachment, the president will be impeached, and the case will be passed to the Senate for trial.

There are many loopholes used to evade the jurisdiction of the fourth amendment thus it can be argued that it does not provide sufficient protection to U.S.citizens. It is a big problem when police officers [...]

For a long time, legal practice in Saudi Arabia has not been fully operational despite the issuance of an act that allowed the practice in 2001 A.D.

The seat theory is based on the concept that an arbitration is overseen by the legislation of the location where it is held, known as the 'seat' or forum of the arbitration, which is the [...]

One of them is known as "taxation without representation," and its applicability to the case is conditional upon the attempts of the president to make Mexico pay for the prospective wall construction.

In some cases, the police may act indecently, which affects the credibility of the evidence and violates the Fourth and/or the Fifth Amendments of the Constitution that are meant to protect individuals.

NAGPRA is part of the extensive debate in the United States between the Native American community and the archaeological community. Walter Echo-Hawk, who acted as the community's spokesperson for this case, said, "The time has [...]

Final Action: subsequent to both the House and Senate accepting a bill in the same shape, it is propelled to the president.

The Constitution of the United States of America is deemed as the supreme law. The Constitution grants rights to the nation of the United States.

The same thing can be said of the outcome of the said law: the exclusionary rule and the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine because the U.S.

Firstly, the correlation between the Fourth Amendment and the actions of the police on private property have to be determined to have a general perception of the allowed actions of the police.

The Supreme Court only stepped in to ensure that the constitutional right to free speech was respected by the by the government and the passing of the First Amendment helped to consolidate the positive support [...]

In as much as the constitution provides for a strict verdict pertaining to continuation of cases, Double Jeopardy Clause is not at all violated in this scenario."Under the certain circumstances two state trials in two [...]

This paper examines the extent to which the Bill of Rights has influenced the way of life of the people of America in line with the Constitution.

It is also the right of the accused to be informed of the right to call witnesses to support his case.

The following discussion and analysis provide a deeper cross-sectional dissection of the case about the fourth amendment In the case of Bailey v United States, the defendant, Bailey was stopped by police officers from the [...]

The specific grounds of inconsistency are that the laws seek to prohibit an attempt to obtain or the actual procurement of an abortion regardless of the circumstances with the exception of the special circumstance of [...]

The Exclusionary Rule is connected to a number of issues including its inability to protect the rights of the citizens on the reason of exclusions, and its hidden costs for the law-enforcement agencies.

However, voluntary arbitration, as explained above, can either be binding or not, where non-binding arbitration is comparable to the ADR model of mediation, in the aspect that the decision made by the arbitrator cannot be [...]

Despite the confusion, many lawyers agree that in order to establish what is reasonable and what is not, the court should evaluate the case on the basis of the following criteria; First, the court should [...]

The statutes include the company law, the law contract and other legal acts. However, the political atmosphere cannot allow the implementation of the law.

The argument is that Murphy was not under arrest at the time of the search and seizure of the fingernail scrapings.

The term preponderance of the evidence means that the side that would provide greater evidence concerning the case would lead either the judge or the jury to take one side as opposed to the other.

It is evident that the evolution of standards that the court has adopted to evaluate the freedom of expression leaves a lot to be desired. The court has attempted to define the role of the [...]

S 643 in which the court held that evidence obtained in contravention of the Fourth Amendment was not admissible in court.

Although there was nobody in the house, some evidence linking the suspect to the murder case was seized by the police during the house inspection.

On the other hand, the legislature has the mandate to formulate laws for the sake of citizens because they are representatives of the people; thus, judicial review of laws, which are passed by the legislature, [...]

The following paper addresses the Act from the perspective of its constitutionality, the measures applicable to judges caught in misconduct and the terms of judges' removal, as well as the terms of appointment.

The local government in Atlanta can be compelled by the court to justify the zoning ordinance if Irene Lopez can demonstrate that it has caused financial losses and contradicts public interest.

This discussion examines the issue of whether some powers of the Congress should be given to individual states and whether states' powers comprising the health, welfare, and morality of the people should be addressed to [...]

In other words, it is believed to be critical that the power capacity is equally spread within the country, and the minority has the same right to shape the decision making process as the majority.

This case was rather complicated, and it started with the class action suit that was filled by twenty children who did not receive an opportunity to enter the school that was near their homes because [...]

According to the traffic law, the relevant organization is supposed to be the source of all traffic laws and law enforcement on all roads, paved and unpaved in the United States.

The primary purpose of the paper is to provide the in-depth analysis regarding a possible decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the case Brown v.

The initial version of the United States Constitution included the provisions that granted authority to the three independent branches of government: the legislative, the judicial, and the executive.

That is why it is now illegal for the officers to conduct a warrantless search if they are convinced that any time wastage would jeopardize their ability to succeed in making an arrest.

In the case under consideration, the police arrested the judge. The right to be represented by the attorney is another part of the Miranda Rights.

Indeed, a closer look at the processes that occur in the court room and in the process of passing the judgment will reveal that the justice's jurisprudential philosophy, in fact, is based on the process [...]

The drafters of the American constitution never saw the importance of including freedom of speech in the country's supreme laws until the First Amendment was made after the revolution.

There have been suggestions to study the inquisitorial system and adopt some of its features that could help to improve the determination of truth under the US adversarial system. It is thus advisable to redesign [...]

The first requirement that should be met in the initialization of the process that sets the stage for the amendment of the constitution is prior notice.

Cyberspace is a common terminology in the computer world that is used to refer to the virtual computer world. There is no restriction to internet usage in the world today as there is the freedom [...]

Judicial review could also refer to the authority that the courts have to review the constitutionality of a given statute. However there were Similarities between the Warren and Burger courts in that both were found [...]

Under custody, the law applies to cases in which the conditions of custody are compromised and to situations where the suspect is held unfairly. The suspect responded with a yes and this was used as [...]

After the bill is introduced, it has to be approved by both houses; the House of Representatives and the senate, for it to become a law.

The information collected includes the details of the offense and the personal details of the suspect. The amount paid for bail varies depending on the crime."In some circumstances, the bail can be revoked and the [...]

In spite of the significance of the awareness of the support for principles of democracy, the degree of support conferred on the democratic norms if they contradict other important principles is relatively more.

The appeal was directed at considering the veto set on the First Reference, by the Quebec Court of Appeal. 3 The answer of the Court of Appeal to the question was negative.

According to legal experts, there is no violation of the Fourth Amendment and asserted that "The Fourth Amendment provides no protection for what a person knowingly exposes to the public.

The first rule that is important and should be applied in the statutory interpretation is the rule of reading the statute literally by taking the plain meaning of the statute.

The first thing that the police authorities must do is to file a First Information Report which details the entire gamut of the professed crime, or offense and inform the suspect about his suspected offense.

In an incident in which the prisoner was searched by a female officer in the absence of a male officer while in prison, the Fourth Amendment of the prisoner was not violated, because the female [...]

Examples of past Acts include the Aquaculture Act of 2001, which was enacted by the Australian parliament to act as a guideline in the handling of issues related to aquatic life, the Adoption Act of [...]

The introduction of the new British Supreme Court has involved different constitutional implications, such as changing the role of the Lord Chancellor and creating a position of President of the Court of England and Wales; [...]

Consequently, the refugee policy comes about due to the flow of obligations courtesy of the 1960 UNHCR Convention, that is to say, the provision of refugees' protection.

The two major democratic principles are closely interrelated and the parties involved into them can actually change places from time to time: the minority has the right to become the majority, thus the latter becomes [...]

Such examples of the Main Law of the country and the Declaration of Peoples' Rights violation as in the case of Dr.

That the actions of the church made the society to have a negative attitude towards the parents. The parents in this case can be said to be the legal owners of the child.

The safeguard of British liberty is in the good sense of the people and in the system of representative and responsible government which has been evolved".[The Business of Judging] Such an approach isolated British constitutional [...]

While considered by the vast majority of Americans as a contemptible act, flag burning is an exercise of the freedom the flag itself represents.

It is not only necessary to have the necessary knowledge about principles and judgments of Constitutional Law by the Supreme Court, but it is also important to know how the Court has arrived at such [...]

The dismissal of the case was based on the fact of infringement of the freedom of expression under s. It can be stated that the dismissal of the appeal was based on the Charter.

American embassy is also responsible for the American citizens protection and promotion of "American business interests throughout the world" Consular officers, in Foreign Service officers, are responsible for the life and health of the American [...]

The United Kingdom enforces different types of laws such as the Statute Laws, European Laws and the Common Laws. Common Laws as opposed to the Statute Laws are the judgments that are passed in the [...]

The Ohio Distinct Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed the appeal on the ground that the Fourth Amendment did not directly regulate the case.

In this regard, below, there is a proposition of a hypothetical modification of the Georgia constitution by the current situation in the United States and the world - for example, it is possible to propose [...]

For me, the Constitution is, first and foremost, the necessary complement to the core values of the Declaration: the notions of equality and irrevocable rights.

The primary aim of the Constitution was to unite the nation and create a number of regulations suitable for all kinds of people, which is why the framers tried to reach compromises in every question.

Following the 9/11 disaster and the PATRIOT Act's passage, the powers of the United States government to conduct surveillance on both citizens and foreign entities expanded dramatically.

The main motive for creating Article III was the desire to protect the judges of the Supreme Court from the need to participate in political events, which excludes their bias.

However, this is the case only "unless school authorities have reason to believe that such expression will substantially interfere with the work of the school or impinge upon the rights of other students".

The test of Katz can be applied to Jane Doe's case, as the Fourth Amendment protects people's reasonable expectations of privacy.

The Articles of Confederation failed to unify the nation because in this document, the empowerment of the government of the United States was utterly limited.

The economy and finance from the very beginning were anticipating that this law will bring the largest income to the state's budget and create plenty of job opportunities under the rule of law.

The issue in this case is to determine whether the items that were fixed in the house are part of the house or not.

These concessions consisted of the phrase "expressly delegated", that appeared in the Articles of Confederation, to be written into the Constitution to limit the powers of the new Congress.

Given the high numerical strength of the target population and the controversy about the Proposition 227 represented by legal cases centered on the policy, there is a necessity for studying the Proposition 58, which was [...]

Power is, to put it as simple as possible, the ability to influence the behavior and actions of other people to get what one wants. Miyagi manages to influence Daniel to do what he wants [...]

Thurgood Marshall, serving on the Supreme Court of the United States, was one of the prominent American jurists who played a pivotal role in shaping the history of civil rights in America.

All this would have to be translated by the family member to the boy so that he can understand his rights properly.

As a solution to any misinterpretation of the law, basically because of the probable fact that times have changed and that the original meaning may not make sense, there is usually room for amendments that [...]

It is the intention of this bill to restore this forgotten basic human right for the American citizens and enforce it.

Without the requirement of Miranda, police would be required to have large volume of litigation in criminal trial. Even when a crime suspects has been taken into custody without being informed of his rights, Miranda [...]

The battle over adoption of national prohibition and the implementation of the law disrupted organized labor, Prior to 1919 the scientific and medical community, the American Medical Association in particular, contributed influential arguments in support [...]

The metaphysical essence of notions of justice, freedom and intellectual excellence in this country, directly derives out of European mentality and out of European sense of religiosity; therefore, these notions can hardly be thought of [...]

The following is a text from the amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, will not be violated, and no warrants [...]

In order to include all the necessary points into the new constitution it is advisable that the already existing constitutions of the developed countries are consulted and the works of the reputable scholars in the [...]

If we are speaking about E-commerce, one of the most stressful issues is the problem of privacy and confidentiality, because many people who prefer to operate in Web environment, try to make sure that their [...]

Before attempt to evaluate the current operation of the law of public interest immunity in civil trials it is necessary to discuss the definition of public interest immunity, current situation and the judgement of few [...]

This will entail a balance between the right to privacy and the right to information from the point of view of security.

In the House of Representatives, the Bill is not reads, but entered in the Congressional record then sent to the relevant committee.

The City of New England has been in economic despair for a long time the unemployment rate of the city in 1998 was double the unemployment rate of the state.

S Constitution on the drug prevention in the nation and it tries to judge whether legalization, decriminalizing drug use and drug treatment could offer a better solution to the issue of drug use and drug [...]

The United States Fifth Amendment act protects the citizens of the United States as it states that no citizen of the country will be forced to answer for a capital offense without the outcome of [...]

However the recent events at the Gutanamo Bay and other American prisons where the imprisoned soldiers of the prisoners of war are held have raised the question regarding the applicability of the Geneva Convention to [...]

The issue whether the concept of incarceration in the American criminal justice system should remain punitive in nature or not is debatable. In the modern criminal justice system, one of the main goals of the [...]

The Necessary and proper clause entitled the Congress to adopt the necessary and proper laws, which will be observed by state governments, local authorities and other bodies of power, i.e.the clause allegedly enables the Congress [...]

At the end of the 19th century, there was very little opportunity at the Constitutional Convention for Madison to support a bill of rights of the conventional sort.

The executive power has far outstripped the Legislative and the Judicial branches in the development of the constitutional system, for the governor, has not confined himself to the position which the framers of the Constitution [...]

By focusing on the on goings in Guatemala, the NYT may have, no doubt earned the ire of the Bush administration, but it is also necessary that the American people are made aware of the [...]

The same document ensures that the majority is not able to infringe on the rights of the minority. The majority rule is the basic principle of U.S.democratic government, which rests on the assumption that policies [...]

From the rational point of view, it can be said that the power of judicial review is the inherent power of the court by means of which it can justify the validity of the laws [...]

The use of automated cars by Uber led to several accidents that resulted in the death of one of the pedestrians in Arizona.

The given article utilizes the empirical and quantitative methods of studying the relationship between the Supreme Court and the High Court Justice.

The court determined that people of Latin American descent were being discriminated against in the use of recreational parks and swimming pools in the city of San Bernardino.

In the course of the investigation, the Supreme Court stated that as the peyote usage was prohibited by law on the whole state territory, there was no actual violation of the man's exercise of religious [...]

The case of Hernandez v. Although the case of Hernandez v.

The first amendment of the Constitution states, "Congress will make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the [...]

Therefore, based on the theoretical application of the Constitution, the chosen case violates the Religious Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S.

In a bid to nurture the freedom of speech, the United States provides safety to the ethical considerations of free conversations.

The petitioner initiated the litigation process to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court to decide if the respondent had acted within the constitution by having applied the race factor in admitting to the institution.

Such a system can refresh the views on legal issues and establish less stereotypic judgments, which is especially important at the age of democracy in the United States.

In particular, it is about the right of the accused to a speedy jury trial of the state and district where the crime was committed, publicity of the trial, and providence the accused with the [...]