Law Practice Management Essay Examples and Topics

What are the literal and the technical meaning of maslahah mursalah? The three broad categories of maslahah include Al-Maslahah al-Mutabarah, Maslahah Mursalah, and the Maslahah Mulgha.

A judge reviews all of the testimonies and any further evidence that the defense lawyers bring forward, evaluates the defendants' views and trustworthiness, and then renders a decision based on their understanding of the constitution [...]

The needs range from physiological as one of the first needs to be fulfilled up the ladder to Maslow's peak of self-actualization.

It is not necessary for a victim advocate to state a client cultural identity. The use of polite form of languages and idioms may also create misunderstandings.

In the case of Jeannette M, the conclusion is that the receptionists at the patient's physician's office is responsible for the fact that medical care had not been provided to Jeannette on time, which inadvertently [...]

When a court uses a professional juror in providing decisions to cases in the court, less time is likely to be spent in coming up with the decisions. Hiring a professional juror is likely to [...]

As a result, the individual is in a position of authority and can impact others through advocacy in relation to a topic that is relevant.

A legal concurring opinion which is written by judges shows the support given by court's majority though in a manner that is quite different.

The paper starts with the details of the case, including the factual and procedural background thereof, proceeds to the judgment summary of the case and the analysis of the questions that the court ruling have [...]

The leader should also ensure the subordinates monitor the behaviors of the targeted prisoners. The main focus will be to examine the potential causes of the issues affecting the prison.

Without the intention of holding themselves as a trustee, the individual who offers the gifts to the beneficiaries of the will, proclaims that the choice is not shared among any trustees and will not be [...]

You have to make sure that you do not take sides during the hearing of the case. Pete Bartel argues out that he should have been given a warning according to the company's policy before [...]

Thus, the basis of the air rights in New York City is the zoning and the assignment of a specific high for buildings based on the area where the construction takes place.

The former decides to sue Johnny for breach of contract on the two commitments, buying the car and the $10,000 offer.

The codification of the operative principles and the establishment of a comprehensive statutory framework may be a viable means of eliminating these complexities and uncertainty, and to harmonize the law on easements.

More importantly, we will present six key witnesses who will place the accused in the vicinity of the crime at various timelines during that night of the crime up to the time that the accused [...]

This court is independent; this gives it the mandate to check the other two arms of the government that is the Legislature and the Executive.

The core of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the widespread use of surveillance cameras and the potential reduction in the frequency of violent acts by law enforcement.

According to researchers, communities of color are disproportionally represented in the category of people sentenced for drug offenses, which is one of the outcomes of the crack epidemic.

Thus, from the perspective of the natural sciences, height and weight ratio, as well as vision and hearing qualifications, flexibility, and other health conditions, are of high importance for the effective performance of police workers.

It can provide helpful knowledge for understanding the legal system of the state and how this aspect affects the development of the country and society.

The use of email was reasonably calculated because Facebook provided the court with confirmation of electronic address validity and proved the previous attempts to contact foreigners in person.

In particular, the aim of the researchers was to explore the resources that would be needed to ensure that the recidivism rates of the study's respondents were reduced and to find out if they would [...]

Instead, the police discovered a fallen piece of decoration that was a clear indication of what had really caused the death of the young man.

The primary issue identified by the case study is the extent to which free speech can be used and is protected regarding sensitive social aspects and discussions.

The growing urge to change the justice realm within the international judicial phase has been the force behind the transformation of the world in the current days.

A good case brief should show clear case facts that include the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant as well as the incident that led to the case. A brief of a case should [...]

The factor is that the regulation of domestic arbitration has a distinguished enforcement mechanism, while international arbitration can be seen lacking where the implementation of the awards can be more than difficult in "cases where [...]

The federal and local government stakeholders are interested in the safety of the Miami-Dade residents during the convention. Therefore, the stakeholders' interest that is the most important to MDPD is the enforcement of law and [...]

Making sure that offenders adhere to the conditions of their monitoring, which might involve travel limitations and attending therapy, is one of the main legal duties of parole and supervision agents.

The vital role of the Supreme Court in the lawmaking process is explained by its high status, the ability to make hearings public, and the functions entrusted to it.

As a result of the worry that a member of the public in need would not contact 911 for help, knowing that the expense of the aid would be their responsibility, County Fire Rescue has [...]

The defendant must prove the presence of paranoid schizophrenia and also that she was affected by his actions in such a way that he did not know what he was doing.

If elected to the US House of Representatives, the best approach to improving the lives of Florida citizens would be to uphold people's engagement.

Thesis: Despite the claimed benefits of police wearing body cameras, such as increased transparency and accountability, the drawbacks of invasion of privacy, breach of trust, and cost implications make the use of body cameras a [...]

The set of values and standards in police culture shapes the perceptions of law enforcement officers about policing and the delivery of services. Therefore, police culture is similar to other customs and habits that guides [...]

A designated task force is created from the pool of officers to routinely monitor repeat offenders and supervise young individuals who are more likely to engage in carjacking again.

In Antonin Scalia and Gutmann, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, chapter 1, "Intent of the Legislature," Scalia argues that the primary goal of legal interpretation should be to determine the intent [...]

The Supreme Court's judgment in Lorraine Gallagher v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 3 is a significant case that reaffirms the importance of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 [...]

In these aspects, he says, a diversity policy should be implemented to ensure that the force remains vigilant and professional when working with minority communities.

The trust between the public and the police is the essential element of the police forces' success in protecting the citizens and communities.

83, it is essential to say that far from the fact that criminals deserve to serve their sentences in prisons after the trial plays a role and the degree of punishment.

In this case, the outcome of the police engaging juveniles may be fatal, thus questioning the circumstances to which led to the fatality.

In his opinion piece for KCRA, Alanna Durkin observes that a checklist of stringent conditions governs the procedure of getting a search warrant. Durkin notes that the court could have only authorized the request if [...]

For example, in order to understand the nature of the crime and the offender's motivations, criminologists and psychologists refer to the police report. The documentation is needed to establish the truth about the case and [...]

The local media often help law enforcement officers in their work, and it is indeed a significant part of community-oriented policing.

The journal is titled "The role of virtual reality in criminal justice pedagogy: An examination of mental illness occurring in corrections".

Below the RCTs are cohort studies whereby among the selected group of interest, a part of it has some level of exposure to the object of study and observations of each group are made.

Therefore, the company's vehicles that featured the defeat device in the engine were prohibited per Article 5 of Regulation No 715/2007.

After the bill is read for the first time, it is sent to the Office of State Publishing to be printed and is then transmitted to a committee to be reviewed.

To understand the issue, one would need to look at the history of the American punishment system, how it changed throughout the turbulence of the post-war age, and came to the today's state of existence.

The signal about the shot is sent to the incident review center. The Detroit Police Department approved the use of this system and awarded a four-year contract to ShotSpotter.

However, the author provides an insight into the matter by claiming that the policy concerning workplace discrimination took a dramatic turn in the early 1960s upon adoption of the Title VII of the Civil Rights [...]

The paper aims to answer the key research questions: Why should the court system advocate for the affirmative action of the reversed discrimination? and what have been the respective roles of affirmative action and federal [...]

The situation should be evaluated first to understand the main vectors of the attack. Then, the environment should be analyzed to collect all possible evidence from the work office of the Sifers-Grayson company.

Those supporting the action of defunding want to see true reforms in the police force and cut down the 'rotten trees' that have been tarnishing the reputation of the institutions.

Nevertheless, the court protected the school and claimed the reasonability and fairness of its actions regarding the suspension of the students.

The beefing between the two hip-hop artists, Iggy Azalea and Azealia Banks, indicates a misapprehension existing on hip-hop's history. Due to the competitive nature of the market, artists try to survive by beefing with their [...]

The majority of countries have age restrictions for judges due to the nature of their profession. In conclusion, age restrictions are necessary for future judges because of the nature of their profession requiring experience, objectivity, [...]

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The issue presented to the court was the legality of search under the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution.

The defense counsel and the prosecutor have several similarities in terms of the roles they play. The defense attorney protects the defendant against charges of crime while the prosecutor protects the public against the wrongdoers.

The decision by the arbitrator to deny the Union its prayers can be described as unfair and reached without consideration of factors that could go either way.

Evan Miller lived in a trailer with his alcohol and drug-addicted mother and stepfather, who were abusing the boy. In 2012, the Court in the case of Miller v.

In order to predict the likelihood of this trend taking place in the future, it is essential to analyze the history of PIC in terms of profit.

Thus, I consider these documents to be of high importance, and the jurisdiction should give it more attention the punishments will only become more realistic.

The alternative dispute resolution is a term that is being used to capture a wide range of dispute resolution systems that are alternative to, or short of the normal court processes, or simply minitrials. In [...]

In court, defenders can find evidence through discovery, speak with witnesses of the crime, and file pretrial motions.

Legal risks may result from unfamiliar bodies of law, international nature of the industry, jurisdictional difficulties, venue, statute of limitations, and notice of claim.

Several court cases based on the 'compensation culture' phenomenon in the UK and how the UK courts have adapted to the 'compensation culture' have been employed in the analysis.

However, the Lord Chancellor retains the power of disciplinary and the appointment of judges as per the recommendations of the Judicial Appointment Commission.

The company has a total of seven attorneys specializing in different fields of law. The company does the hiring of various employees as and when the opportunity arises.

This paper will compare the constitutional framework of the U.S.and the UK, The cases in which the existing regulations collide with the essential Constitutional premises are quite few, yet they set the prime example of [...]

This fact ensures that the confirmation process is impartial, which contributes to the effectiveness of the Supreme Court by endorsing the candidates who have the most suitable skills and knowledge to occupy this position.

It is justifiable that sport's law will become considerably active in sports in order to govern and regulate the crimes and injustices that occur in sports and other related activities. It is crucial to consider [...]

These changes include increased demand for legal services from the ever-expanding corporate world and individuals who were previously underrepresented, an increase in the number of female lawyers, and an increase in the number of minorities [...]

In case the plaintiff provides enough evidence to support his or her case, in most instances, the court demands that the defendant pays the plaintiff a given amount of money as a form of compensation [...]

Considering the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, it is possible to state the information about the adoption history of the documents the criminal justice professionals should know.

In the discussion of gender, diversity and the law, it is important to understand workforce diversity as well as diversity in the judiciary section.

Some court cases may require the services of an expert to enable the jurors and judges to have a better understanding of the underlying principles of the case in question.

Wendling had told Puls that he might be having some cattle for sale and in response, Puls told him to communicate whenever he was ready to sell the animals. Therefore, the down-payment was to be [...]

However, after he presented evidence on the methodologies he applied in coming up with the conclusions on the origin and cause of the fire, the court granted the insured party a motion to strike the [...]

The Australian justice structure is centered on an elementary belief in the canon of law, justice and the autonomy of the judges.

As a matter of fact, there was no evidence to prove that the inclusion of the implied term in the contract was a professional custom in the insurance sector.

This way, the staff will be able to understand the values of the organization and the consequences of not conforming to the values.

For example, if a person has a bank account in a particular state, then he or she is under the jurisdiction of this state's court.

However, an increasing problem in the law courts is the aspect of false testimonies or false confessions that the witnesses, the claimants, and the defendants often present.

Although the article does not state the specific research question or hypothesis for the study, it is clear that the study wanted to address the question "what is the impact of drug courts on recidivism [...]

The booking process involves procedures such as recording the name of the suspect and the reasons for the arrest. The officers then scan the fingerprints of the suspect and the information is noted down in [...]

The concept simply means that the rule of law is the supreme authority in the land. The rule referred to in this case defines the behaviour of individuals in a given society.

The inclusion of the words "interstate commerce" changes the jurisdiction of this crime completely from the state courts jurisdiction to the federal courts jurisdiction.

Mayfield was suspected to have participated in the attack because the FBI lab had matched his finger prints to those found on a bag that contained the explosives in the Madrid attack.

The correctional services offered by the Criminal Justice System of a country are of great importance in the effective running of the society.

For example, in the case of bribery, the crime is fuelled both by the person who asks for the bribe and the one who pays it out.

Since guilty pleas have to be subject to the understanding of the criminal, investigations must show that the alleged person did not know about the crime at the time of performing it.

Therefore, just like the politicians and the government which is accountable to the citizens of the country, the judicial system is accountable to the citizens.

This paper discusses the changes in the civil procedure and the specific difficulties that existed prior to the changes. This was due to poor goals in the initial stages of the case.

It is quite different with the barrister, who presents the case in the court and helps his clients, the people accused, to escape the unjust and unfair punishment that has been imposed on them by [...]

The European regime has not clearly defined the extent of the market in terms of pricing and the passing of business information.

In the court case, the Counsel for the Government of Yunkel has requested that Judge Rosemelle Hasty, one of the three Pre-Trial Chamber members assigned to the matter, be disqualified.

Flexibility of the law is a complex legal debate, but a large majority of scholars and potentially the Founding Fathers, believed that the law can and should adapt, thus the purpose of Constitutional amendments and [...]

In my opinion, the problem of certain misuses is not in the modern technologies, but in legal workers, who should be strictly prohibited of tweeting and posting about their jobs.

This is new information that provides us with the insight in the context not only of the text but as well as the alternative and the natural law perspective that the constitution should be based [...]

1 Contextualism, on the other hand, is the approach that places the highest value on the interpretation of a text for the purpose of finding its objective meaning viewing it in the circumstances in which [...]

When the other parties receive the coded message, they go through the process of decoding or interpreting it to understand and meaning"."Effective ways of communicating exists between the sender of the information and the receiver [...]

The central aspects to be covered are considered to be the following: ethics, integrity, training, teamwork, trust, recognition, leadership, and communication; the analysis discloses the depth of management structure and environment developed within Abu Dhabi [...]

The Moe company was to construct the premises and then lease it to Burns Company, where the construction of the premises was to be done by King Kong company.

Though this might result in delays and customer may not be able to thoroughly review such information Another disadvantage of arbitration is that the decision of the arbitrator is final and in general one cannot [...]

The law in this case is that, under Texas law, a person could be held guilty for only same sex sodomy, while under these laws, hetero-sexuals engaging in sodomy would not fall within the purview [...]

In the Hoover dam case, safety measures were not taken to ensure the safety of the people working at the site.Sec.

In some countries like England, the legal profession is split between the Solicitor whose work is to represent and advise the clients and a Barrister who is retained by a solicitor to give a legal [...]

All of the cases of the Court are submitted to the Registrar and when the Registrar receives the case, it is dated based on the date of receipt by the Registrar.

Judicial independence is the principle that the verdict of the judiciary should be fair, impartial, and honest and not subject to manipulation from other arms of the government or political or private interest.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a quick, fair, and public trial by an impartial jury and the ability to face the accusation and provide witnesses.

From the article, it is clear that the government advanced an argument that police officers need to be given the power to search cellphones because of the long-established exception to the Fourth Amendment, which makes [...]

The advantages of the unified model are in the fact that they are operationally efficient because of the centralized regulation, effective use of resources, and the efficient approach to organizing the court operations.

Whenever, the members of the public vote against the retention of the judge, the governor is required to appoint another judge to fill the position.

For instance, racial profiling often results in misjudging the level of danger of encounter based on the race of the perpetrator.

The key aim of such training consists in the increased diversity awareness; the expected outcome is the lack of discrimination, harassment, and the promotion of a positive, inclusive environment at the workplace.

An employer is expected to comply with privacy requirements, but it is notable that in certain cases, the line between private life and duty is blurred, which may change the attitude of the law to [...]

This article is available in the ProQuest database which contains thousands of articles related to criminal justice. The members of this organization can purchase a wide variety of publications on different areas of criminal law.