Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 24

Since 1963, it has been the decision of the Supreme Court that all the pieces of evidence should be presented to the courts, even if it is in favor of the defendants.

The country also needs to train more prosecutors and legal experts so that justice is disseminated to suspected terrorists who continue to be held at Guantanamo Bay without trial.

In response to the charges, the association maintained that the charges lack merit. To enhance competition and productivity, the firm should avoid entering into agreements that compromise competition in the market.

This stance is somewhat solidified by the absence of a requirement in Title VII for seniority systems to let up and accommodate employees for religious observance.

The issue that concerns patents in biotechnology is the inventions in the industry and inventions in the academic field. Of greater focus in the paper is bringing out the complex issues that appertain to patenting [...]

The executive officer was inked with the deliberate alterations of the company's profits and the omission of debts and losses in the financial reports.

This is further worsened by the fact that the number of offenders to be monitored after being released is often higher than the number of officers tasked with the responsibility of following up on them.

It is imperative to note that some of these theories are swallowed up in the initial five, and so for the purposes of this paper, only the fundamental aspects of these theories will be discussed.

The violation of intellectual property rights through counterfeiting and piracy is an issue that has mostly affected the conduct of trade and the benefits that accrue from such trade in countries worldwide, locally and internationally.

The corporate finance defines the life and death of a corporation. Implementation of the corporate law has created a favorable environment for businesses to thrive.

The growing urge to change the justice realm within the international judicial phase has been the force behind the transformation of the world in the current days.

This paper discusses the extent to which rules of standing and the grounds of judicial review have struck the right balance between helping claimants achieve justice and protecting the executive and public bodies from excessive [...]

It explores the history of Saudi Arabia IPO laws, the problems facing non-stock corporations, advantages of IPOs, types of IPOs, and the effects of the transactions in the Saudi Arabian market.

Self-control theory is a criminology theory that analyzes the lack of self-control and its influence on crime rates. This article considers the influence of the self-control theory when dealing with juvenile sex offenders.

When examining the case of Darfur, it can be noted that three specific factors prevented "true justice" from being administered, these encompass: the abstained votes from the U.S.and China in voting for a resolution for [...]

These include the presence of anger in the general strain theory and the depression that an individual experiences when he is a victim.

According to the Supreme Court of California's calendar, several cases were to be heard during the day and the day after.

The court was established in the year 1879. The court was told that after the murder, Nuckles escaped to Mexico.

Emiratisation is an initiative supported by the government of the United Arab Emirates to tackle the imbalance in the employment of the local population about that of expatriates.

This study will focus on assessing the reliability of the rules governing the movement of goods and intellectual property and the significant impact of the rules in safeguarding the interests of key stakeholders.

For example, during the probation period, the offender is ordered to abide by the orders given by the probation officer. The major target of probation is to change the behavior of the offender.

This will be helpful to them because the civilians have different styles of learning and implementing the rule of law. Understanding the crime learning theories is very important and their impacts determine the destiny of [...]

Leadership rests in the top management of the prisons who are the decision-makers and lead the prison to attain its objectives.

The persistence of poverty, regardless of the many shocks that every state receives in the normal course of its survival, raises the feeling that underdevelopment is a condition of equilibrium and that there are pressures [...]

Social disorganization theory refers to a theory in criminology that attributes crime and delinquency variation over a period to the absence or total breakdown of institutions owned by the community such as families, churches or [...]

The concept of deterrence is the foundation of criminal justice systems in a majority of democratic nations. In my opinion, law enforcement is the second area where the implications of deterrence have more impacts.

The health of citizens is the main aim of any country because it ensures that the workforce is in good shape to contribute to the economy of the country.

The girl woke up to find the boy raping her. In this case, the boy might have had an insecure childhood and, therefore, engaged in the act for self-interest.

The study followed a good research study in order to achieve the targeted goals. The researchers also used the best research method in order to have a successful study.

This paper offers advice to the family of the patient in the case. The paper achieves this by examining the case of Ann's family and her wishes regarding her health.

Although the article does not state the specific research question or hypothesis for the study, it is clear that the study wanted to address the question "what is the impact of drug courts on recidivism [...]

According to the author, the problem-solving courts richly supplement the function of the formal justice system in the United States. Second, the author assumes the role of an observer in order to report both the [...]

It is possible to conclude that white collar offenders are usually well off and have certain status in the society. On balance, it is necessary to note that demographic and psychological characteristics of white collar [...]

The generalisation about the people who commit crime indicates flaws in the processes of thinking and possible outcomes. It appears that the society chooses to pay attention to crime committed by specific groups, such as [...]

In the lawsuit, they stated that the schools were engaged in a practice that violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

The booking process involves procedures such as recording the name of the suspect and the reasons for the arrest. The officers then scan the fingerprints of the suspect and the information is noted down in [...]

This relationship highlights the structure of inequality in America and the role of the "system" in contributing to the social and economic challenges of the urban poor.

However, the common practice in Canada is that many ministers and other public servants have been assigned a rights-determining function that meets the specification of a judicial function. In this respect, Ellis notes that such [...]

This documentary also examines the inappropriateness of the decision to execute Aileen Wuornos. Some of these theories can support the events and facts of Aileen Wuornos as portrayed in the film.

It is obvious that what has occurred can be defined as the breach of the patient's confidentiality and the violation of the patient's civil rights.

Even though the case generated a lot of controversies, Timothy McVeigh was convicted and sentenced to death by the District Court in Colorado for the crime.

In the movie, the main cause of criminal activities is corruption and drug trafficking. The other cause of crime in the area is the widespread trafficking and use of drugs in the area.

Witness cajoling and falsification of evidence were common in the cases that Scarcella had dealt with. The group pinpointed several inconsistencies in Chmil's cases that could have resulted in the conviction of innocent individuals.

The determination will depend on the strengths and weaknesses of the case as presented to the prosecutor by the detectives. Being that Sally and John were in a relationship at the time of her death, [...]

The main purpose of seeking compensation of damages resulting from a breach is to put the innocent party in its initial position if the breach had not occurred in the first place. Huang had clearly [...]

These laws consider the rights of parents towards children, and the rights of children towards parents, as stated in the parents and child ordinance.

The main protection provided by the fourth amendment is based upon the concept of protection and the right to privacy. The first issue that is provided for under the Fifth Amendment is the use of [...]

Employment laws have been used for a long time to safeguard the interests of employees and employers at the workplace. Second, the effect of the existing employment laws on the local and overseas executives has [...]

The fact that John's DNA results match the crime blood DNA results does not prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is responsible for Sally's murder.

Penney alleges that the company was aware of Samuels' disability and the fact that Samuels was a valued employee of the company.

Many feminists create movements against honor killings, trying to protect the rights of women in the Middle East; Western people do not understand the tradition of honor killing in Islam and judge every case of [...]

The outlined research question points to the purpose of the study. The researchers compare the recidivism patterns of offenders who undergo sex offender treatment with the same patterns for offenders who do not undergo the [...]

The elements of a contract with regard to real estate are analyzed in this essay. Recently, I entered into a contract with the seller of a strategically located house in Nevada.

Combined with eyewitness testimony and video evidence, it can be stated beyond all doubt that Clark was guilty of the crime.

In the last one decade, the relative success of drug courts has led to the establishment of a growing number of driving while impaired or driving under the influence courts across the U.S.

According to Schneider community policing is a value system that permeates the department of police with the main aim of collaborating with the general public to identify and resolve issues that are negatively impacting the [...]

It will also discuss the differences between the benefits that the nationals of the UAE are entitled to and those that their foreign counterparts receive. Generally, the benefits are provided to improve employees' standard of [...]

Hallucinogenic drugs impede the user's brain functioning as well as the central nervous system and interfere with the user's experience of reality. The effects of psychedelic drugs often vary according to the specific drug used [...]

The committee consults the employees in a certain health care facility to get information on emerging problems in relation to violence, and on feedback with regard to the prevailing workplace violence program in place.

Neighborhood networks in Memphis focus on the provision of resources and high-quality programs to the youths and families who are exposed to crime.

The Criminal Justice system in the United States consists of three major parts namely the police, the corrections, and the courts, all of which tend to have their historical roots and influences from English Law [...]

In August 1919, the Boston police strike started when the police service attempted to seek unionization in the American Federation of Labor. Administratively, the structure of the police force also contributed to the grievances of [...]

An important principle noticed in the provided will is the mentioning of trustees and executors of the will, who are the people entrusted with the execution of the will.

In particular, it is necessary to explain the importance of this activity for the protection of investors and customers. On the whole, whistleblowing is particularly important for the protection of investors who place their trust [...]

While judges on a case-by-case basis make laws under the Common Law tradition, the legislative body is responsible for enacting laws under the Statutory Law tradition. Under the Common Law tradition, it is the responsibility [...]

The will documents that Peter Cross as the testator, willfully writes to provide legal credence of property ownership to his two estate trustees is the primary source of data to analyze ethical and legal implications [...]

Gains due the cancellation or sale of a life insurance policy before the death of the insured are subject to taxation because the tax exemption on proceeds from life insurance applies upon the death of [...]

At the center of this analysis is the role of socialization in explaining crime and the legal definitions of crime as a misdemeanor and a felony.

Instead, the police discovered a fallen piece of decoration that was a clear indication of what had really caused the death of the young man.

The concept simply means that the rule of law is the supreme authority in the land. The rule referred to in this case defines the behaviour of individuals in a given society.

Prior to the case, the general position "was that non-payment of hire allowed the owners to withdraw the vessel and to claim for unpaid hire only, but the owners had to show a repudiatory breach [...]

Moreover, the employees who obtain an employment contract are on the safe side, as their employers have no right to dismiss them until the end of the contract. The employment at will doctrine describes a [...]

This paper draws the theories discussed herein from a radical orientation; they include radical, feminist and critical criminology theories and present principles that alter the existing and traditional views on the development of criminal behaviour [...]

The nature of behavior problems particularly the absence or presence of physical aggression is central to a concrete understanding of the origins and effects of conduct problems.

This is one of the strategies that can often be adopted by designers to defend their rights in court. This is one of the points that can be made.

The use of a personal name as a trademark is one of the most disputable issues now. However, it is not that easy to make a personal name a trademark in the world of fashion.

In this paper, advice is provided to Fiona, a consumer, from the perspective of consumer law in the United Kingdom. The hire purchase agreement between Fiona and the company amounts to a regulated contract that [...]

The main task of the law enforcing officers, in this case, is to investigate to establish the truth in form of evidence attached to the suspects.

One common thing, however, is that in all the countries of the world, the body that concerns itself with the responsibility of enforcing the governing laws is the police.

Further, the Association provided the data for the frequency of fraud under the various sub-categories of the asset misappropriation for the year 2012.

One common thing, however, is that in all the countries of the world, going against any of the stipulated constitutional laws usually results in penalties for those who violate these laws and the body that [...]

According to Merino, the effects of the implementation of change or change initiating in the criminal justice system extend far beyond the desired change.

Ulane, as a transsexual, brought a lawsuit against Easter Airlines for dismissing her from her role as a pilot. The Court maintained that the company discriminated against Ulane based on her sex as a transsexual [...]

Most critiques express doubt as to the relevance of application of the Act in the modern system, given that a number of clauses seem to be a problem1.

There have been suggestions to study the inquisitorial system and adopt some of its features that could help to improve the determination of truth under the US adversarial system. It is thus advisable to redesign [...]

Therefore, the legitimacy of the comparison of police to warriors depends on the concept that the person making the comparison has of a warrior.

As a result, both the insurance company that issued the life insurance policy on Peter's life to fund the shareholder's agreement and the insurance company that insured the building cannot be held liable.

The evidence extracted in the course of the search, which did not comply with the existing law and violated the principles of the Fourth Amendment, was considered inadmissible for the use in the court proceedings.

But there is also the matter of usage of already existing material and the contracts that are drawn up by companies to make a profit.

The author of this paper identifies the problem to be a lack of proper training and the use of outdated modes of instruction.

One of the most affected areas where abuse of intellectual property is common is in the field of graphic design. It means that there is need to develop laws that would govern intellectual property in [...]

The Superior Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment rights of the defendant were violated; a decision that was upheld by the Court of Appeal.

The article studies the degree at which feelings, family units, and surrounding correlates are linked with the increase of non-aggressive to aggressive offending among the imprisoned teenagers.

The acts and omissions lead to indivisible harm as medical professionals jointly contribute to the occurrence of harm or injuries among patients.

In this regard, companies are able to compare their financial management practices to those from other parts of the world. The economic implication of switching to IFRS is that the conversion is costly in terms [...]

A good case brief should show clear case facts that include the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant as well as the incident that led to the case. A brief of a case should [...]

To address my fraud scheme, it will be important to initiate investigations with regard to all the aspects of its planning and execution.

On the other hand, in the Welch case, Jenifer's former husband did not disclose the portion of the property he held in a partnership while they were married.

The first requirement that should be met in the initialization of the process that sets the stage for the amendment of the constitution is prior notice.

Police obtained a blood fingerprint from the defendant's room and were able to match the fingerprint to the defendant and the blood to the victim.

What the prosecutors and even the judge in this particular case failed to take note of is the potential for this particular type of resentment to escalate well into the future possibly leading to a [...]

Tonry's goals of explaining the main underlying processes of American penal policymaking and the adverse effects of irrational decisions driven by the moral panic and the politicians' inclination of gaining authority among the potential voters [...]

This Court commenced work in the year 1946 as a replacement to the then Permanent Court of International justice although it can be argued based on facts that the International Court of Justice was the [...]

Under this provision, Sandpiper footwear is an exception because the flip-flops worn at the time of the accident were not defective at the time of the accident.

In this case, the actus reus that must be met for a case to qualify as an assault case is for the victim to apprehend, instance of personal violence, unlawfulness and immediacy.

Criminal profiling refers to the technique of observing and analyzing the behavioral patterns of a crime so as to assist the investigators come up with a descriptive template of the offender.

Doctors point to the following main issues which might be used for banning boxing, "the frequency and causes of fatalities", "the incidence of brain injury", and "a comparison between the incidence of death and brain [...]

The module started by introducing intellectual property and relating its significance to companies in terms of ownership of their creations as well as the benefits that come from such creations.

Intellectual property, which is also known as IP, refers to a number of unique creations that the owners get exclusive rights over, so that no other individual or organization is allowed to reproduce them or [...]

The inclusion of the words "interstate commerce" changes the jurisdiction of this crime completely from the state courts jurisdiction to the federal courts jurisdiction.

Mayfield was suspected to have participated in the attack because the FBI lab had matched his finger prints to those found on a bag that contained the explosives in the Madrid attack.

One of the contributing factors to the disparity in the crime rates between the genders is the labor force participation. The tendency in women's crime rate has been higher in the minor offenses of shop-lifting [...]

In addition, it is necessary to edit the research question/hypothesis after reviewing the literature and determining variables; select the research method; sampling methods and control of variables should be thoroughly explained as well; description of [...]

The understanding of the occupants and their needs is thus important in deliberating on the features of the final design One of the most vibrant sections of society is the youth.

The accuracy of victimization surveys, therefore, depends on the honesty of the respondent or the ability of the respondent to have a good memory of the criminal instances.

It is the intensified public participation in the planning and assessment of the environment that mid-wifed the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act of the 1980s.

Vicarious liability is a term used to refer to situations where parents are punished because of the offenses committed by their children.

She further argued that she acted in her capacity as a custodian of the school to protect other students to whom she had been entrusted from the illegal use of drugs advocated by the banner.

He was born in a family of four and his father was named George Gein who was a tanner and a carpenter but a drunkard.

An exception of such a requirement is in the case of a strict liability in which the proof of the actual performance of an act is not required for guiltiness to stand.