Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 20

On the part of the FMGL as a company, the court utilized sections 1041H and 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 as well as section 52 of the Trade Practice Act 1974.

There exists the option of complying with the 45,000 minimum weight limits at the expense of the profits that the company obtains by the 60,000 minimum weights limits.

In the case of land, if Andy decides to revoke the contract for the sale, he must return the payment he had received for the land.

These are set of standard terms put in place to have a healthy business between the customers and the company. The company is committed to ensuring that it has safeguarded the data of customers by [...]

However, many people have applauded the functions of the commission with the thesis that the commission has helped in raising the standards of management in the corporate sector. The commission has also boosted the contribution [...]

The strategies that the police use to fight crime must be able to respond to the needs of law enforcement in the 21st century.

This is owed to the fact that Christie lacks the necessary documentation that she could present to the court to support her claim that she was rightly paying the $175.

Training and counseling of the youth on a career is important in preventing juvenile violence and delinquent behaviors related to gang activities.

Currently, the renowned form of corruption that degrades the efforts of man in the search and quest to discover novel things and innovatively new ideas is plagiarism.

Biological theories can be used in explaining female gang behavior, owing to certain physical and biological characteristics. Though the female gang behavior has its roots in biological and psychological factors to some extent, much emphasis [...]

From an information perspective, it is clear that new technologies, such as the use of iris recognition solutions, can assist in the effective and efficient management of correctional systems since these facilities are predominantly information-centric [...]

The council of the City of Prince George is charged with the mandate of providing a variety of services to residents and inhabitants of the area.

From the studies and cases observed during the course sessions regarding the sport's law, it is evident that the utilization of domestic disciplinary tribunals is increasing due to their significance in the sport's realms.

In this paper, I will elaborate on the facts of the case, the main issues, and the court's ruling and how it effected and affected the parties. The following were the facts of the forensic [...]

It needs to be clear that bribing and other forms of corruption by a foreign public official is a crime that needs to be addressed by the Attorney General in the right manner as it [...]

Many human rights activists have come forward to champion the rights of the minorities and in some instances agitate for democratic governance.

One of the key issues in the legal field is the distinction between the concepts of contracts and agreements. These two concepts are extremely interrelated in legal terms.

In civil and other legal literature, the categories of contract and agreement are considered to be synonymous. However, there are a number of differences between the two concepts.

Despite the confusion, many lawyers agree that in order to establish what is reasonable and what is not, the court should evaluate the case on the basis of the following criteria; First, the court should [...]

The jury considers the application of the law unjust to the defendant. In view of this, the nullification of the law is witnessed.

Over the last two decades, violent crime rates and youth crimes have steadily declined but improvements to return the juvenile justice system to its initial goal have been slower.

The society established ways of dealing with these groups of people through the implementation of the rule of law to ensure they account for all their actions.

According to the accounts in the case, the amiable relationship between Mr. Drapkin agreed to leave the company, which resulted to the contract in question.

Although many people do not recognize the difference between corporate liquidation and dissolution, the truth of the matter is that there is a fine line between the definitions of the two.

There are however a number of complications linked with the legislation in terms of how effective it has been in the actualization of the purpose for which it was instituted even though the DMCA has [...]

Trespass to chattels occurs when damage is caused to an item or the holder of that item. It entails the cause of injury to an individual or his/her property.

When two parties sign a contract, they are to fulfill their part of the bargain, if that is not possible, then we declare a breach of contract, in which case there are procedures to be [...]

As such, it can be argued that ADR processes are unable to correct systematic injustice, discrimination, or violations of rights among the parties involved.

The reform agenda that was started in the 1700s saw the creation of prisons as a departure from hanging of offenders, to cruel punishment, to manual labor, to rehabilitation and to current reforms that continue [...]

All gangs have a common characteristic in them which is evident in all the different definitions of gangs, a gang has to have at least a more than two or three members, all members of [...]

The major responsibilities of a judge include; maintaining the court's order while a case is in process, determining whether the evidence given by either side is inadmissible, instructing the jury before the beginning of deliberations [...]

Under the prevailing Australian federal income tax law, stipulated in the provisions of the income tax law, section 8A of the Income Tax Assessment Tax 1936 refutes deductions exceeding $250 of expenses incurred on self-education.

The morale of the business employees have been raised by the equal pay act 2009, thereby making the workers to be motivated in the delegation of duties.

In most cases, individuals with self destructive inclinations tend to isolate themselves from the rest of societal entities and are normally afraid and suspicious of other people.

That is why, in order to examine the level of human consciousness that leads to hate crimes and to find the answer on the question of why people commit them, it is crucial to seek [...]

Contracts with the Internet service providers can be valid or not with references to the aspect of legality and the parties' approaches to following the conditions of the contract.

With regard to our case, the company failed to send a notice of meeting to Vladimir and, thus, it deprived him of the right to second a motion.

This has been due to the lack of proper structures and information that can be used to curb criminal activities."A report that was presented to the congress by attorney general, Michael Mukasey, revealed the nature [...]

The film chronicles the details of proceedings of the trial of the young African-American. The boy gets arrested and is taken to the scene of crime for questioning by the detectives.

A is a statistical agency in the Department of Justice bestowed with the responsibility of compiling various kinds of statistics in the filed of Criminal Justice.

It is justifiable that sport's law will become considerably active in sports in order to govern and regulate the crimes and injustices that occur in sports and other related activities. It is crucial to consider [...]

However, this is to ensure that the number of crimes committed decrease, as the number of crime manager's increases. Boredom in many young people is by the lack of something constructive to do.

Closely connected to this is the issue where there are allegations of harassment and mistreatment of these minorities inside the prisons.

The initial conduct of the sales representative in regards to the terms of the contract is misleading and deceptive in nature.

If preferred stock is not participating, all proceeds in excess of the liquidation preference would go to the common share holders".

The investors introduce them to the firm's present owners and once the business consultants realize the potential profitability of the firm, they form a corporation with the intention of purchasing the shares of the firm.

The investor could also argue that the two business consultants knew all along what the intentions of the investor were, and that they failed to inform him of the actual value of the firm's shares [...]

It is evident that the consultants breached the terms and agreement of the business transactions hence they ought to recompense the investor.

Physical evidence may be proved by a witness establishing the identity of the person behind a recorded or original voice. Computer-generated evidence such as X-ray pictures could be used to illustrate the verbal testimony of [...]

It is apparent that the limitations to the exclusionary rule are on the rise and soon there may be limitation to admitting illegally obtained evidence in a trial.

In this situation, the plaintiff is the Louisiana pension and is asking an offshore court to order the liquidation of a fletcher asset management hedge fund.

The confession that was given by the defendant was relevant to this particular case since the defendant claimed that she knew the mentally ill youth was meant to die in the house once it was [...]

It is in the mandate of the main contractor to let a portion of the initially assigned task be performed by a sub-contractor.

However, if the Employer guarantees to indemnify the Contractor, then the former is allowed to appoint a sub-contractor. Concisely, when a Contractor employs a nominated Subcontractor, the Contractor assumes the responsibility of the actions of [...]

The parties to the contract have the right to enforce the contract in the event of infringement of its terms by any one of them.

Secondly, the standard of proof regarding such undue influence in obtaining a confession is to a balance of probabilities, so that if it 'appears' to the court that an accused person's confession was involuntary, the [...]

Thus, it is important to device a method of investigation that may enhance the preservation and maintenance of the integrity of the evidence.

This knowledge is paramount in forensic science as it helps investigators of crime to establish the type of weapon and ammunition used in a crime scene. With the firing of a bullet, the pressure reduces [...]

The law of negotiable instruments, the law of tort and the other relevant laws in the business world ensure that businessmen conduct transaction in an orderly manner. Another example of the law providing security to [...]

The ultimate aim of this context is to outline the facts of the case, which include the definitive and the plaintive, the legal action to be undertaken and the claim that can be made.

In this regard, the defendant in this case refers to the firm that was issued with a warrant to send a representation during the hearings and mentions of the said case.

The government is also expected to present convincing evidence of the defendant's presence at the scene of the crime on the said date.

In the United States, student loans come in various forms like federal higher education loans directly given to students, federal loans given to parents, and loans privately made to students which could be either to [...]

At other times, the police will tend to go against the law and do things, which are not acceptable, not only by the law of the country but also to the social ethics of citizens.

The final action that is taken is by DEA is to revoke the license until the owners of the hospital proved to be legible to have the license.

The criminal justice system is the institution or the criterion that is used to keep all people that are subject to the law in check.

A contract must be valid to be upheld in a court of law; the validity of a contract is determined on the basis of five elements that have been outlined above.

The purpose of the NMB is to take the initiative that will avoid any interruption of interstate commerce, enforce the limitations of the freedom of choice or association by the employees of an air or [...]

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster occurred primarily because the builders of the nuclear plant wanted low cost in the completion of the project.

Hence, the conservation and protection of the aquatic biodiversity, as expressed by the international legal policy instruments, is not only necessary for consideration in the international arena, but also amounts to treaties to which Saudi [...]

The paper comes from the premise that after all contraception is widely used in the US but not all the women can afford the contraceptive.

In 2006 for example, the percentage of the national income absorbed by tax in the UK averaged those of the developed countries.

The work of consumer policy is to facilitate functioning markets by empowering consumers to make informed choices, exercising their preferences, and informing the suppliers about the needs of the consumers.

Although environmental and social factors are believed to impact on the mental health of inmates, not much is known about the effect of prison environment on the mental health of inmates.

Prince case, the defendant argued that Cariou's work was in no way creative as it was rather an album of photography that did not qualify to be placed under the copyright law.

The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of juvenile rehabilitation centers and the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs among juvenile offenders.

In addition, the paper discusses the rules and regulations of maintenance procedures and safety as per the European Aviation Safety Agency manual.

Mulroy asserted that he was an employee of the Western and that Olberding was involved in the incident while on his specified duty in the company.

This may concern the content of a declaration made by the privileged individual outside the trial or the information he/she knows but is not willing to reveal.

The plaintiff sued the vehicle's driver, County and the driver's defendant on behalf of the decedent's estate and as a family member.

These changes include increased demand for legal services from the ever-expanding corporate world and individuals who were previously underrepresented, an increase in the number of female lawyers, and an increase in the number of minorities [...]

The federal government of the United States includes the executive, the judiciary, and the legislature. The judiciary interprets the laws passed by the legislature while the executive bears the power to execute, enforce, and administer [...]

The management of Genco Company should be keen on setting out the date of registration because it helps to determine the period, which the business will be legal to operate in the country.

Lofthouse's condition, together with the provision of incorrect medicine to the patient contributed to the deterioration of the patient's health."In this case, a delay in medical clerking and prescription of medication, inappropriate antibiotic selection and [...]

Even though this was not included in the contract, the fact that James was made to believe that he was purchasing the items that he had wanted by the salesperson gives validity to the feelings [...]

In a way, it can be defined as the way in which people view themselves and the society they live in and act accordingly based on the type of social identity that is identifiable to [...]

It is important to acknowledge the role authorities will play in implementation and success of any plan like the one outlined above. Authorities will also play an important role in providing legislative support to successful [...]

The Trademark Act of 1994 is one of the acts that protect the ownership rights of a trademark. The application for registration of a trademark for the Pointymints has different effects to the owner of [...]

The role of patrolling the city by the London Metropolitan Policy Act, which was enacted to run for full-time and to engage the uniformed police force, was a major inspiration for American policing.

To effectively bring out the correlates of police use of force and the varied reaction this is likely to amass from the general public, the writers of this article have borrowed from a number of [...]

The owner of the restaurant has the right to claim for compensation due to the breach of the contract by the tomato dealer.

The man can bring a civil action to the court to demand a remedy for the bodily injuries he suffered after Bertha pushed heavily into the street, he fell on the parking meter and injured [...]

In case the plaintiff provides enough evidence to support his or her case, in most instances, the court demands that the defendant pays the plaintiff a given amount of money as a form of compensation [...]

Considering the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, it is possible to state the information about the adoption history of the documents the criminal justice professionals should know.

They include a notification to the general public about the right of ownership of the trademark, exclusive rights to the use of the mark and a legal conjecture of ownership nationally.

The statutes include the company law, the law contract and other legal acts. However, the political atmosphere cannot allow the implementation of the law.

Insurance basics state that the insurer covers the insured and in the event of any circumstances unknown to the insured, the insurer is supposed to pay relief to the insured.

Law enforcement may be defined as the structure in which the community members act in a well thought-out behavior to endorse observance to the law by investigating and grueling persons who infringe the regulations and [...]

This particular scenario was seen in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis wherein despite the bailouts provided by the government there was still a certain degree of hesitance on the part of banks to [...]

Section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 defines a director of a company or other body as someone appointed to the position of a director or appointed to the position of an alternate director and [...]

In particular, the aim of the researchers was to explore the resources that would be needed to ensure that the recidivism rates of the study's respondents were reduced and to find out if they would [...]

Depending on the category each crime falls in as defined by the federal and criminal law, the severity and magnitude of punishment as determined by the courts varies.

The evolution of probation started in England and later spread to America as recognizance upon release and bail on condition that the suspect would avail him/herself before the court.

Besides enforcing the order, the mission of policing is to investigate activities suspected as criminal and refer the outcome to the court of law.

S, the evolution of the criminal justice system can be traced from the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice of 1967 with the famous "The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society" [...]

In this case, John failed to fulfill his share of the contact thus Chen has this as a basis of not paying the high labor cost, the case says "John builds the extension but does [...]

Since this agency is part of the Department of Labor, It is headed by the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.

The attribute of illiteracy and poor education to marital rape is also misdirected. In this case, people's thinking depends on these myths and therefore their behaviour is inclined to the cultural myths.

Public health is also comprehensive in the agencies that fall under the decision-making branch of the government that is the executive.

The ultimate aim of this context is to examine the principles of Information Privacy as outlined in the Privacy Act 1988 and the reasons as to why they need amendment.

The diverse array of citizens requires police to be constantly trained on how to handle the individuals in the society. Lastly, the unclear mandate of the police has been an impediment to the work done [...]

This is given the fact that the parties involved in the arbitration may encounter hurdles in the future that may compromise the fulfilment of some of the clauses in the arbitration agreement.

Apparent authority is the authority of an agent as it appears to others and has been found to coincide with the actual authority.

The practice of sealing juvenile's court records is indeed acceptable practice to some extent in most countries in the world. Recent surveys as analyzed in the article indicate that the locations where juvenile records are [...]

This model approaches crime by assuming that the best treatment for any crime is treating the causative factors associated with the crime. According to this model, the reason for the increased crime rate is due [...]

According to the proceedings of the case, it is obvious that Rick Chavis influenced the decision taken by the boys at the time.

The main themes of the article identified in the memo can be summarized into three distinct points: Legal issues Authenticity of information available Personal profile management and self-marketing The first theme derived from the article [...]

In the first paragraph, the author of the memo clearly indentifies the source of his information together with the author of the article.

Probation on the other hand is a legal punishment that is provided as part of a sentence where the convicted offender is expected to report to a probation officer regularly instead of being jailed as [...]

Therefore, the government had to decide which project was of the higher importance for them, either the Olympic Games which could increase the economic potential of the country, or the conservation of the natural resources [...]