Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 23

On a more general level, the court ruling addresses the issue of intercultural relations among the American population in general and the bias typically associated with the representatives of the African American culture in particular.

Windsor" is a landmark case that involved the Supreme Court and the institution of marriage in the United States, particularly the State of New York.

Regardless of the legal and business implication of this model, it is beneficial to both physicians and the ST Joseph business enterprise.

The fact that violence is extremely widespread in gang members' everyday life and the need to protect themselves from rivals result in the prevalence of firearms among gangsters. It should be noted that the internal [...]

In addition to the increased health care costs, such cases have pushed employers to the extreme to the extent of calling for measures to mitigate the spiraling health care costs.

The robbery was one of the crimes listed under English laws in the twelfth century during the reign of Henry II.

Due to this fact, it is possible to describe the existing problem as the increase in the number of crimes that children commit.

In case the victim of the crime is a minor, the parent or the guardian has the right to request the notification.

In case any of the parties contests a mutual agreement, the determination of the availability of a contract between PrintCo and Worldnews would be based on facts.

Certainly and more often money involved in laundering is obtained from illegal activities and the main objective of laundering is to 'clean' the dirty money and give it a legitimate appearance in terms of source.

Furthermore, this information can provided to the insurance company, if it is needed for a follow-up treatment that is not paid out of pocket.

As soon as the specifics of the staff's role in the organization and the threats that they are exposed to are taken into account, the implementation of the PPO strategy should help improve the quality [...]

Based on the discussion of the circumstances that led to the financial collapse of LP, the paper recommends the company to sue the directors for breach of the provisions of the Company Law with reference [...]

In particular, the judges decided that there was a contract because the appellant accepted the payment for the construction of the well.

In addition, the opponents of the amendment argued that the double jeopardy could be detrimental to the defendants, because the appellate court would have to reverse the conviction in the case of a no new [...]

On 9th of December, 2001, Peterson reported that his wife fell when he had gone out of the house to the pool in the middle of the night.

A key disadvantage is that professional autonomy impedes the structure of various ambulatory care systems. The three sources of law that relate to the new ambulatory center are constitutional, statutory, and administrative laws.

In the case of Jodi Arias, she is alleged to have had a childhood that was full of violent abuse from her parents since the age of seven.

The action by the court caused Bullard to appeal against the decision to the BAP to which the BAP concluded that the denial was not the final.

In societies whose democracies are based on people's rights, punishment for crimes committed by convicts is enhanced through the curtailing of some fundamental rights of people, including the right to association and traveling.

The sad fact as Zakaria and Khalif note is the inability - or perhaps the unwillingness - of governments in much of developing regions such as South Asia to enforce human rights laws to minimize [...]

Other scholars define crime as a deed or an instance of defiance that is considered hazardous to the morals of the community and the concerns of the nation and is legitimately forbidden by the law.

The objective of this research is to establish the level of domestic violence among police officers and relative the behavior to stress, divorce, police subculture, and child mistreatment.

However, in the case in point, the expenses were incurred due to the unwillingness of the taxpayer to comply with the existing legal regulations out of personal considerations; as a result, the court ruled that [...]

Lechmere Inc did not allow the organizers to use the lot, and they opted to use the public strip of land to distribute the handbills to employees entering in the morning and leaving in the [...]

The hardest part in medical identity theft is the fact that it is not easy to alter the records and return them to their normal status just like in financial accounts.

I was aware that my health record was in the form of softcopy because my former physician worked in a facility that used information management system. S: I am interested in accessing my healthcare record [...]

The judicial system in the Republic of China is part of the three-pronged government of the country, besides the executive and legislative arms.

Overall, the use of multiple criteria is partly based on the premise that police officers should be empowered by the administrators of law-enforcement agencies. This is one of the details that should be singled out.

While it is evident that the ongoing investigation into the LA County men's jail violence has unearthed many triggering factors, including the persistent pattern of unreasonable use of force by deputies, overcrowding, substandard jail conditions, [...]

Consequently, a three-member panel of the American Arbitration Association and North American Court of Arbitration for Sport delivered a decision of a lifetime ban to the doctor for his alleged roles in doping violations.

The movie theatre is the main business premise within the area. The primary function of this place is to provide entertainment to the public.

Seeing that one of the burglars damaged the property of the owner, i.e, the mirror that was broken by the burglars, the crime in question can be identified as a trespass to chattels.

For instance, traditionally, it is required that the hotel managers are supposed to refund the losses taken by the customers in the course of waiting for the room, getting to the hotel, etc: "Hotels are [...]

Intellectual property as mentioned earlier is a personal property in the sense that it is mobile and not fixed to a particular land. While most of the personal properties are acquired through other means, intellectual [...]

Therefore, the quality of the criminal law system directly affects the stability, order, and organization in the society because the main purpose of the criminal law is to provide principles of justice according to which [...]

Some of the issues reviewed include material facts surrounding the case, legal reasoning employed by the judges, judgements concerning the case, and the opinions of the judges with regards to s109.

The author underlines the threatening tendency of increasing the level of drug addiction among youth and states the facts that ways of organizing of heir distribution become more and more complicated and effective.

The authors seek to outline the ethical questions that arise as a result of incentives that MCOs provide to the physicians in their network.

The refusal of the hospitals and the health care personnel to negotiate terms with third party payers is a per Se illegal act according to the FTC.

In order to conclude regarding the integrity of the market and effectiveness of proposed regulations to address the market abuse, it is important to understand what aspects of market abuse are identified as influential for [...]

The book uses "the social designation theory to analyze the nature of these gangs". Every citizen should read this book in order to understand the nature of American gangs.

The only instance when actions leading to the death of a patient can be excused in the case of euthanasia. One of the biggest challenges for the judges would be to prove the intention of [...]

The natural decomposition is the surety that the company to the environmentalist organizations and the citizens. There is considerable proof that the company has been the primary producer of the packaging materials for the orchards [...]

The first argument to support the idea that the jury system should be spread widely in the world countries is that the jury system is the key to the unbiased and effective court decision-making that [...]

In addition, the fact that Roy stores various solvents shows that he is exposed to the threat of spilling them and, therefore, causing a chemical burn.

While determining reasonable notice, companies should focus on such aspects as the age of a worker, the length of employment, the health of an employee, and the availability of jobs in the community.

At that, effectiveness is the ability to achieve the goal set whereas efficiency is the ability to accomplish certain tasks in the shortest time and with the use of minimum effort, funds, and so on.

Despite the ruling, 24 of the 29 states are in the process of the implementing the expansion as provided forth by the law.

Terminating the contract of an employee needs extensive legal knowledge and understanding on the part of the employer. Implied terms are provisions that are enforceable through contracts, and the parties in employment contracts take them [...]

The court dismissed the suit citing the general rule that a party that did not enter a contract with a manufacturer cannot sue the manufacturer for negligence, even if the cause of damage can be [...]

From 1970s, legislators passed laws to increase the severity and certainty of punishment as a result of the conservative views on crime.

On the other hand, the mandatory nature of reporting on the root cause analysis does not reflect the difference in hospitals' ability to perform the required procedures. Meanwhile, mandatory reporting requires the practitioner in charge [...]

Hence, RCA is bound to leaving out a situation that is more complex in the investigation of the single cause. Effectiveness of RCA depends on precise identification and description of events leading to the problem.

This paper gives a detail of the different sociological theories, which broadens the understanding of crime. The subcultural theory is a sociological view that stresses the role of social groups in delinquency.

Moreover, much attention should be paid to the enforcement of the legislation because the mere existence of laws does not ensure that the rights of manufacturers such as medical companies are properly protected.

It is important to understand that the rationale behind the formulation of public policies can be failure on the part of either the government or the market.

The focus of DHL Company is to inspire trust in their company, and as a result, they take into account not only the quality of their service but also the ethical, social, and environmental performance.

Because of the desire to reduce the amount of organizational, production and promotion costs to the minimum, the firm defiled several basic ethical and legal principles of marketing, product safety, and intellectual property, which, reasonably [...]

Even though the principle of compensation that is followed in the criminal justice system of the United States is usually discussed as fair, just, and effective to address the needs of citizens who became the [...]

Accidents that occur in business premises as a result of the management's carelessness make the business liable for the injury caused.

The time the firm took to recover from the decline in the quantity of work may function as proof of the need to reduce workers based on redundancy.

When individuals are informed about white-collar crimes, they will be able to detect, evaluate, and avert natural and artificial threats to the welfare of persons and the setups of administrations.

Following the murder of President McKinley, the Upper House unofficially demanded the SS to temporarily guard the leaders of the United States.

The fact that the video is targeted at the specified demographics is denoted in the very introduction of the narration: by enhancing the significance of the speakers' experience in the workplace security and safety of [...]

There is a great number of different moments in the movie which also show peculiarities of the work of this team.

According to the traditional definition, the phenomenon in question means that "the employer to terminate the employment or the employee may leave the employment at any time for no reason".

In particular, the court had to decide if the athletic activities of this person could be regarded as a form of business.

Organized criminals and terrorists are where a crime is planned, coordinated and carried out by criminals working together on a frequent and continuing basis.

Forensic toxicology is the study and analysis of samples with the aim of finding out whether they contain any chemicals, drugs, or toxic substances. Types of certification available include Certification as a Forensic Toxicology Specialist [...]

The weakness of the situation is that not all people are properly prepared for the conditions under which mentally ill people have to live.

The Assembly Bill is designed to reconstruct the approach towards the disposition of funds directed at covering healthcare services for the indigent groups of people since some of these individuals receive opportunities to be covered [...]

According to the decision of the court, a lawyer, who has failed to notify the opponent about his/her error, is guilty of professional misconduct.

Indeed, a closer look at the processes that occur in the court room and in the process of passing the judgment will reveal that the justice's jurisprudential philosophy, in fact, is based on the process [...]

The drafters of the American constitution never saw the importance of including freedom of speech in the country's supreme laws until the First Amendment was made after the revolution.

However, the UAE clearly has admitted that there is a high level of rights infringement against women by the ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

The registrars that award the domain names always maintain that the first person to make an application and pay the required fee becomes the first to acquire the domain.

Our legal issue is to show that Apostolos Mangouras's actions amount to the violation of the EU's Convention on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal laws, the United Nations Convention on the law of [...]

In the first case, the widow of David Harris sued the railroad, while focusing on the idea of negligence. In this case, the railroad has no duty of due care in relation to Harris because [...]

The first situation is connected with the product liability issue and the second situation is connected with the tort and a cause of action.

This paper uses the example of Majid Al Futtaim in Dubai to examine some of the means of dispute resolution that are used by business organizations in the United Arab Emirates to settle corporate disputes.

In addition, the franchise may involve the provision of the right to distribute the products of the seller. In this case, the law requires the seller to guide the buyer in the implementation of the [...]

The studies conducted in various parts of the country show that the effect of sexual assault is adverse in the sense that it affects the victims in various ways.

In the same line of thought, the Fifth Amendment guarantees people the right to remain silent in the interrogation process in a bid to mitigate forced confessions, which may lead to wrongful convictions.

Violation of probation could attract penalties that include fines, revocation of probation, and increment of probation conditions. The main aim of boot camps is to help offenders modify behaviors that are likely to motivate them [...]

When police have reasonable grounds to believe that William Bloutt and Bertha Bloutt committed the robbery, they have the power, not the obligation, to put them under arrest.

One of the issues identified by the interviewee is the failure of the criminal justice system to help convicts integrate into the society.

This is one of the main arguments that can be put forward. These are some of the suggestions that can be made.

Consideration is the legal determinant of a valid contract that has been bargained between the two parties willing to enter into a contract.

The following is a critique of some of the articles that have been put forth to address the subject of criminology.

In this case, 38 neighbors committed an act of omission by not reporting this ordeal to the police. The main advantage of charging bystanders is to make sure that people do not tolerate crime as [...]

This implies that one party should be willing to give the contract and the other party should be ready to take the contract.

It is crucial for the parties to the contract to have the correct information concerning the kind of consideration that materializes after the execution of the contract.

However, in order to create more harmonized services, the government has ratified the Affordable Care Act to help in achieving cost reduction in the health sector. In conclusion, ACA regulations have greatly helped consumers and [...]

Overall, it is possible to say that this particular case illustrates the importance of forensic analysis because the absence of conclusive evidence is one of the reasons why this case continues to be debated by [...]

Prior to the end of the war, the United States implicated Yamashita for his involvement in the atrocities and sued him under the military commission.

The parties involved in this case were Elena Sturdza who was the complainant and appellant, and the United Arab Emirates Federal Government, et.al who were the defendants.

All the police personnel have the right of legitimate use of force when carrying out their duty of enforcing the law.

The architect and the UAE entered negotiations on the contract. In 1996, the UAE sent the final draft which incorporated all the necessary changes and Sturdza agreed to sign the contract.

Texas was the first state in the United States to report a case of Ebola. This will reduce cases of malpractice in the medical institutions.

The cause of the disaster was a storm, which led to a hole in the hull of the vessel, and the fuel leaked into the ocean.

To understand which form of justice is most appropriate in the case of Julio Blanco Garcia, it is necessary to analyze peculiarities of the three forms of justice and apply them to the case.

In this journal, Clark informs the world how the state of pre-trial release in tribal jurisdiction operates in the United States.

Human trafficking refers to the act of acquiring people through the use of improper means. As far as human trafficking is concerned, there is a need for nations to unite and help and guard human [...]

However, an increasing problem in the law courts is the aspect of false testimonies or false confessions that the witnesses, the claimants, and the defendants often present.

The authors also identify some of the major issues and factors encouraging the youth to join different gangs. The book explores "the use of unremittingly tough policies in order to deal with crime and youth [...]

A charge bargain occurs in situation where a prosecutor offers the accused an opportunity to plead to a lesser charge or in situation where the accused has a number of charges to plead guilty to [...]

All the decisions about punishment for the offenders in both countries do not disregard the provisions of the law and/or the code of ethics of the profession.

Learning academies provide the foundation and therefore they cannot be eliminated in training force for the sake of police officers to be.

Thus, the federal government has embarked on the Act as a way of reducing cases of fraud in the health care sector.

One of the reasons for increased youth crime is the failure of parents or communities to effectively mould their children to become responsible citizens.

The goal of such punishment approaches to enhance responsibility, accountability, and undertaking of the committed wrong and the need to reform.

Computer crime is a new type of offense that is committed with the help of the computer and a network. This article aims at evaluating some of the laws established in the United Arab Emirates, [...]

This paper seeks to compare hate crimes in the two metropolitan areas of the New York City and Los Angeles. As a rule of thumb, each hate crime had to indicate the motive of the [...]

It should be mentioned that the employees of restaurants and hotels can also sustain their injuries in the workplace, even if this risk is lower in comparison with other industries.

One of the major peculiarities of the case, which is stressed by the author himself, is that the case is international in its nature.

Hospitex hospital's representative made a mistype in the word 'Goodscan' when filling in the payment information, and this led to the delay in date of receiving the cash by the Goodscan company representatives.

The easiest way to understand the protection of patents and the rationale behind them is by appreciating the fact that patents are part of human rights.

The hospitality industry is the provision of accommodation, food, drinks and holiday activities to people in exchange for money. The State environmental management authority ensures the activities of this industry are controlled to promote a [...]

This paper will highlight the effects of contraband in the prison system and some of the steps being taken to control the issue.