Business executives from different parts of the world travel to Kurdistan to conduct business and taking into consideration the security threats in the ever volatile Middle East, the security of these executives should be well [...]
These same principals are employed in the media industry to safeguard the interests of the community, while in on the other hand they are exploited within the employment sector so as to shield the employer [...]
As per section 11 C of the Summary Offenses Act of New South Wales, if an individual or a person is in possession of a knife in a school or in a public place, the [...]
The state of Nevada is one of the 50 states in America; located 39 148' to the north and 119 743' to the east.
The correctional services offered by the Criminal Justice System of a country are of great importance in the effective running of the society.
As a result, General Yamashita was the commander of all Japanese forces that were operating in Philippine, so he was responsible for their actions.
For example, in the case of bribery, the crime is fuelled both by the person who asks for the bribe and the one who pays it out.
However, to rule out chances of an innocent person being punished, the theory advocates for justice; before punishment is administered, the court should proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.
Since guilty pleas have to be subject to the understanding of the criminal, investigations must show that the alleged person did not know about the crime at the time of performing it.
Under custody, the law applies to cases in which the conditions of custody are compromised and to situations where the suspect is held unfairly. The suspect responded with a yes and this was used as [...]
The analysis was carried out in 2010 and revealed that 40% of all company directors in the UK were foreign. When compared to 2005, this represents a 14% increase in the number of overseas directors [...]
In this gang, very young children are referred to as "Wannabees"; it is claimed that the children at times can be as young as 8 years old.
There are several policies and precedence cases that guide the concept of the use of force in the police force. To avoid such cases in the future, there should be new policies that guide the [...]
Bureaucracies and red tapes, the nature of leadership and generally the organization culture are among the key elements that determine the organizational climate.
Prior to the invention of the internet, the populace with ill intentions of exploiting minors would utilize the following strategies. The committee failed in addressing the role played by the technologies in the circulation of [...]
The rubric for measuring judicial activism is wide and well elaborated in a continuum of dealings by federal judges such as wrong interpretation of accepted methodology, using a policy that is substantive, adjusting interpretations and [...]
The main questions raised in the study included suicide risk for the Danish population over the past three decades and possible relation of the results with the social and health problems of the suicides.
The laws provide for the safety of the users of these means of transport, the materials to be transported, and the public non-users.
As per the recommendations of the 9/11 commission, it is the mandate of the department of homeland security to establish a method which will physically screen 50% of the cargo contained in all passenger airplanes [...]
It is clear that marriage plays an integral role in reducing crime through a shift of priorities that are family centered and the transition to adulthood.
As a result, airport expansions, definitely falling under federal grant, suffers the effects of the Act as airport expansions fall within the purview of the Act.
This is because the industry has such a long bureaucracy that makes the efficient management of the organization very complicated due to the decentralization processes.
Among the objectives of the ACCC is to maintain and enhance business compliance with the Competition and Consumer Act of 2010, formerly the Trade Practices Act of 1974.
When Britton investigated the cause of the poor performance within the police department, he realized that the Los Angeles police department was at odds with the community it was serving.
As the mode and the strategies of policing change, it is expected that the officers in the police force change in order to accommodate the new development in their organization.
An unintentional tort "takes place when a person suffers an injury or loss because of another person's failure to live up to an obligatory duty of care".on the other hand, in unintentional torts, the tortfeasor [...]
The police consider the freedom of a person outside the family set-up as public, and their duty is to serve and protect the public welfare and not their private affairs.
The article is very informative since outlines a couple of the reasons behind the rampant increase in cases of negligence and lack of concern, especially from the government.
According to Nossal and Wood, increasing population of inmates, economic crisis that led to budget deficits, overcrowding in prisons, and the need to reform the prison system are factors that contributed to the emergence of [...]
It has been identified that individuals of the upper class also commit crime by the virtue of the positions that they hold and the trust and power that is vested to them.
This piece of paper gives an in depth evaluation of the new Australian consumer Act in relation to the impact it will have on the rights of the Australian consumers, whether it will be more [...]
Diplomatic passports are usually legal if given out by the worldwide institute the person stands for or property authorities of the state, and only in situations whereby the passport owner is properly qualified as an [...]
The book "Lucky" by Alice Sebold unfolds the rape ordeal that the author went through at the age of 18 years as well as the aftermath of the heinous act on her personal life.
The main purpose of the law is to "provide a basic framework establishing the rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of participants in electronic fund transfer systems".
In this case, the government of the United States of America made an appeal from the judgment made by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.
Knight notes that murders by homosexuals are very common and most of the times they involve both sexes, either as the victims or the assailants.
Furthermore, legal proceedings such as witness and detainee statements, police records, and police interview and court interactions are brought within the insights of the forensic context of law.
Near drowning is another occurrence in the same line and refers to the endurance of a drowning experience entailing a cognitive state or water inhalation and can result to severe derived complications such as death [...]
The paper will look into regulations in the tobacco industry and the nature of the fast food industry that may call for similar regulations as in the tobacco industry with the aim of identifying the [...]
The evidence presented in court for the prosecution of criminals ought to be of high quality for it to be fully relied on when making the ruling.
It is the combination of all the administrative, operational, and technical divisions that are part of the law enforcement agencies. This essay will describe the key elements of law enforcement agencies, the key elements of [...]
In May 2011, the federal government implemented some changes to the income tax laws and one of the areas that was affected was the car fringe benefit calculations and the take home pay of employees.
The elements of a contract were all present in the contract that was between the Black Tie Dry cleaning and Fiona and based on the arguments and explanations the company is not liable to any [...]
In addition, availing the content of their work on the internet ensures that their work is easily accessed by other people in the whole world.
MSC was aware that at the time of the formation of the contract, BSC was proceeding with a bankruptcy arrangement yet it signed the contract.
Jones can effectively use the promise that was given by FAL for the said lease to seek legal redress in a court of law.
To be able to prove negligence in this case, the complainant will have to prove that Matt engaged in an activity that required special skills, that is driving.
The decision for the business to adopt the company structure was due to the convenience associated with this structure. For instance, according to Gibson and Fraser in chapter nine, once the business is registered as [...]
The police officer interviewed some of the passengers in the car and was told about the source of the drugs. The gun will need to be submitted to the lab for fingerprinting to support the [...]
Given that the fish died after being fed rabbit food and the rabbit lost fur because of eating fish food and Georgia ascertained that she was a professional animal lover, the issue that arises is [...]
Persons who are held in jail for two major reasons, one, is that the person convicted of an offense cannot afford to raise bail as the court decision or, two, the person is considered as [...]
The article sums up the problems that have enhanced the tribulations of the state's criminal justice department and point out strategies that have been adapted to solve these challenges. The citizens of California have not [...]
The statutes of Texas require the criminal justice system to carry out an inquest into the causes of deaths that occur mysteriously to ascertain the cause of death.
This is because of government involvement in subsidizing the medical cover costs and putting it mandatory for everyone to have a medical cover or pay a fine.
Player's bankruptcy attorney is willing, he can make modifications to the Schedules and Statements, and change the Plan to reflect the domestic support obligations.
Two years later, an Audi dealer by the name Champion Audi saw the webpage and approached D'Amato seeking to link D'Amato's site to an online store that would sell merchandise with the 'Audi Sport' logo.
A contract is defined as an agreement that leads to obligations of the parties to the agreement, such obligations are recognized by law It is a desire to be bound by the terms of an [...]
The first step is to evaluate the impact of the crisis on the support staff and the victims. The fourth step is the prediction of the events and reactions as a result of the crisis.
The study of the possible causes of crime can be traced from 3700 years before Christ were the Babylonians tried to explain the reasons that motivated people to commit crimes.
From the research conducted on the crime trends in the US, it was found out that the rate of property crime in the country has reduced tremendously in comparison to the United Kingdom, Canada, and [...]
My job as the chief of police would be to ensure that the investigators possess all the necessary resources needed to carry out their functions.
For example, if a person agrees to repair another's house for $1000, and takes $700 before the job, and then gets another job offer and fails to repair the house, the owner of the house [...]
The process of decongesting correctional facilities requires careful planning to come up with the correct procedures that will be implemented to reduce the number of inmates in the correction facilities.
During circumstances similar to the ones mentioned above, the nurses are very cooperative, but the problem here is that the nurses no longer get their breaks as stipulated in their work ethics.
Concerns regarding the interference of technology with the constitutional rights of individuals dating back to several decades ago when the development of wiretapping technology which was used in detection and investigation of the crime was [...]
If there is a clear change in the behavior of a person, then such people are released on parole and this is mainly given to people who have committed non-violent crimes. This is also done [...]
Another indispensable reason shows even when proper accusations are on hand; the weight of the mandatory minimum jail is in the discretion of the prosecutor.
This does not in any way violate the mother's rights because they still have a chance to be with their children once they are fully reformed.
The nature of dilemma facing me as an investigator is of the employment of the moral, personal, and psychological guidelines instilled in me as an individual versus what is stipulated by the police department, where [...]
The first half of the 20th century saw the crime rate increase moderately in a few areas; mostly in burglaries and muggings, but less in murders and drunkenness.
After the bill is introduced, it has to be approved by both houses; the House of Representatives and the senate, for it to become a law.
Sutherland observes that "white-collar crimes are crimes committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation".
The analysis of this company will look into contracts and tort risks that the company faces and find out how this company is facing the many legal risks that it runs. As a shipping company, [...]
Due to the ambiguities and uncertainties in the statutes that lead to absurd interpretations, the United Kingdom has established three persuasive precedents that aid in the interpretation viz.literal rule, golden rule and rule of the [...]
Slavery as an example of inequality caused by property is unique in that not property owning was the main case per se, rather than the fact that the slaves were treated as property.
When a contract has been broken a breach is said to have occurred; breach of contract in legal terms is used to describe actions that has been undertaken by one of the parties in contravention [...]
It has been claimed that the use of tasers is not safe and at times it is likely to cause death.
The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act proposed revisions to the Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code for meeting the demands of digital age by providing a viable legal framework for the information transactions.
Also, a severe weakening of countervailing power in the society can be seen as well Taking a case of the Honda motorcycles and scooter India Ltd, this involves a situation of major industrial relations violence [...]
Bill of Rights asserts that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of the governed, and whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the right and duty of the people [...]
The rule states that; if any disciplinary action is taken on an alleged person 6 months after the offence without the FAA giving any reason for the delay, the respondent can seek the dismissal of [...]
In this respect, the double standards applied by the US refineries and the market rules to the quality of gasoline imported and the one produced on the territory of the USA violated the international regulations [...]
According to legal ethics, lawyer has ethical duty of ensuring that client's information is confidential and thus should always advocate for the interests of the client.
Further, the reputation of a hospital or individual practitioners is at risks, if the cases of sexual misconducts are highly publicized, making the hospitals and accused physicians unable to find clients in their practice.
This is due to the fact that there are economic benefits which the society accrues as a result of an individual overspending.
When refusal to deal was cited by the ECJ as a component of abuse, the Court opened a floodgate of victimization for dominant firms based on the notion that it was sowing a seed for [...]
It is a defense in the sense that the two parties had agreed to perform the contract but had not factored in such other contingencies that could render the whole or part of the contract [...]
While it might give us a glimpse of the nature of the relationship, it does not however state the extent to which the trustee is liable to the beneficiary.
In the UK it is very easy to move from a temporary settlement to a permanent one and it has increased the levels of net migration to the brimming level.
The threat of terrorism substituted communism as the rationale which was used for justifying the state of emergency in America prior to 1990s.
Because this is a form of a commercial contract we must assume therefore that the parties, Agatha and Christie originally intended to be bound.
In the process, the chairman of the board of directors was in return negotiating for the sale of the same shares belonging to the plaintiff to another company for a higher value than that which [...]
They are usually granted after judgment or hearing where the court orders the plaintiff and the defendant to reach an agreement but the settlement has to be within the operations of the law.
The law cases related to environmental dispute that occurred over the smelter in the City of Riverside proposed by RRE International and legal standing of the organization Citizens for a Clean Future if the case [...]
The authors of this paper have covered how the global law on environment emerged, the reasons why the laws emerged, and finally what impacts the laws have had on development in their bid to supporting [...]
Another essential element of mandatory mediation in relation to other forms of alternative ADR's is that it allows the concerned parties to have a win-win configuration.
The interpretation of this meaning is that in case any other legislation goes against or violates any contents of this constitution, then such a legislation will to the extent of the violation of the constitution [...]
One common view that will be maintained in the course of this discussion is the perception that maintains the approach of the philosopher John Rawls.
The issue of fetal protection and the safety of pregnant mothers as provided in the Johnsons' Control fetal policy is one that, not only draws particular attention to the parties that it seeks to address, [...]
In regard to Susan, she is expected to issue tickets; it is clear that the issuance of tickets is part of her normal duties.
Duncan does not like the dirty state of the shop and he is not pleased by the fact that Jarrad is employed to keep the shop clean as part of his duties yet he does [...]
The subject of the contract in the case of the Duncan and Suzan is not illegal as the issuance of the tickets is a legal activity by local authorities.
In a move to improve the cleanliness of the shop, Duncan makes a proposal to increase Jarrad's weekly payments by 30 subject to Jarrad's commitment to ensure that the cleanliness of the shop is improved.
In regards to the case involving Susan and Duncan, some important issues arise that must be looked at to establish if there was a contract between Susan and Duncan that was legally enforceable and also [...]
In this case we need to clearly understand whether the intent to enter into this contract is of a nature that can be termed as legally enforceable or it was just a family relationship between [...]
In his article, Kent Roach sheds some light on the relevance, complexities, and implications of the restorative justice for the criminal justice system in Canada.
For instance, if an employee uses a motor vehicle for both corporate and private purposes, he/she should distinguish between these issues and count only the kilometers passed on business while the total amount of kilometers [...]
This is therefore an analysis of the gender issues that affect the service providers and especially of the female gender during their duty of service in the law and order arena by critically looking at [...]
The article reports the research conducted by the authors on the geographic pattern of homicide among black and white American males.
The reformation of the Rockefeller drug laws was a significant step forward in the way of softening the draconian measures and enhancing the effectiveness of the anti-drug policies through adopting more humane and cost-effective alternatives.
The need to protect organisms in the environment, to preserve the environment as well as make the environment safe for the habitation of both human beings and other living organisms has led to the institution [...]
Under the contract of CG and Cambridge city, the offer was given by the city to the CG to collect the garbage in the area of 3000 households for three years with the expectation of [...]
According to the Company's Act 2006, "the remuneration of the directors will be determined by the directors" in the properly managed company; this means that the board of directors has the mandate to determine and [...]
The US government, through their attorney, Rick Young, sued on behalf of Chicago city for money paid to US Occupational Healthcare Corporation in excess.
The information collected includes the details of the offense and the personal details of the suspect. The amount paid for bail varies depending on the crime."In some circumstances, the bail can be revoked and the [...]
The main purpose of the article is to define how the guidelines define the quality of prisoner's life and can mitigate population in prisons.
The option of the House of Lords to choose from the variety is just an illustration of the concept of the persuasive precedent that the presiding authority is under no legal obligation to apply any [...]
In this essay I demonstrate the rationality of the following quote by Aristotle: "The rule of law is better than that of any individual" The idea of the rule of law is that no one [...]
While the debate is healthy, some scholars argue that the lack of a standard definition hampers how security experts react to the range of crimes committed in the virtual environment.
The investigatory processes to know the individual's character and personality involve the use of complex and simple approaches, and these serve to provide organizations or institutions dealing with child welfare with important information that would [...]