Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 6

The common tort liability that can arise in the Coca-Cola Company is product liability. Companies and other business should be aware of the acts that can lead them to gross tort liability.

However, it is essential to observe that the disclosure of the prescription error, being the right decision from the perspective of healthcare ethics, is followed by specific legal implications. In conclusion, it is possible to [...]

Assessment of the obtained information and the potential error rate is also vital, as it allows the judge to be confident in the results.

The recognition of correction professionals would show them that their work is valued and appreciated and that they are not perceived in the way series and films like to present them.

It is "the liability of the employer for the negligent acts of the employee in the course of his or her employment".

It was found that overcrowding contributed to the reduction of the mental well-being of prisoners and the correctional staff; nevertheless, there was no relationship between the decrease in crime rates and the increase in the [...]

Although these studies have offered helpful insights into the use of the insanity plea and the insanity defense, it is still not clear how the sentences arising from the insanity plea operate and what factors [...]

The UK legal system has many differences in comparison to the legal systems of different countries starting from the existing hierarchy of judicial precedents and ending with the division of the English legal profession into [...]

The former can be characterized as the outcome of the constructive or adverse influence of rewards/ penalties on the individual's behavior.

The concept of judicial review implies that the decisions of state and federal courts are subject to review and change in cases the decisions violate constitutional rights of the United States citizens or any other [...]

If we connect the theory of relative deprivation to the stratified society and criminology, we will see that the majority of social movements are based on the phenomenon of relative deprivation.

The National Employment Standards comprised of the conditions provided to employers. 3 The employers have to observe and adhere to the maximum hours the employees have to work in a week.

In the United States of America, the mafia is also referred to as "the Mafia", "Mob", the American Mafia or the National Crime Syndicate, which encompasses all organised crime including the mafia. Thus the administration [...]

The peculiarity of this procedure is that the arbitrator is the one to resolve the conflict and decide what both parties must adhere to.

This paper discusses the use of force by law enforcement officers and attempts to explain why it is necessary to allow the use of force in the enforcement of law and administration of justice.

One of the most important components of the criminal justice system is a code of ethics, which governs the behavior and conduct of professionals working within the system.

The process of values acquisition can be viewed as a lifelong experience, which starts from the moment that early childhood development starts, and up to the point of the demise of one's personality.

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

Nadine Lehrer, who has been studying the bill, asserts, "The bill was developed in the wake of 1930's farm crisis to bring farm incomes up to the par with the required minimum incomes".

On the other hand, proponents of the ban argue that assault weapons encourage crime and misuse of weapons. They argue that America is a democratic country and the right of the people to carry weapons [...]

Overall, the appeals court affirmed the district's court ruling that the perceived disparate impact on female candidates for failing the fitness test run could not be ruled as a discriminatory employee selection practice but as [...]

The majority of the young offenders is vulnerable and can resort to the sexual act in exchange for favors from the guards.

As mentioned in the introduction, building more prisons is just one of the many solutions to the problem of overcrowding in prisons.

The first part of the paper will address effects of tobacco smoking on personal health and the economy. Cognizant of its international obligation and the aforementioned health effects of tobacco smoke, Jamaica enacted a law [...]

While procedural law denotes the body of law that prescribes rules, rights, and statutes governing the proceedings of a court of law in criminal, civil and administrative lawsuits, substantive law is basically a statutory law [...]

As the director of the county juvenile court, the research question related to the problem at hand should state as follows: What are cost effective methods of solving the proliferation of violent street gangs in [...]

9 It is to be well understood that the declaration of the presence of native land rights in the land in Australia in no way acted to oust the proprietary rights of the non-indigenous groups.

Before coming up with ways and measures of curbing identity theft that may be targeted on the executives, it is necessary to identify the modes and means by which the theft may be executed.

The data received as a result of the crime and victimization surveys state that the rates of crime and victimization in the United States are different depending on many factors which are the demographic factors, [...]

As such, I agree that the digital era has presented a fair deal of challenges to copyright to the extent of making it obsolete. The profit that is accrued is not shared to the copyright [...]

Under this model the manager in charge of implementing the treatment plan on the client is expected to have great regard for the juvenile and that such a person has an inward ability to discover [...]

The scale of women and children trafficking is very large but difficult to put a figure on the actual number of women and children trafficked all over the world. The demand for people to work [...]

Critics of Rawls theories included Nozick who held the view that inequality had to exist in the economic distribution of goods or wealth in a society.

For a search and arrest warrants to be issued, the requirements include that the officer produces a probability cause, which justifies the search.

Moreover, the deficiencies of an attorney must not deprive a person of the right to fair trial. To a great extent, this case represents the latest stages in the historical development of the right to [...]

Proponents argue that information about the rape victim should be disseminated in an honest and truthful manner while opponents assert that the identity of rape victims should not be revealed given the serious nature of [...]

Community service is one of the punishments used for the petty offenders to pay the community back for the trouble they caused.

Kahan, therefore, proposes that the use of shame as punishment is put to trial and if found effective, must be implemented as an alternative to the imprisonment.

However, after a month of trial, the jury stipulated that Samsung had infringed Apple's patents and it was supposed to pay $1.

They also set minimum wages that any employees must be paid and also promote the rights of employees in the workplace Environmental protection seeks to promote environmental friendly operations in the workplace while legal protection [...]

Accommodations for students depend on the disability type that the student has, and whether the disability allows the student to get an accommodation in the institution.

This trend is evident because of the increased cases of offences that necessitate the urgency in the development of quick risk assessment methods.

While harsh punishments appear to offer a solution to the problem, this measure may be detrimental to the welfare of the child in the case where the abuser is its guardian.

The major contention in this case was the National Industrial Recovery Act where the US Congress gave authority to the President of the United States to prohibit the transportation of petroleum within and outside the [...]

This is attributed to the fact that juvenile courts are predisposed to have the best interest of the children or youths in consideration and offer some form of defense and rehabilitation for the children in [...]

The officer may also make a surprise visit to the offender's home or workplace during the rehabilitation period to check the progress of the offender that has been observed by the relatives and the workmates.

Considering an example of Alton Logan who had to spend 26 years in jail for the crime he did not commit, the problem of legal ethics is going to be considered in the light of [...]

The final version of the bill is agreed upon after the debate and members of both the senate and the house then subject it to a vote.

Megan's Law is served to notify the vast majority of sexual offenders in society; its study allows to analyze the impact of the law on inhabitants of New Jersey, its effects and effectiveness, and the [...]

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

They designate the strong points of the leap all through to the warrant and may restrict the generality of the claim.

He argues that the American social structure and its structure of wealth distribution and that dream of achieving the 'American dream' all require crime to maintain social stability in the face of structural inequality.

It seems to be the most aggressive form of imprisonment under the conditions of which the prisoner is tortured physically and mentally.

Stewart and Bacanovic claim that they had a pre-existing agreement to sell the stock when it reached a specific price and that the sale was unrelated to the nonpublic information.

The main stakeholders of the case are Rosalinda Iturralde, who filed a lawsuit alleging wrongful death and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the defendants: HMC, Dr. Ricketson and HMC breached the standard of care [...]

The Thorne family lived in a suburb of Sydney, and the dog hairs were found on Bradley's clothing, which was discovered in a different suburb.

Parole is a right granted by the government to a convicted individual for breaking the law in order to reduce their time in confinement or release them before the end of the legally prescribed sentence.

Officially titled the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act remains a key piece of labor legislation in the United States.

Due to a lack of direct evidence of Kellar's off-the-clock work, the district court defended the employer and dismissed Kellar's claims.

The Ninth Circuit Court's decision to allow the evidence to be used against Kyllo prompted the latter to call for a writ of certiorari.

John Dillinger's life, in the end, was characterized by his involvement in criminal activity, his seductive nature, and the confusing manner in which others saw him.

Without the proper processing and handling of evidence, the forensic value of the proof may be inadmissible to the court or diminish.

According to this theory, if one window in a structure is broken and is not restored, the rest of the windows will soon follow.

It may be argued that Lord Bridge's test is a perfect example of the law perpetuating inequality, resulting in the conclusion that a woman's place is frequently in the house3.

The duty of care principle is a central concept of the tort law, as it implies that one individual accepts the duty to guarantee safety and the absence of harm to another individual.

Taser International, Inc.was the maker of the Taser X26 stun gun that police officers used to arrest Daren Eugene Fontenot; Fontenot passed away as a result of the incident.

As a result of the criminal allure it exudes, the Cosa Nostra maintains connections with all of the major criminal groups, both in Italy and across the world.

The Crown appealed these acquittals in the Supreme Court, and in a majority decision, the court agreed to the propositions and convicted the accused with respect to all his counts.

The real issue before us is whether we should replace the doctrine of joint and several liability with one in which the liability of codefendants to the plaintiff is apportioned according to each defendant's respective [...]

For instance, if the ship-owner was to inspect the goods on behalf of the charterer, and a third party is involved at the port, then the rights and duties are imposed on them.

Determining the value and effectiveness of this practice can be performed by analyzing the approach in the context of interaction with the police forces involved in the investigation of criminal offenses.

In the case of a fire, it is crucial at the beginning to identify the area affected by the fire, explore the possibilities of access to the disaster location, and, if necessary, take additional measures, [...]

In the court, Griffin refused to testify, and according to a prosecutor, the defendant's choice was evidence of guilt. In turn, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt based on [...]

In the US, a combination of factory owner neglect and a desire to maximize profits drove factories to ignore the moral and ethical concerns of their workers.

The aim of the analysis will be to determine whether there is a relationship between the X-variables and Y-variables as hypothesised.

Included in the NPA in the state of Colorado are the disciplinary procedures, the delegation of law, the requirements that are needed for licensure and prospective authority, laws on the establishment of the BON, its [...]

The criminal justice system needs to hold onto the presumption of innocence, and it is much more likely to work for first-time offenders than multiple offenders.

The law defines capacity as the capability to understand and retain information relating to the decision and to weigh it in balance when making a decision.

Many academics argue that the US should abandon the jury system in favor of a trial by the bench. A defendant may face a bench trial or a jury trial in a criminal case in [...]

In the three-tier court system, there are the trial courts, the first appellate courts, and the U.S. Thus, the three-tier court system consists of a regional court, an appellate court, and a supreme court.

The bill is of enormous benefit to patients in rural settings as it increases healthcare access where nurse practitioners in the clinics can prescribe medications to them.

Even though the suspect did not obligate to the offense, he had the objective to do so, and hence the punishment ought to be the same.

Nevertheless, Tate continued with his criminal acts and was sentenced to 30 years in prison for violating the terms of the probation.

The United States Supreme Court announced that a person accused of a crime and cannot afford to pay for lawyers to represent them has the right to an attorney. According to the Court, Gideon had [...]

The purpose of the presentation is to review some crime trends in the jurisdiction and provide some commentaries regarding the matter.

To facilitate an understanding of cultural criminology, it is essential to consider such ideas as crime as culture, culture as crime, the media constructions of crime control and corruption, and political dimensions of culture, crime, [...]

The inference from this view is that Charles Hardy did not deprive Teresa Harris of equal rights for employment and was a person who was taught to disrespect women.

In 1934, a new building was erected on the island, cause of the transfer of Alcatraz to the U.S.federal system. Guantanamo was established in 2002 on the grounds of a U.S.military base.

With the involvement in people's credit activity, it becomes significant that people report instances of identity theft to agencies since identity theft often results in credit abuse.

E-commerce law in Saudi Arabia specifies how the jurisdiction of an online seller is determined. Thus, the jurisdiction of the business coincides with the place of its activity according to e-commerce law.

There is a number of theoretical perspectives aimed at explaining what stands behind rape, that is, how rape is reinforced by, why it is more widespread in specific concepts, and what a rapist's motivations for [...]

Multiple crimes can be linked to a specific criminal, and the profile can be used to predict the future actions of the identified criminal. Another proof of the effectiveness of profiling is the formation of [...]

In that, just as the Lord, who is Heaven commands its subject, should obey, the people of Japan should pay heed to their imperial powers and submit to avoid harsh consequences, which are otherwise termed [...]

However the Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging reported that texting while driving is a greater distraction than talking to others due to the time eyes are away from the road and the amount of cognitive [...]

The theory of broken windows is a theory in criminology that considers minor offenses not only as an indicator of the criminogenic situation but also as an active factor affecting the serious crime rate.

In addition, the scientific method involves testing and validating the accuracy of the outcomes with the help of the relevant disciplines, for instance, investigative psychology.

An integrated community approach enables the community members to have faith in the police department since the community members themselves are involved in ensuring that criminal activities are curbed.

Those supporting the action of defunding want to see true reforms in the police force and cut down the 'rotten trees' that have been tarnishing the reputation of the institutions.

Therefore, deterrence is meant to ensure that punishments are so harsh that members of the public will fear committing a crime that will lead them to the same punishment.

However, the application of laws and the imposition of punishments for minors is difficult due to their age. The purpose of this essay is to investigate the causes and effects of juvenile crime.

The strict logic of the era of classicism, presented in the works of Cesare Beccaria, speaks of the full responsibility of a person for his misdeeds.

The main purpose of such prisons should be isolation and safety leading to correction instead of destruction of personal character or mental and physical harm.

The central issue that emerges in this case is how to enact the appropriate laws of protecting copyrights and intellectual property on the web to ensure that personal information is not compromised.

He objected to the evidence retrieved from his bedroom, arguing that it was the outcome of an unconstitutional search. The court also concluded that the warrantless search was reasonable because there was a valid reason [...]

The provision of state aid to EU corporations is defined by article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

After McDonalds failed to silence the two, it sued them for libel and wanted reparation as part of the settlement. This particular advice was surmised to a single premise that in legal trial touching on [...]

Canada became the second country in the world to legalize the cultivation and consumption of cannabis in 2018. Besides, the substance is addictive, and it is challenging to stop consuming it.

The paper's outline consists of five parts: the case summary, the legal situation regarding organ trade, the thesis definitions criteria, the thesis versus the case, and the conclusion.

Medical errors are some of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the US, which underscores the importance of the medical liability system in the country.

The codification of the operative principles and the establishment of a comprehensive statutory framework may be a viable means of eliminating these complexities and uncertainty, and to harmonize the law on easements.

The decision profoundly impacted public perception and the role of youth in the criminal justice system felt to this day In 1994, Christopher Simmons who was 17 at the time developed a plan with two [...]

It is noted also that Mohamed rejected the police demands and "continued to advance on the victim and was shot by officers".

Therefore, the audience can learn that the overall evaluation Archer is making implicates the need to value all people in society and to live morally.

The cause and effects of young person offending and the state of Victoria's youth justice system have become a subject of broad debate after a series of violent cases in justice centers.

This assignment will demonstrate that the New York Health Act is essential in the state, present current evidence and my personal stance, and create a letter to Governor Andrew Cuomo to promote the policy.

Evidence – any object, item or statement, legally submitted to competent tribunal in order to establish matter of fact under investigation.

This paper aims at analyzing the case of Arizona University from the point of view of ethics and reaching a solution corresponding to the ethical principles, along with discussing alternative perspectives on the subject.

Several court cases based on the 'compensation culture' phenomenon in the UK and how the UK courts have adapted to the 'compensation culture' have been employed in the analysis.

The recognition that Thelma and Louise get when they become the ones who occupy the traditionally male roles is what might make the audience think about the irrational approach of the community to numerous issues [...]

The Second Amendment refers to the portion of the Bill of Rights that gives people the freedom to bear arms. The clamor by the citizens to have the right to bear arms dates back to [...]