The theory of ethical formalism that is represented in the works of Immanuel Kant and John Rawls argues that "the only thing truly good is goodwill, and that what is good is that which conforms [...]
The paper aims to analyze Article I of the Florida Constitution in terms of its correspondence to the U.S. The rights of the accused and of crime victims describe the rights of those involved in [...]
According to oztunc & Pierre, the UAE is ranked 119 in the global press freedom data, classifying the country as one of the most suppressive regarding the liberty of expression.
The technology of the thermal imaging device is not used publicly and considered unreasonable; therefore, the agent was not allowed to perform it without a warrant.
Williams became the main suspect of the young girls' abduction after a young boy confessed to have seen him at the YMCA packing his car a large bundle of clothes with "skinny and white legs" [...]
The examination of the issue by relying on the example of Gerald Bostock was advantageous for establishing proper employment practices in this respect.
Chalmers, a devoted Christian, saw it her duty to share her Lord's gospel, and thought it her duty to inform her coworkers of their "improper conduct" in the face of God.
The main challenge in applying this method is to ignore the unique conditions of the cases, which can complicate generalization and lead to erroneous conclusions.
However, the author provides an insight into the matter by claiming that the policy concerning workplace discrimination took a dramatic turn in the early 1960s upon adoption of the Title VII of the Civil Rights [...]
Both the 2021 Dream Act and the variants of the Dream Act contained in the larger bill called the 2021 Dream and Promise Act is now in front of Congress.
The judgment favors the people of America in that the citizens have a right to express and demonstrate when fighting for their rights.
In the first part, Contreras situates the participants in the historical context of New York and the South Bronx, the epicenter of the rise of the crack-cocaine trade.
Therefore, it is vital to reinforce the legal measures against child abuse, including the enhancement of legal repercussions for the perpetrators of the specified type of crime.
In conclusion, the topic of consumer protection is vital, and there is a need for people to know their rights to protect themselves.
At the beginning of the video, the presenter smashes a bloodstain with a hammer and says, "there we go," with relief.
By defining the key characteristics of a criminal, one will be able to identify the possible suspects and, therefore, locate the perpetrator faster.
The felony murder rule should make felons more conscious of the adverse effects of crimes that they engage in and reduce the number of felonies.
About a block down the street, it begins to sprinkle and Latisha opens the umbrella and realizes that it is not hers.
It can be argued that one of the most prominent applications of the labeling theory is racial profiling, which also accounts for the oversaturation of African Americans in crime and criminal justice system.
They are the variables that can easily be altered and controlled by the prosecutors and the police, thus leading to changes in the eyewitness identification process.
With the number of content creators, companies, and independent artists on the platform, as well as the inclusion of the ability to monetize problems of Fair use and Copyright have begun to emerge on the [...]
Nevertheless, the court protected the school and claimed the reasonability and fairness of its actions regarding the suspension of the students.
From the statistics, it is clear that paying employees by their appearance is inhumane and should never be endorsed in society or any organization.
Other examples of inequality in terms of criminal justice are international corporations' frauds and embezzlements on a grand scale by politicians that remain even unnoticeable while ordinary people are sentenced to imprisonment for less serious [...]
The given case will be analyzed from the perspective of Agnew's General Strain Theory, which was built upon the ideas of Merton's Strain Theory. Agnew's general strain theory fails to explain the magnitude and range [...]
The problem of the press and system of justice interconnection is based on the freedom rights against the interference of the government in accordance with the Constitution Amendments; every person has a right to a [...]
The termination and cancellation of the contract may occur when either party puts an end to the contract because of the breach of another party.
However, the court found no evidence on the part of the respondent to utilize Mars goodwill in its Maltesers products. The trademark infringement claim was also dismissed on the basis that the public could not [...]
On the contrary, if the intercourse or the penetration is done without the consent of the victim, the act becomes a rape case.
The article highlights that the traditional probation's orientation of allowing offenders to engage in repeat violations of their sentence conditions before having their probation revoked is no longer attractive as it reinforces a prison culture [...]
The objective of this paper is to analyze the reasons behind the delay in the execution of and escalation of costs in the Holyrood Project.
American Jail Association is well-known and the most efficient organization that supports the individuals working in these jails.
However, the misguided notion that anything with the potential to cause harm is immoral has led to the limited effectiveness of punitive policies with regard to the reduction of the negative impacts of drug use.
The bill provides the right to the Department of Health and Human Services to generate grants to public and nonprofit private health care institutions with the aim of providing treatment for diabetes in minority communities.
The cases of criminal homicide are further separated into murder and manslaughter, with the key difference laying in whether the law determines the presence of malice in the act.
The article discusses the extent of legal regulation of child protection in the US within the scope of three periods that are suggested by the author.
One of the aspects that should be considered in order to address the dire situation that convicts find themselves in is the problem of reintegration of ex-prisoners into society.
In the course of the case, the idea of the corporate alter-ego was also presented to clarify the actions of the Wildhorn Ranch, Inc.owner: The theory of corporate alter-ego requires plaintiff to show that an [...]
This paper examines the extent to which the Bill of Rights has influenced the way of life of the people of America in line with the Constitution.
For example, in the UK inheritance tax is a tax levied on the assets of the dead and therefore estate tax and inheritance tax are more of the same.
Though these guidelines are available and are supposed to be the guide for the justice system, there have been cases when there have been a miscarriage of justice, which has led to the conviction of [...]
Putrefaction is one of the stages in the decomposition of a dead body. According to Middleton, putrefaction is the decomposition of a dead body, which involves the breakdown of the proteins in the dead organism.
This paper critiques the journal article "Risk and risk management in juvenile justice" by looking at its contribution to the topic, how poor professionalism and ethical issues surrounding risk assessment of juveniles may lead to [...]
The article claims that both the environment and the person's experiences contribute to the development of serial killer tendencies. It has been noted that the lack of continuity in serial killing is due to a [...]
The law enforcement agencies such as the FBI maintain that there are several serial killers in the United States and they are expected to increase and hit an epidemic proportion with many people losing their [...]
Starting 18th to the 19th century, there were different rights awarded to laborers to ensure that they were not taken advantage of especially due to their lack of formal education and their lack of financial [...]
My personal perception of organized crime comes from movie enactments of Sicilian and Italian mafia, which portray it as the activities of a large group of criminals who join forces to plan and commit crimes.
However, for an organization to grant the employee leave, the employee must give adequate notice to the organization informing the organization the reasons for requesting the leave.
In the case of the tort reforms, the idea is to reduce the charges on malpractice insurance in order to make the medicine field significantly lucrative.
The research suggests that family members and caregivers are the main abusers of the elderly population and, therefore, there should be specific programs that can contribute to enhancing the quality of life of senior members [...]
Jane, as the head of the Payroll Department, is obligated to make choices and take actions that will contribute to the welfare and interests of the community as well as the company.
This paper seeks to evaluate different situations that involve the theft of a laptop with the aim of establishing the types of crime they represent and the differences between them.
The duty of care is determined through the evaluation of whether the defendant has an obligation not to conduct himself/herself in a manner that can be injurious to the plaintiff under all circumstances considered in [...]
The move to embrace the novel technology has led to the emergence of a new form of crime and behavior referred to as "hacking". Today, the term is used to refer to individuals engaged in [...]
Training and counseling of the youth on a career is important in preventing juvenile violence and delinquent behaviors related to gang activities.
In civil and other legal literature, the categories of contract and agreement are considered to be synonymous. However, there are a number of differences between the two concepts.
Contracts with the Internet service providers can be valid or not with references to the aspect of legality and the parties' approaches to following the conditions of the contract.
This particular scenario was seen in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis wherein despite the bailouts provided by the government there was still a certain degree of hesitance on the part of banks to [...]
The argument is that Murphy was not under arrest at the time of the search and seizure of the fingernail scrapings.
The Australian justice structure is centered on an elementary belief in the canon of law, justice and the autonomy of the judges.
Second, employers should be allowed to hire replacement workers not only to maintain the balance of relative bargaining power between the companies and the labor unions but also to reduce labor costs.
The diffuse model is implemented by all the courts of general jurisdiction without the creation of a specialized body of the judicial review.
For example, if a person has a bank account in a particular state, then he or she is under the jurisdiction of this state's court.
Burglary, in contrast, is a property crime in that the offenses are categorized as criminal activities against property and do not have to involve harming another person. It is vital to distinguish the intention of [...]
The present paper examines three important decisions issued by the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights in the field of state responsibility, human rights, and rights and duties of international [...]
Overall, the use of multiple criteria is partly based on the premise that police officers should be empowered by the administrators of law-enforcement agencies. This is one of the details that should be singled out.
Intellectual property as mentioned earlier is a personal property in the sense that it is mobile and not fixed to a particular land. While most of the personal properties are acquired through other means, intellectual [...]
While determining reasonable notice, companies should focus on such aspects as the age of a worker, the length of employment, the health of an employee, and the availability of jobs in the community.
At that, effectiveness is the ability to achieve the goal set whereas efficiency is the ability to accomplish certain tasks in the shortest time and with the use of minimum effort, funds, and so on.
This paper will highlight the effects of contraband in the prison system and some of the steps being taken to control the issue.
It is imperative to note that some of these theories are swallowed up in the initial five, and so for the purposes of this paper, only the fundamental aspects of these theories will be discussed.
Self-control theory is a criminology theory that analyzes the lack of self-control and its influence on crime rates. This article considers the influence of the self-control theory when dealing with juvenile sex offenders.
For example, during the probation period, the offender is ordered to abide by the orders given by the probation officer. The major target of probation is to change the behavior of the offender.
The generalisation about the people who commit crime indicates flaws in the processes of thinking and possible outcomes. It appears that the society chooses to pay attention to crime committed by specific groups, such as [...]
Gains due the cancellation or sale of a life insurance policy before the death of the insured are subject to taxation because the tax exemption on proceeds from life insurance applies upon the death of [...]
Despite the doubtless coherency of the argument and reasonability of the claims, Martinson's article has a number of problems, which brings the significance of the results a few notches down.
He was born in a family of four and his father was named George Gein who was a tanner and a carpenter but a drunkard.
'An insured's duty of disclosure under the Common Law and the Insurance Contracts Act 1984' Under section twenty one of the 1984 Insurance Contacts Act, all customers are required to make a disclosure to the [...]
As per the recommendations of the 9/11 commission, it is the mandate of the department of homeland security to establish a method which will physically screen 50% of the cargo contained in all passenger airplanes [...]
In May 2011, the federal government implemented some changes to the income tax laws and one of the areas that was affected was the car fringe benefit calculations and the take home pay of employees.
Natural crime is therefore described as a crime against the fundamental laws of nature as well as personal crimes which could or may sometimes not be against the laws of the land.
The first half of the 20th century saw the crime rate increase moderately in a few areas; mostly in burglaries and muggings, but less in murders and drunkenness.
Because this is a form of a commercial contract we must assume therefore that the parties, Agatha and Christie originally intended to be bound.
The option of the House of Lords to choose from the variety is just an illustration of the concept of the persuasive precedent that the presiding authority is under no legal obligation to apply any [...]
In its current manifestation copyright also protects a number of other legal rights, including the right to present or stage any given work of art, the right to exhibit any given image, the right to [...]
This is in relation to pharmaceutical drugs and the flow of information to such countries. South Africa is a developing nation that has had a share of setbacks in implementing the TRIPS agreement.
In conclusion, the essay will examine the concerns raised from the use of these private security companies. The traditional description of a mercenary is a person who engages in an armed conflict and he is [...]
This is similar to the situation in the US where the office of the Attorney and a section of the Criminal Fraud Department of Justice handles mortgage prosecution cases.
Where their negligent acts concerning health officials, their employer is illustrated an independent official thus they are not vicariously liable hence, whether a party is a independent official or an employee generally depends on the [...]
In order to assess what are the causes of organized crime, we have to begin by assessing what organized crime is.
Corruption is one of the most common police deviant behaviors, a fact that has tainted the image of the police in society.
In case there are two applicants for the same patent right, the European patent Authority and Japan Patent Authority offer the right to the first applicant and not the applicant who claims to have made [...]
To start with the validity of the contract should be analyzed; and in this case, the two contracting parties had agreed mutually to reduce the amount to a nominal amount of $150.
The CA 2006 preserves the primacy of the main goal of companies namely the maximisation of profits for the advantageous of the company shareholders.
The factor is that the regulation of domestic arbitration has a distinguished enforcement mechanism, while international arbitration can be seen lacking where the implementation of the awards can be more than difficult in "cases where [...]
Of these alternatives, community service has been one of the most employed and therefore opened a room for debates with the proponents feeling that the option is a remedy to all the prison problems while [...]
Thus, a DNA match corroborates the fact that the suspect was at the scene of the crime and this evidence can help in establishing a case against the suspects.
As a result, Chitra has developed claustrophobia and refuses to leave her house; in-law, we see that an inevitable accident is one that can not be prevented by the exercise of ordinary care, caution, or [...]
Statute of Limitations, in general, refers to the laws setting the deadline for filing lawsuits within a certain time after the occurrence of the events, which constitute the source of the claim.
The focus of this paper is to examine the extent to which the UAE space law clarifies the functional, personal, and physical scope of the application of the UN space treaties.
This paper will review the evidence and ethical implications of the punishment and correction relationship in the United States and examine the ethics of incarceration in relation to the alternative methods of punishment.
In conclusion, legal requirements, and steps needed to start a sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation influence businesspersons decisions on the form of business they will set up.
It is a manifestation of the wrong or careless attitude to work and entails the infliction of significant damage or violation of the rights and legitimate interests of people.
The security management and occupation health and safety officers recommend risk assessment of the possibility of violence and provide possible measures and programs that may significantly assist in the prevention of their occurrence of workplace.
J Simpson's car had blood stain on his driveway and the stain was similar to those that were found at the site of the violent crime.
While the progress on the societal issue is evident as more states break the barriers to ballot boxes, there are about 6 million Americans are deprived of the right to vote.
Jose and Lou can make Miriam be a quasi-partner in the business, "since Miriam is willing to give capital to start the business in return to be made a shareholder".
Levco rejected to execute arbitration in Ohio and passed a statute that allowed them to void out the state arbitration. The court established that CCI demonstrated, as a matter of law, the presence of a [...]
1 Contextualism, on the other hand, is the approach that places the highest value on the interpretation of a text for the purpose of finding its objective meaning viewing it in the circumstances in which [...]
According to Holmes and Holmes, the majority of child predators "had some form of child pornography in their possession at the time of arrest".
There are those activities that are universally accepted to constitute a crime, however, what might be considered the crime in one society is not necessarily applied in a different society; for instance, looking at a [...]
Some people believe that copyright infringement of information in the internet do not have weight as compared to the information in the traditional printed world.explains that one of the reasons why we should guard copyright [...]
This paper explores the factors influencing the implications of the Fair Work Act and to do so this paper has scrutinised the overview of fair work act 2009, view of the minister, view of the [...]
In this case, there is the need to ensure that the specifics of the statistics are very clear from the start.
There are thirteen victim classifications; the female, the young, the old, the tormentor, the depressed, the lonesome and heartbroken, the wanton, the minorities, the mentally defective, the immigrant, the dull normal, and the blocked, exempted [...]
Yahoo's refusal to grant email access to the family on account of their policy cannot be a welfare enhancing policy due to the emotional pain it caused the family and as such, it is morally [...]
For example, in most cases, the success of tracing stolen vehicle and the criminals will depend on the installed criminal tracking device, since the police and other criminal authorities are able to obtain crucial links [...]
In the case of Grutter, the Court considered the admissions policy for the University of Michigan Law School, and in the case of Gratz; the Supreme Court struck down the undergraduate affirmative action program at [...]
The employment contract sets forth the terms and obligations of the employer's relationship with the employee. After signing the employment contract, the employee and employer are both bound under the terms of the contract.
They play a crucial role in the criminal justice field where they spot, check and supervise offenders on parole and recommend actions entailing formulation of rehabilitation plans and treatment of offenders, including conditional release, their [...]