Common Law Essay Examples and Topics

In the reasoning part of the court decision, the viewpoints of the judges were divided between that of the Majority judges and that of the Dissenting judge.

The article below illustrates the hierarchical arrangement of the court structure in England and Wales. In England and Wales, the Supreme Court is the utmost court of petition.

The characters in the story are the peasant Khun-Anup, the vassal of the high steward, Nemtynakht, the high steward Rensi, and King Nebkaure.

The essential facts supporting Lambert's position were the execution of the transfer of documents that required his review. Lambert talked about his obligations, the timing of the services, and their cost, which may confirm the [...]

In order to understand the nature of tort law in this country, it is necessary to begin by analyzing the existing civil law provisions.

Speeding affects the health and the economy of the country, hence people should learn to drive safely. Speeding mainly affects the economy of the country and the health of the individuals involved in motorist crashes.

Intellectual property as mentioned earlier is a personal property in the sense that it is mobile and not fixed to a particular land. While most of the personal properties are acquired through other means, intellectual [...]

In the process of creating the law there are some specific considerations which have to be taken care of: "a need to have the consent of the people, a system of checks and balances, and [...]

In addition to evolution of the Justinian law, other laws such as the Cannon and the merchant's custom have greatly contributed to the development of currently existing civil laws.

As a result of negotiations, the parties concluded that the fireworks were offered to be sold at retail, after which the price per unit of fireworks, which is the main subject of the contract, was [...]

In the course of the case, the idea of the corporate alter-ego was also presented to clarify the actions of the Wildhorn Ranch, Inc.owner: The theory of corporate alter-ego requires plaintiff to show that an [...]

Negative rights determine the obligations of the government and other people to refrain from certain actions in relation to the individual.

In the case of Grutter, the Court considered the admissions policy for the University of Michigan Law School, and in the case of Gratz; the Supreme Court struck down the undergraduate affirmative action program at [...]

Thomas Aquinas for just and unjust war, according to the Reverend; unjust law is not based on natural and eternal laws.

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children reports that approximately 50,500 children in the UK are at risk of child abuse.

The most important aspect of the Magna Carta is that it placed everybody under the rule of the law, or as stated in the document, the rue of the land.

I believe that the concept of retributive justice is more realistic for the justice system as it dwells on the idea of crime as a malfunction in a governmentally-controlled human social system.

The first act in the Human Services field, The Social Security Act, was developed during the Great Depression and offered relief to families.

While judges on a case-by-case basis make laws under the Common Law tradition, the legislative body is responsible for enacting laws under the Statutory Law tradition. Under the Common Law tradition, it is the responsibility [...]

At the same time, the advantage of this law is the expansion of benefits, which will contribute to the refinement of individuals and the equal provision of payments.

This connection is understandable from the point of view of the breadth of the spread of the legal field in the country.

Even though the defendant promised a reward for the information, the court held that no contract was formed as "the offer of the reward had not been communicated to the claimant prior to his giving [...]

Another difference that is evident in the two essays is the perception of the two authors as to the usefulness of the ID system.

The first case that was linked to the admissibility of expert evidence was Frye v.the United States, in 1923. The Kumho case expanded the use of Daubert and Joiner guidelines to any expert evidence.

On the contrary, a man can think of committing a misdemeanor, a petty crime or even a felony in the attempts to lend someone a helping hand and improve the conflicting situation.

The same rule applies to the wording of the contract in question. The judges ruled that the disturbing and unbeneficial implications of a contract do not qualify for its frustration.

Officer Taylor also had reasonable suspicion to make the driver stop the care as it had similar characteristics to the vehicle involved in a road-side killing of a police officer.

The doctrine of equitable estoppel acts as a rule of evidence where matters in contention can be proved by demonstrating to the court how the rule applies in the circumstances of the case.

Some of the illegal leisure activities within our present-day world comprise engaging in pornography, excessive consumption of alcohol and smoking. The third illegal leisure activity is the smoking of cigarettes and engaging in drug abuse.

The nanny state is a term that describes the overriding influence of a government or its policies on people's freedom of choice.

Whole life insurance is a fixed premium insurance policy which covers the lifetime of the insured, as long as the premiums are paid.

The quasi-experimental design of the study reveals that the programs directly contributed to the reduction of gun violence in the following decades.

To maintain peace, speed up reaction times, and improve the quality of life in towns and cities, the current aim is to offer assistance to police operations safely, responsibly, and transparently.

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is a supplement to the Sex Discrimination Clause of the Civil Rights Act. Gilbert, which held that pregnancy discrimination was not sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act, prompted the legislature [...]

The prior governance was to ensure that the directors of the companies and the shareholder directors had the upper hand in the management of the companies.

Adopted in a few states and recently introduced in the State of New York, the Hunger-Free Campus Bill seeks to promote food security among college students.

In conclusion, it should be noted that the 'stay-put' prohibits school authorities from excluding children with disabilities, and the mootness of the Education of the Handicapped Act is determined by age.

On the other hand, the duty of loyalty requires directors to act in the company's and its shareholders' best interests, not to put their interests ahead of the company's.

The duty of care principle is a central concept of the tort law, as it implies that one individual accepts the duty to guarantee safety and the absence of harm to another individual.

Since the introduction of the Land Registration Act, individuals who explicitly demonstrate the use of land for ten years are qualified to claim their right to possess the said land1.

The first type of offense features statements given under oath and it needs to be verified that the person made a false statement, was aware of it, and the topic of the statement was crucial [...]

Johnson & Johnson is an example of a recent legal dispute that involved informed consent, regulations, and the results of the dispute.

This essay will analyze the main features of the UK law and the differences and similarities between the British and the American law.

This article examines the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 in light of the child offense issue in the 21st century.

In addition, the law acts as a foundation of formal legality, a feature that provides security and predictability of dealings between individuals, the government, and members of different communities.

Granville's fundamental constitutional right to decide how to raise her daughters was not in any way protected by the court's assumption that it is typically in the children's best interests to spend time with the [...]

The real issue before us is whether we should replace the doctrine of joint and several liability with one in which the liability of codefendants to the plaintiff is apportioned according to each defendant's respective [...]

The topics covered in the article are related to the history of land tenure in Mexico. Furthermore, it is vital to adapt to the emerging situation in terms of protecting the farmers and land from [...]

In any case, this investigation will allow people to assess the picture of the situation within the framework of introducing the law that appeals to financial investments in the preschool system and assistance to parents.

While the case was being considered in the Queensland court, the state Parliament approved the Law on the Coastal Islands of the Torres Strait Islands.

Laws in digital media include the freedom of speech of the press contained in the bill of rights. Ethics in digital communication include the practice of checking bias and ensuring all sides of a story [...]

The doctrine is essential in antitrust law because it allows the government to hold a company liable for the actions of its employees.

Pro Arguments: The majority of Americans agree on the necessity to legalize marijuana. This initiative is accompanied by concerns regarding the actual use of marijuana.

At the same time, this information is applied to the legal and psychological perspective to understand the importance and relevance of the acquired information.

The presence of police officers on social networks in this way contributes to the solvability of criminal offenses in case the activity of criminals on social networks can be recorded.

In the UAE, defamation amounts to a criminal offense having both the offense and its sentence set under the Federal Decree Law 31 of 2021 as per the UAE Penal Code.

Yet, she is also unnerved that this definition is grounded in masculinity and does not apply to women, implying that the concept of the reasonable woman does not exist. Subsequently, I agree with Angel's idea [...]

The market-based approaches to environmental conservation in such countries as the US and the UK are designed to facilitate the mitigation of environmental damage3.

Social media companies' insufficient protection of users' personal information and adherence to terms or services negatively influences the population's safety by facilitating terrorist organizations' activities.

To preserve potentially disruptive data that must not be released to the public, the FOIA integrates several provisions that allow the officials to decline the request for information without suffering possible consequences.

In the case study of Tom, there is a necessity to incorporate the tort law due to the relative association of Tom's incidence as an injured party in the category of the licensee.

In search of equivalents in legal translation: A parametric approach to comparing legal terminology in Polish and Greek. The author of this focuses on comparing civil law terminology in Greek and Polish for legal translation.

Acts such as the Americans with Disabilities Act affect not only the political and legal environment in a country but also the rights and responsibilities of nurses.

I would like to appeal to the decision made by the Court that has concluded that a referral fee must be paid despite the lack of the necessary agreement.

According to the legend, the idea of the Act originated when the Congresswoman was interrupted by a loud TV commercial during the family dinner.

The fact that it was April and the slopes were supposed to be closed may lessen the degree of the company's responsibility in this particular case, but not completely. It was the actions of Mr.

The author of the article is a research scientist at the A&M University of Texas, hence, is credible. The primary purpose of the article is to discuss cemeteries on private property in Texas and provide [...]

Due to the fact that the forms are legal documents, the old people may need the help of a lawyer to fill the forms and understand all the detail of the directives.

The employment-at-will doctrine is the common law legislation act that regulates the United States employer-employee relationships. Public policy is one of the main exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

After analyzing the content on the web page related to police violence, I realized that there are more murders committed by police than I expected.

As such, it inherently debilitates the livelihood of those that may not have the same opportunities in ownership as those that are wealthier, from a family that owns property, or those that have received such [...]

When the probative value of previous sexual behavior of the victim significantly outweighs the possible harm for the victim, the victim's sexual history can serve as evidence for the trial.

While the right of a particular individual to hold beliefs that are in opposition to other groups is perfectly legal and accepted, the practice of denying service or discriminating against customers based on some aspects [...]

Her participation in the program will be an educational experience and put the juvenile offender in touch with professionals who can understand the motives of her behavior instead of giving Jane Doe an actual criminal [...]

After forty years and a trillion dollars, the volume of drugs in the United States has remained relatively the same. In 2000, Portugal decriminalized all hard and soft drugs at the recommendation of a panel [...]

The court decision in favor of the plaintiff, to whom the restaurant paid compensation for the damage caused, is often parodied in the movies.

California is a landmark case on the issue of search and seizures as stipulated in the Fourth Amendment. The officer is justified to search within the immediate control of the offender for safety reasons and [...]

Tort law cannot effectively redress injury both to the dignity and health of the majority of people who may be engaged in such attractions.

Wayfair, Inc.in which the prosecutor required out-of-state sellers to remit and also take the sales tax the same way as businesses with the same physical presence in the state.

It is upon this backdrop that this paper seeks to compare the reforms made by the new draft Defamation Bill which is intended to discourage libel tourism, with the current prevalent law on libel tourism [...]

The Applicant moved to extend the limitation period under the FLA statute and asked the Court to identify the exact date of separation.

The most significant resemblance of the New Laws of The Indies and Human Rights Law of the United Nations is the obligation to consider human rights as the primary basis for establishing the local regulations.

Both Pain and Youens must sign and date the covenant or a Schedule of Dilapidations. In this case, Youens and sub-tenants must bear the costs of repairs and maintenance.

As the existing federal legislation regarding online privacy is mostly pre-2000, the adoption of new state laws and their practical implementation can provide a benchmark for protecting the privacy of the United States citizens.

The tort system in itself requires that in the case that a party or an individual harms or causes harm to the other, it requires that the victim is to be compensated usually in terms [...]

The legal duty of care assigned to the defendant is one that emerges independently of contractual responsibility, and expressly, in the absence of a contract.

Online environment has been providing the platform for casual interactions as well as economic activities for quite a while.

Commonly known under the title of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), the regulation serves as the tool for improving the financial operations in companies.

One of the milestones in the development of the struggle of members of the LGBTQ + community for their rights in the United States is the adoption of the Defense of Marriage Act.

The best prevention of negligence is the professionalism of a person whose mistakes manifest the human factor or health problems and not deliberate relaxation and neglect of any action required by the situation.

As a result, the judge's decision has less influence on the development of civil law than the judgments of lawmakers and legal experts who write and analyze the codes.

Catharine Beecher's "An Appeal to American Women" is a discussion kind of piece that considers the power of women in office and how the issue should be approached.

The body of the essay will involve providing information on the nature of defamation laws in the USA and the UK, the implementation of such laws in the two countries, and the reason why the [...]

Providing the basis for legal standards that will be applied to managing legal and civil issues in the U.S.legal setting, the specified changes must focus on the needs of the population and contribute to the [...]

There are several aspects that point out the need for maintaining natural justice, procedural fairness, administrative rigor and strict adherence to established norms, regulations, procedures and practices in the arena of professional sports and the [...]

In this case, the duty of care has been breached by the presence of a piece of glass in the meal. The doctor is the defendant in this case and can claim defense of unintentional [...]

Rawls attempt to define and differentiate between the existing and non-existing market economy to that of the private property in the production sector.

A license to occupy has been suggested as used by property owners for the easier exercise of control over tenants and to further avoid swirling mists and high costs of solicitors.

But, taking into account the shares of Derek and Tim to the purchase and the decoration of the house, it is necessary to mention, that they are empowered to claim the compensation of the losses [...]

In fact, a customer that hires an accountant to carry out an audit is no more responsible for verifying the data that will be included in the final report as this duty is naturally transposed [...]

The case of Amina and other women, which appeared in the news among other cases of battered women in Morocco, constitute the discourse of the case study in the context of domestic abuse and the [...]

It uses the attitudes of the officers to CP to define the success of the change and the barriers that prevent CP adoption.

With reference to the above given question, this paper will analyze the current legal system and discuss three areas of civil law that I would change and also three areas of civil law that I [...]

In this, it was found that the methods used looked at the income approach which compares the sale to the cost of the purchase.

Whenever there is a contract of the sale of a good in a deliverable state, the property of the good passes to the buyer when the contract is made.

After further inquisitives, the Supreme Court realized that the need for the second appeal by the plaintiff was of no need.

There are three categories of a common mistakes: A contract is deemed invalid in Ireland in case the parties to the contract enter into the binding agreements of purchasing goods that are actually owned by [...]

Dawn's statement that "Super Cam Causes Crashes!" is admissible under federal law and can be presented as evidence in court if he is able to prove that it is true.

The rules of statutory interpretations are sometimes referred to as 'cannons of construction' and they include the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule. After this, the court must interpret the statute in [...]

Generally, the evaluation of facts shows that researches may benefit from such studies by means of actualizing their knowledge regarding the specific points of legal analysis such as studying the parties of the case, finding [...]

In the case of the tort reforms, the idea is to reduce the charges on malpractice insurance in order to make the medicine field significantly lucrative.

The duty of care is determined through the evaluation of whether the defendant has an obligation not to conduct himself/herself in a manner that can be injurious to the plaintiff under all circumstances considered in [...]

This is owed to the fact that Christie lacks the necessary documentation that she could present to the court to support her claim that she was rightly paying the $175.

From the studies and cases observed during the course sessions regarding the sport's law, it is evident that the utilization of domestic disciplinary tribunals is increasing due to their significance in the sport's realms.

The last element is that of causation: the claimant must show that the breach resulted in damage, and the damage is connected to the breach.

Contracts are agreements between two (or more) parties, accepted voluntarily and leading to legal consequences if the prescribed conditions are not met.

One of the key issues in the legal field is the distinction between the concepts of contracts and agreements. These two concepts are extremely interrelated in legal terms.

In civil and other legal literature, the categories of contract and agreement are considered to be synonymous. However, there are a number of differences between the two concepts.

Thus, it is important to device a method of investigation that may enhance the preservation and maintenance of the integrity of the evidence.

A contract must be valid to be upheld in a court of law; the validity of a contract is determined on the basis of five elements that have been outlined above.