Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 5

Aileen Wuornos began her series of murders in 1989. For a short period, she killed seven people, and all of them were men.

The Sherman Act is a part of Antitrust Act. The Act offers criminal sanctions on individuals who undertake contracts or engage in any forms of conspiracy in restraint of commerce.

However, the court upheld that in line with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, the security agents had to prove that they had a legitimate lead making them believe that the particular vehicle had contraband [...]

According to Cote the process refers to "the methodical quest of knowledge that involves the identification and setting up of the problem, the collection of data via observation and experiment as well as the formulation [...]

It is important to explain that this company was established to offer oil exploration and drilling services but it later expanded its operations to include supplying materials and equipment for other oil companies.

Though these guidelines are available and are supposed to be the guide for the justice system, there have been cases when there have been a miscarriage of justice, which has led to the conviction of [...]

The decision by the court held that the bank manager and the commercial bank were aware of the special disadvantage of the Amadios and made no substantive efforts to ensure that Amadio clearly understood the [...]

A microscope is a crucial tool for accurate identification of tool marks. Knowledge on manufacturing methods of tools is essential for a scientist to distinguish between distinctive marks and general marks.b) Dry, Dusty Shoe c) [...]

Conflicts between the two states around the port of New York retarded the development of the port especially the usage and ownership of the habor facilities along river Hudson.

Proponents of the no-fault medical scheme also argue that this system provides a chance for proper investigations of the real cause of medical injuries, without employing defensiveness common under the tort system.

The main objective is to ensure that the perpetrator is apprehended and convicted for the crime committed. This paper gives an overview of criminal profiling that includes types of profiling done in the United States [...]

Under common law, the definition of hire purchase is to the effect that the buyer hires the goods for a price with an option of purchasing the goods or terminating the agreement.

Thus, net widening can be a rather problematic phenomenon as more and more people are placed under the control of the justice system.

Therefore, the main purpose of this project is to explore the types of dilemmas and the factors that affect the workers response to the dilemmas in a workplace.

The response of the international community to the mass destruction of cultural property in the Middle East was immediate, and many governments referred to the goals and principles of the 1954 Hague Convention as well [...]

However, Frigaliment Importing Corporation was dissatisfied, arguing that the chicken received from the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the contract, citing that the term "chicken" was only used to mean "young chicken".

It is obvious that what has occurred can be defined as the breach of the patient's confidentiality and the violation of the patient's civil rights.

In the movie, the main cause of criminal activities is corruption and drug trafficking. The other cause of crime in the area is the widespread trafficking and use of drugs in the area.

A good case brief should show clear case facts that include the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant as well as the incident that led to the case. A brief of a case should [...]

This is because most of the time those in supervisory levels in the various workplaces do not know how to effectively communicate with their employees, intending to encourage them to work to reach the goals [...]

The Court of Appeal followed the persuasive precedent R v Howe and rejected the defense as inapplicable in cases of murder or attempted murder.

However, most of the firms prefer to do so through the Stock Exchange and 'Alternative Investment Market.' Upon registration as a public limited company, the company is required to adjust its memorandum to indicate that [...]

Police on the other hand think the high crime rates of Blacks and Hispanics only reflects the differences in the crime rates and not the biased justice system.

The essay is a critical analysis of when a shape qualifies to be registered as a trademark under the Trade Marks Act 1994.

Some of the factors that contribute to the decision-making of the offender are based on time constraints, the ability of the information available, agreeing with the offender's plans as well as the availability of favorable [...]

The paper starts with the details of the case, including the factual and procedural background thereof, proceeds to the judgment summary of the case and the analysis of the questions that the court ruling have [...]

This is one of the provisions that force the company to take responsibility for the damage or loss of the goods.

Chem who is a new customer to the business entered into a contract with Barkley on the belief that he is in the position of authority.

Although the meaning of being delinquent leads us to think in diversified ways, the high degree of consistency in the association between delinquency and other characteristics of our society not only sustains the conclusion that [...]

The purpose of my research is to highlight some of the uses of the internet in solving crime. The Internet can be used to carry out crime mapping, this is a strategy used by law [...]

Considering the murders of people by Theodore Bundy, the problem may be discussed from biological and psychological perspectives as all murders may be characterized by the "trait theory", which is going to be characterized by [...]

The police is the guardian of society and should uphold the rights of people. It is necessary to reorganize the outdated structure of the police department by retraining or replacing officers.

In order to theorize on the motivation of serial killers, it is obligatory to define the scope of the study. Practically, the most persistent barrier to the utter understanding of the motivation of a serial [...]

1 Contextualism, on the other hand, is the approach that places the highest value on the interpretation of a text for the purpose of finding its objective meaning viewing it in the circumstances in which [...]

There are those activities that are universally accepted to constitute a crime, however, what might be considered the crime in one society is not necessarily applied in a different society; for instance, looking at a [...]

Out of this need, several regulations have been put in place to ensure children's safety in vehicles is guaranteed; thus, protection from second-hand smoke is an obvious measure that is directed towards the overall safety [...]

It is analogous to an attempt to extinguish the flames of a fire fed by an open gas jet: the flames are the major problem, but the cause is the gas. The degree of acceptability [...]

The standard process of constitutional amendment is as follows: the amendment must be accepted in equal periods by both houses of Parliament, they must be either accepted by a simple mainstream in a referendum, or [...]

The statistics suggest that the present rate of school violence is, in fact, lower than the one estimated by the general studies.

This was a case in concern of the basic and statutory responsibilities relating to the Bank which was to be a relation to the collapse of the BCCI in 1991.

This means that corporate crime poses a threat to the community at large in which their actions and impact on personal injury and cause economic and physical impacts.

The power dynamics between the two genders and the observable differences in male and female behavior shape their crime patterns, avenues into the justice system, and responses to incarceration.

In fact, I suppose labor agreement to be the most important for the case as the rules of conduct are formulated in it.

In the television shows and films examined in this paper, the creators attempt to display various aspects of the criminal justice system realistically and positively.

The decision of the House of Lords is completely based on the letter of the law. Therefore, fiduciary-based duties of a director towards their company include the requirement that the director should act in the [...]

It is a general rule that when an offer is made as was done by B supermarkets, the contract becomes binding the moment an acceptance is made by the offeree.

The main aim of the United States social health care policy is to improve the welfare of Americans in terms of enhancing social security, housing, and education and health care services.

Therefore, it is required to review the theory of natural law and rights to consider its application in the field of healthcare and draw a specific conclusion as to whether the norms of this theory [...]

However, this approach is beneficial for reducing crime rates in the short run and does no contribute to solving the gang problem in the long run due to the existence of heavy stereotypes in the [...]

The inferences he made about the witness stand and the role of women in the courts were purely influenced by research findings from his experiments.

Victimology is a science that dedicates itself to the study of the connection between the victim and the offender. The police use victimology in order to discover a correlation between the victims and the offenders, [...]

The criminological basis of the conflict theory is contingent on the limitations of the social order and the inequalities that are inherent in the ideological perceptions of the society.

If we connect the theory of relative deprivation to the stratified society and criminology, we will see that the majority of social movements are based on the phenomenon of relative deprivation.

The fact that he was put under his mother's care is rather surprising because she failed to take care of him as he was a child and suffered from a mental disease.

10 As deduced from the definition of the sovereignty of the parliament, it is clear that the lack of the codified constitution in the U.K.has given the emphasis on the doctrine of the parliamentary supremacy.

To identify the worth of the expansion of the DIFC Courts' jurisdiction, the essence of the chosen court system, its peculiar features, and the positive and negative aspects of the process have to be considered [...]

On the contrary, a man can think of committing a misdemeanor, a petty crime or even a felony in the attempts to lend someone a helping hand and improve the conflicting situation.

One of the most important components of the criminal justice system is a code of ethics, which governs the behavior and conduct of professionals working within the system.

In this context, wrongful convictions subvert the purpose for which the judicial system is established in the US. In this sense, convictions ensure that the judicial system does justice not only to the victim but [...]

Overall, the appeals court affirmed the district's court ruling that the perceived disparate impact on female candidates for failing the fitness test run could not be ruled as a discriminatory employee selection practice but as [...]

One of the institutions that have been tremendously affected by the 'CSI effect' is the jury. Based on these facts, it is clear that the credibility and competence of the jury is threatened by the [...]

On the other hand, accretion refers to the addition of transferred employees to an existing bargaining unit due to changes in the operations or structure of an organization.

This paper critically explains why the inclusion of duties and responsibilities in an employee's employment contract is fundamental to a productive relationship between the employer and the employee.

Since the very existence of the society is based on compliance with a specific set of regulations, breaking the law must never be regarded as a permissible action; however, the ethical implications that a certain [...]

The laws of the land define boundaries in which public administrators offer guidance, as well as the roles of the citizens in the decision making process.

The furniture and fixtures that can be found in the possession of the company dealing with the production and supply of pizza include tables, shelves and benches for customers to sit on while waiting to [...]

The article gives a detailed account of the case and the outcome of Hernando Washington's trial. Lisa McIntyre does not attempt to justify the actions of Hernando Washington; instead she is more concerned with the [...]

9 It is to be well understood that the declaration of the presence of native land rights in the land in Australia in no way acted to oust the proprietary rights of the non-indigenous groups.

Copyright infringement refers to the act of using copyrighted works without the authority of the owner thus infringing their rights to reproduce or distribute the material.

A team of highly skilled people is charged with the responsibility of drafting statutes on behalf of the legislature before they can be passed to the courts for interpretation. There are several advantages that may [...]

The right to privacy may be contained in codes and guidelines that guide the use of personal information at the workplace. Employers have the role of monitoring employees to allow their organizations to run effectively.

In review of the Case involving Drive Yourself Company and the minor, it is evident that the company acted on negligence when making the recruitment of the new driver.

In the first case, the use of a shotgun by the young woman to kill one of the two men who had previously raped her is not justified as a necessary use of weapon in [...]

Nevertheless, such a claim is questionable because it is the same constitution that has a bill of rights indicating that it is the right of every citizen to be protected and to live.

The major contention in this case was the National Industrial Recovery Act where the US Congress gave authority to the President of the United States to prohibit the transportation of petroleum within and outside the [...]

The children/teenagers who are sentenced by the juvenile court are not termed as guilty but as delinquent children However, the juvenile courts have the responsibility of handing over the children/teenagers to the adult court whenever [...]

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, companies that are publicly traded in the US are required to increase their internal financial and accounting controls after personal clarification with the chief executive and chief financial officers [...]

However, this does not negate the fact that bribery is a violation of a legal and ethical principle in the society.

Its relationship with other types of leaves such as vacation, maternity and paternity leaves is also discussed Conclusion FMLA has greatly assisted employees to balance their work roles with other family or personal needs Prior [...]

Officially titled the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act remains a key piece of labor legislation in the United States.

Officers in such a culture are educated on how to see the warning indications of domestic abuse, are encouraged to sympathize with victims, and are expected to take swift action to stop the violence.

In this video, 14 people who have experienced violent crime recount the incidents in which they or a loved one were harmed as well as the physical, mental, and financial effects of the crime and [...]

As a technician, it is crucial to understand the Montreal Protocol and the implications it has on the automotive industry. As a technician, it is essential to understand the implications of the Protocol and to [...]

The duty of care principle is a central concept of the tort law, as it implies that one individual accepts the duty to guarantee safety and the absence of harm to another individual.

Therefore, this story of Noah becomes the tale of resilience and self-preservation in the face of competing demands and adverse factors.

The core of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the widespread use of surveillance cameras and the potential reduction in the frequency of violent acts by law enforcement.

It happened because of the huge differences between how the state viewed the law enforcement agent's actions and how the defense tried to protect the plaintiff.

That is, one should take into account the context, namely the reasons why one decided on such a job and how it will be implemented.

This personal approach is similar to the environmental criminology theories that analyze an individual and develop solutions based on that analysis.

Therefore, for students' best interests, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act was enacted into law giving parents and students a right to access students' education records, a right of seeking the amendment of inaccurate [...]

First of all, it is essential to consider the manner in which Diana accepted the offer. According to professionals, "acceptance of the offer must be in the prescribed manner that is demanded by the offeror".

The purpose of trust and equity law is essential to fill in the gaps left by property law whenever a court determines that it would be equitable for one person to receive the financial benefits [...]

As a result of this case, Lenz's complaint was satisfied, and the court stated that companies must consider fair use requirements.

In the three-tier court system, there are the trial courts, the first appellate courts, and the U.S. Thus, the three-tier court system consists of a regional court, an appellate court, and a supreme court.

The Court decided that there were objective markers of society's new preferences and standards, such as the fact that only a minority of the US States permitted the death penalty for the mentally retarded. Moreover, [...]

Williams became the main suspect of the young girls' abduction after a young boy confessed to have seen him at the YMCA packing his car a large bundle of clothes with "skinny and white legs" [...]

Policing became a legitimate practice in the eyes of the public. The focus of Peelian principles is on preventing crime and not necessarily catching criminals in the act.

The first aspect, the impact of hospital employees on the legal aspect of practices and the adoption of new measures as per the current needs, is reflected by the inclusion in the operations of healthcare [...]

In 1934, a new building was erected on the island, cause of the transfer of Alcatraz to the U.S.federal system. Guantanamo was established in 2002 on the grounds of a U.S.military base.

This paper aims at discussing the evolution, relationship to criminal activities, and the effects of the gang's illegal activities on the communities in which they operate, among other activities of the Latin Kings.

In as much as some human rights activists often complain of the violation of the rights by the justice system, India's criminal system has faced significant changes since colonial times to the present.

Drugs have been the major cause of the rise in the levels of corruption, disobedience to the law, and human rights abuses The selection highlights the key challenge of drug cartels in Latin America.

The BOARD OF CONTROL OF FLORIDA, A body corporate, No.643. The case began in April 1948 The plaintiff was a black student who had applied to be admitted to the University of Florida's College of [...]

The case scenario is covered under section 2 of the UCC, which involves the sale of goods. Under section 2-204, the conduct of the agreeing parties can point to a contract.

However, one of these judges, William Marbury, wanted to ask the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus, a mandate, meaning that something that happened in case of his appointment would not be delivered [...]

With the number of content creators, companies, and independent artists on the platform, as well as the inclusion of the ability to monetize problems of Fair use and Copyright have begun to emerge on the [...]

The strict logic of the era of classicism, presented in the works of Cesare Beccaria, speaks of the full responsibility of a person for his misdeeds.

Mechelle Vinson, a defendant and a former employee of the plaintiff bank, filed a lawsuit against the bank and its bank manager Sidney Taylor. Sidney Taylor was the vice president of the bank and the [...]

Speaking of early biological theories, many of them assumed that crimes were caused because of the forces that were beyond the individuals' control.

The aim of the UK is to balance the levels of greenhouse gases to circumvent the perilous issue of climate change, as well as make it probable for people to acclimatize to an inevitable climate [...]

The second issue is that the deletion to the organization's records may be termed as the destruction of evidence. In conclusion, the destruction or retention of health records may expose the facility to significant legal [...]

Medical errors are some of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the US, which underscores the importance of the medical liability system in the country.

The National Small Business Act 102 of 1996 addresses the lack of resources in South Africa It was amended in 2003 and 2004 to offer more support to businesses The 2003 amendment was meant [...]

A significant role in the emergence and development of the theory of the U.S. contract law belongs to the American jurists Langdell and Holmes.

In legal terms, the key difference between the two was that the Africans from Amistad were freeborn and enslaved in violation of the international agreements, while Dred Scott, despite his sojourn in Illinois, was born [...]

The bureaucracy and lack of flexibility pose quite significant threats to the success of the UK anti-trafficking strategies. An illustration of this lack of flexibility and focus is the case of the Subatkis brothers.

Besides, these theories correlate with one of the latest versions, according to which the murder of JFK was a conspiracy of the CIA and mafia members, including Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald.

This paper will criticise the police recruitment process and the criteria used in the selection of police officers, particularly the use of background investigation to determine a participant's integrity and personality testing using psychological tests, [...]

Many people from low socio-economic backgrounds are tempted to engage in crime because they lack required skills and qualifications to get them employed. In conclusion, there are many factors which motivate people to commit crimes.

Similarly, it sought to investigate the ethical instruments of risk assessment that are instrumental in determination of treatment of juvenile offenders.