Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 2

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

When two parties sign a contract, they are to fulfill their part of the bargain, if that is not possible, then we declare a breach of contract, in which case there are procedures to be [...]

Criminal profiling refers to the technique of observing and analyzing the behavioral patterns of a crime so as to assist the investigators come up with a descriptive template of the offender.

The hunt for the snipers who threatened the residents of Washington, D.C.was another famous example of law enforcers exploiting the capabilities of geographical mapping to connect thirteen different hits that took place in a span [...]

1954 Sheridan Holmes was born SH; 1957 Ryan Williams, former Behman Brothers manager, was born RW; 1974 Fran Ashcott started working as an English Professor at Bartroom College FA; 1976 Mickey Pennman became a [...]

Before moving into the aspects of measurement of actions of juvenile delinquents, it is necessary to define and know what a juvenile delinquent is, and what actions fall within the ambit of juvenile delinquency.

In order to theorize on the motivation of serial killers, it is obligatory to define the scope of the study. Practically, the most persistent barrier to the utter understanding of the motivation of a serial [...]

Judges listen to allegations brought by the prosecutors, the attorney defenders, and the testimony of the witnesses and rule whether the evidence is valid or not.

In the case of Gramsci, the Court ruled that it was appropriate to pierce the corporate veil of Stepanovs so that Gramsci could enforce terms of the agreement under the contract.

According to Al-Shafi'i's "four-source" theory of law, the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet are the primary sources whereas the Qiyas and the Ijma are the secondary sources of Islamic law.

For the case of murder or crimes that necessitate capital punishment, the incentive to commit murder is directly related to the uncertainties that punishments for the crime will generate.

There is need to highlight the social cultural factors of crime and describe the necessary positive measures to prevent the occurrences of crime.

In the case of Cordero's autobiography, the book captures the emotional journey of a father who overcame the challenges imposed by the legal system to fight for his right to be with his son.

The feeling of dehumanization in the prisons is also contributed by overcrowding, strip searches, and degradation of the prisoners by the prison officers.

In addition, pure RCT may be insufficient for explaining nuances associated with the psychological and social profiles of the offenders. In particular, the traditional RCT faces problems explaining violent crime and irrational risk and reward [...]

For instance, on the Internet, it is much easier to bully and harass people with impunity due to the distance that separates the offender and victim.

One of the key causes of overcrowding is the continuing growth in the population of criminals sent to jail. The people have had to wait for their trial turn, and the only place to wait [...]

In the case of Jeannette M, the conclusion is that the receptionists at the patient's physician's office is responsible for the fact that medical care had not been provided to Jeannette on time, which inadvertently [...]

Therefore, the audience can learn that the overall evaluation Archer is making implicates the need to value all people in society and to live morally.

However, the court upheld that in line with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, the security agents had to prove that they had a legitimate lead making them believe that the particular vehicle had contraband [...]

This is for example the agreement between the author of a book and the publisher. This paper is going to look at the issue of copyright agreement and the various challenges and limitations that copyright [...]

A legal concurring opinion which is written by judges shows the support given by court's majority though in a manner that is quite different.

Even though the defendant promised a reward for the information, the court held that no contract was formed as "the offer of the reward had not been communicated to the claimant prior to his giving [...]

At this stage, a child can perform certain actions repeatedly and also be able to differentiate the means of doing actions.

The present paper studies the unsolved mystery that is the case of Jonathan Luna, a US federal prosecutor who was found stabbed to death in Brecknock Township stream in 2003. The murder of Jonathan Luna [...]

The investigator has to deal with the charred debris, the smoke, and the stench. It is important for the personnel to be trained and experienced in fire investigations.

There is no obligation for Google to restore the rank of Search King to previous levels or including the website in its search engine.

Hansard is the title that is commonly understood by many in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth countries to refer to transcripts of the debates of the parliament.

Since the law must be obeyed, it becomes enforceable and that is why institutions such as the police and the judiciary have a duty of enforcing the law.

The owner of the copyright in spite of the absence of necessity to provide the copyright notice on the work is the only person who can determine the ways of possible usage of the work.

These factors affect the behavior of an individual and might lead them to criminal activities depending on the effect of the overall combination of the elements mentioned above.

The essential facts supporting Lambert's position were the execution of the transfer of documents that required his review. Lambert talked about his obligations, the timing of the services, and their cost, which may confirm the [...]

While there are numerous types of questions, Bachman and Schutt elaborate on open-ended and close-ended questions. Open-ended and close-ended questions are often used during investigative interviewing to gather the needed information.

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

Although the plaintiffs filed an opposing memorandum, the court agreed with the NCAA's first motion to dismiss the case but left room for the amendment of the complaint.

The prerequisites of actus reus vary based on the crime definition and rely on place, individual, victim's state of mind, preparation, time, and consent.

The issues that surrounded the execution of the secret trusts, which later became a codicil, changed the norms in the secret trust to split into two, viz.fully secret trust and the half-secret trust.

The Affordable care Act, passed in 2010, intended to make healthcare a right for all workers in medium and large organizations.

The objective of the essay is to explore the pros of racial profiling and offer argumentative support on the same. From a proponent perspective and as a strong supporter of racial profiling, I am of [...]

The rapid expansion and rehabilitation of the prison facilities have enabled the prison to increase the number of inmates in the prison.

The agreement by the acceptor to be bound by the terms of the proposal creates a legally binding contract. There was no valid communication of the acceptance up to the stipulated time.

The reason behind this is that the owners of the business would pass the cost of labor to the consumers. Generally, bargaining power in the public sector is higher compared to that in the private [...]

Intellectual property as mentioned earlier is a personal property in the sense that it is mobile and not fixed to a particular land. While most of the personal properties are acquired through other means, intellectual [...]

Although one of the mandates of the NYPD includes preventing crime from occurring by deploying legal means, this paper questions the legal and ethical foundation of the 'stop and frisk' law applied by the NYPD. [...]

Criminal law is the kind of law that is used in the English legal system to punish those who act in a way that is against the interest of the society as laid down through [...]

A meta-analysis of 14 studies on women violence done by Honkatukia also found no substantial evidence linking the feminist and liberation movements to a rise in the share of violent offending and homicide perpetrated by [...]

A wound as organic trace evidence is used as one of the first clues about the crime of which when cleaned and examined through, the morgue vivid information will be obtained by the medical examiner.

This lockdown was effected following two particularly destructive prison riots; the first in 1973 in which most of the prison succumbed to flame, and the second in 1985, where most of the prison staff was [...]

Many of the people who are not in favor of such an act believe that hanging a person till death is not the only solution, so I say question them "what could be the other [...]

This makes the US constitution the oldest in the world, where 159 countries of the world had a constitution by the end of the 20th century.

It is clear, however, that the contract involves the sale of both the cabin and the land the written terms explicitly indicate this fact.

The case was examined in the Court of Appeals in the city of Manchester in 1979. Lord Diplock was the representative of the Manchester City Council under the leadership of the Conservative Party.Mr.

That is why the comparison of the Russian and American justice systems could help to improve the comprehending of the way the law functions in different states.

The protection of minority shareholders is crucial, especially in situations where they are unable to control the decisions of a company through voting.

The advocates of the law had for the previous century dreams of implementing a law that would oversee the reduction of crime and the elevation of sanity and morality crashed when they realized that the [...]

In turn, the Addams' case is also contradictive as the doctor prescribed the medications and it led to the death of the patient.

To practice hypnotism in the state of New York, the practitioner does not require a license of a behavioral health professional, but they are required to the proper use of terminology.

The early theorists of natural law were of the view that natural law is the command of God and it was to be obeyed even in instances when its obedience caused injustice.

Over the centuries, the society has taken steps to respond to this vice that threatens the moral fabric of the society. Becker sought to discover the consequences that the application of the label of deviant [...]

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

The goals of tactical analysis are to recognize crime trends and to develop the best suited strategies to address them. This is a matter of great concern and the department would inquire more into the [...]

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

For instance, if the ship-owner was to inspect the goods on behalf of the charterer, and a third party is involved at the port, then the rights and duties are imposed on them.

The teacher took the two learners to the school's administrator, who used the teacher's report to search T.L.O.'s purse. The school head finds drugs in the purse, after which the school contacts her mother, who [...]

I request the court acknowledge that the conflict between Sarah Celeb and the magazine Star Weekly that published information from her diary stolen without her permission violates Plaintiff's privacy rights by posting the information from [...]

To begin with, it is necessary to outline the primary purpose of the MOU agreement for both the health agencies and pharmacies in order to define whether the procedure itself has any benefit for the [...]

By defining the key characteristics of a criminal, one will be able to identify the possible suspects and, therefore, locate the perpetrator faster.

The criminal cases described in the documentaries present vexing evidence of a miscarriage of justice that persists in all levels of the conviction process, most notably law enforcement and the judiciary.

The former decides to sue Johnny for breach of contract on the two commitments, buying the car and the $10,000 offer.

The doctrine of equitable estoppel acts as a rule of evidence where matters in contention can be proved by demonstrating to the court how the rule applies in the circumstances of the case.

Though these guidelines are available and are supposed to be the guide for the justice system, there have been cases when there have been a miscarriage of justice, which has led to the conviction of [...]

Theories that explain the occurrence of crime in society have been developed to shed light on the increasing cases of criminal behavior. According to Agnew, crime is the outcome of the difficulties that an individual [...]

It is made up of programs and ideals which are effective in treatment of the offender, reintegrating them in the society and limiting them from committing similar offenses. In conclusion, though most prevention programs are [...]

The frustration-aggression theory shows that a human inability to achieve a goal, the necessity to block feelings, emotions, and needs, and live with frustration and dissatisfaction may cause violence and inappropriate behavior; the case of [...]

From 1970s, legislators passed laws to increase the severity and certainty of punishment as a result of the conservative views on crime.

Alanoud will most likely not prevail in a court of law due to the fact that she is not in agreement with Modern Furniture Inc.to deliver the product.

The relationship between crime and the media is especially interesting, as the two have been deeply interconnected since the inception of the latter.

If hunting is the primary means of survival of a particular society, the euthanasia of the elderly and the sick can be deemed acceptable.

The avoidance of legal liability while using social media in the UAE involves abiding by the stipulations of the aforementioned laws and regulations.

Some of the illegal leisure activities within our present-day world comprise engaging in pornography, excessive consumption of alcohol and smoking. The third illegal leisure activity is the smoking of cigarettes and engaging in drug abuse.

The book "Criminology: the Core" by Larry Siegel is the authors investigation of the problems connected with committing the crime and, which is most important, the theoretical aspects of committing a crime.

In conclusion, if the employers are unable to keep guns out of the workplace, then the situation can worsen having seen the trend and incidences of homicides at the workplace as a result of gun [...]

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the State Supreme Court's decision to distinguish the validity of consent to search with and without the presence of another co-inhabitant.

Despite the need to uphold the principle of the open justice, some courts are held in camera, that is, they are not open to the public.

After reading the article, it is notable that there are awesome highlights explaining the history, development, and evolution of crime in the society.

Putting Farmer in a prison dominated by men without considering her sexual nature and appearance was a clear indication of their negligence of the harm that would befall Farmer.

In all states of the United States, it is illegal to drive under the influence of alcohol beyond the set limit per state, according the countries legal definition, drunk driving is driving when one has [...]

The paper will examine the background of the case in addition to the legal point at issue and the decision of the court.

In the end, it was an electrician who identified the typical signs of abuse in Daniel that finally led police to investigate, thereby exposing the weakness and ineffectiveness of the Dual Track System; the child [...]

Michael Vick's case displayed just how long the legal system had take long to act on high-profile persons as it would to the rest of the population.

The essay demonstrates an understanding of deviance and crime and their association. From this point of view, the societal response to deviant conduct in the modern-day world is featured by the predominance of correlations and [...]

Modern scholars have been interested in a wide range of attributes that have the potential to influence their behaviors, such as the chemicals found in the brain and neurotransmitters.

The Supreme Court inquired in the case whether Kent had a say in the juvenile court's investigation to waive jurisdiction and if it adhered to the right to due process.

Before a patient agrees to treatment, the doctor must explain the risks, benefits, and alternatives. Thirdly, the patient must be given ample time to weigh the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment.

The principle of this case is that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. The NSA's surveillance capabilities do not violate the Fourth Amendment because they are not searches or seizures.

He was accused of breaking the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1974 and money laundering by the U.S.attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.

As a result, unsolved cases usually remain unaddressed, which is partially the causality of the lack of tools that could potentially connect the circumstances, victims, and patterns. Technological advancements and innovative cooperation are two of [...]

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

With the support of various friends, the plaintiff was able to raise enough money to buy the Harrier Plane and mailed a form to the respondent demanding the plane.

The characters in the story are the peasant Khun-Anup, the vassal of the high steward, Nemtynakht, the high steward Rensi, and King Nebkaure.

Williams became the main suspect of the young girls' abduction after a young boy confessed to have seen him at the YMCA packing his car a large bundle of clothes with "skinny and white legs" [...]

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

During the specific day that the trial took place, Montresor, the defendant, entered the courtroom for the verdict to be read.

It is essential to examine the border between safe and dangerous labor and compare arguments for and against the prohibition of all forms of child labor in manufacturing.

The clinical laboratory operations within a given country are driven by a set of ethical conduct, which the researchers and laboratory technicians are expected to observe. In managing the laboratory activities, there is a need [...]

In particular, comparative criminology was formed, the main purpose of which is to consider and study the similarities and differences in crimes of different countries and cultures.

This paper argues that trying juveniles in the same manner as adults is not a deterrent to criminal activities as it might harden the hearts of the children so convicted.

The film chronicles the details of proceedings of the trial of the young African-American. The boy gets arrested and is taken to the scene of crime for questioning by the detectives.

Speeding affects the health and the economy of the country, hence people should learn to drive safely. Speeding mainly affects the economy of the country and the health of the individuals involved in motorist crashes.

The final duty of the Intake officer is to determine whether it would be safe to release the juvenile or not.

However, in the case in point, the expenses were incurred due to the unwillingness of the taxpayer to comply with the existing legal regulations out of personal considerations; as a result, the court ruled that [...]

However, Frigaliment Importing Corporation was dissatisfied, arguing that the chicken received from the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the contract, citing that the term "chicken" was only used to mean "young chicken".

In reality, based on the ghastly consequences of his actions and "teachings", he is generally considered a pathological liar, a shrewd manipulator and a man guilty of not only coercing others to murder in his [...]

The rights to property and land in the Muslim world are affected not only by internal structure of the society but also by external forces which take the form of human rights organizations and development [...]

Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed [...]

Here, it is affirmed that when a contract contains a statement that prevents inquiry into a promise or statement or act that can be a representation of the terms of a contract before enactment of [...]

Additionally, it has been hoped that private international law is the best means to alleviate complex issues in disputes such as those involving the use of the Internet.

MacCormick states that to understand a case law is the same as understanding how that particular decision by particular judges about particular parties to particular cases can be used in making of the general rule [...]

In this case the old contract is discharged and there is a substitution of anew contract By vicarious performance: It is open to the parties to have their contract performed vicariously by another person, provided [...]

Considering the murders of people by Theodore Bundy, the problem may be discussed from biological and psychological perspectives as all murders may be characterized by the "trait theory", which is going to be characterized by [...]