A key question that many would want to be answered is which of the two superior to the other. Essentially, this approach is much more superior when it comes to the deterrence of criminals.
The term preponderance of the evidence means that the side that would provide greater evidence concerning the case would lead either the judge or the jury to take one side as opposed to the other.
The report explores the UAE labor laws and compares them with the ILO standards and recommendations to showcase the need for legislative changes in the current UAE labor laws.
The organization decides on the number of hours the employees are supposed to work on a daily basis and allows them to attend to their duties at their most appropriate time.
The congress of the United States has a responsibility of enacting the 'Employee Free Choice Act which would greatly solve the problems experienced in the US labor laws that have limited the ability of employees [...]
The increased taxes on alcoholic beverages discouraged the consumption of alcohol, as a way of promoting the health of the citizens.
The case between the people and the king of pop, Michael Jackson, elicited two main ethical concerns: the passion of the prosecutor to convict the defendant and the possibility of the prosecutor to be an [...]
If Chris decides to move the funds from the customer to finance the deficit in the ledger, then it is also an example of a white-collar crime.
In regard to the relationship between the effect of various factors involved in a child's upbringing and the likelihood of becoming a criminal during adulthood, varied findings were made.
It is evident that the evolution of standards that the court has adopted to evaluate the freedom of expression leaves a lot to be desired. The court has attempted to define the role of the [...]
S 643 in which the court held that evidence obtained in contravention of the Fourth Amendment was not admissible in court.
Instances that indicate preference of arbitration by the government is the enacting of the Interstate act in 1887 and also the passing of Federal Arbitration Act in 1925 and finally the passing of Civil Rights [...]
This report will focus on crime in Virginia in terms of the nature and trends of crime in the state. According to a report by FBI, the rate of violent crime in Virginia and the [...]
To corroborate scientific, circumstantial and witness evidences, the prosecution needs to examine financial transactions of Roberts to prove that he was truly trafficking dangerous drugs according to the third count of charges.
The decision in the recent case of the City of Ontario, California v. The decision by the court puts the issue regarding the right to privacy applicable to individuals in question.
The principle of judicial activism can violate the principle of separation of powers since it has been interpreted as legislation from the bench which amounts to judicial tyranny or judicial dictatorship.
The decision to convict the accused was reversed by the court on the ground that his speech was protected under the First Amendment.
More so, continued empowerment of victims to participate in sentencing process as evidenced from views and observations of many of judges and attorneys is that, it erodes and restricts the ability to try cases and [...]
To determine whether Teto is liable to Retro Ltd and whether Teto is entitled to any remedies for the small orders in the first months requires an examination of the terms of the parties' contract, [...]
Standing, or locus standi, is a law jargon which means the ability of a party to show to the court that it has enough relations to and injury from the law or action challenged to [...]
Some of the factors specified in the agreement include the amount of pay or salary, the date of payment of the salary, the avenue of payment and any commissions or bonuses offered to the employee [...]
The above discussed theory of punishment is applied by various administrations to prevent or minimize similar crimes thereby restoring balance in the society.
The Australian justice structure is centered on an elementary belief in the canon of law, justice and the autonomy of the judges.
Intellectual property is treated as information and, therefore, the intellectual property assets can be attributed to the characteristics of public goods. Owners of personal, intellectual and real property are not subjected to the same rights [...]
Legal frameworks on the training of security personnel set the minimum qualifications for persons who are deemed fit to serve in the security firms together with training requirements, licensing requirements, and even qualifications for tutors [...]
Thus, the research on the role of the integrated intellectual property strategies and the effectiveness of specific intellectual property modules for the development of the technology firms is necessary to study the problem in detail.
This case was concerned with the incident of a police officer deciding to search the bag of one of the passengers that was travelling on the bus, despite the fact that the law enforcement representative [...]
As in all contract cases the validity of a contract is one of the essential legal principles that must first be established since a court of law cannot enforce the terms of an invalid contract, [...]
In my opinion, Andrea Yates had problems that might have led her to being an offender, the pregnancy and the number of children she had within the few years of marriage was a major cause.
Although the homicide rates have been increasing from the 1950s both in the White and African American communities, the rate of increase in the African American community has been at higher levels.
Some of these theories trace the cause of crime to the individual who first weighs the negatives and positives of a criminal act.
The characteristics of Godse, the motive, and his actions will be looked at to establish the conditions of the case. On that day, Gandhi was getting prepared to unveil his plans to the congress, and [...]
The court correctly ascertained that the images that Werner Brothers utilized were not similar in any way to the images used on the cover page of the novel.
Although there was nobody in the house, some evidence linking the suspect to the murder case was seized by the police during the house inspection.
The main goal is to make it known that the problem is extreme in the rural areas and urge the law enforcement agencies to utilize the existing law to solve the problem.
Ex-offenders do encounter a lot of psychological and social challenges in their attempt to reenter the community. This in return causes a lot of humiliation and embarrassment to the ex-offenders.
Attachment is a legal practice through which a court of law, followed by the appeal of a creditor, entitles particular property possessed by the debtor to be reassigned to the creditor, or vended for the [...]
The ACLU iterates that MCSO deputies are in the habit of "sacrificing the rights and well-being of workers in the name of immigration enforcement".
When the police engage in racial profiling mistrust between the public and the police arises. The causes of such mistrust may be due to poor communication between law enforcement individuals and community members due to [...]
Perre, with the other potato growers, litigated Apand for the "economic loss" they had borne owing to the loss of the right of entry to the Western Australian market.
In this case, arresting children is the only way to get rid of child-sex tourists. Therefore, the only effective way of dealing with this problem is to take lawful actions against those involved in child-sex [...]
This paper will discuss the role of the internet in the spread of child pornography. Before the popularity of the internet in the 1980s, child pornography was rare and unheard of.
As noted earlier, a fire investigator is the most important person in the process of fire investigation and the law requires an investigator to adhere to the best work practices throughout the process.
On the other hand, the legislature has the mandate to formulate laws for the sake of citizens because they are representatives of the people; thus, judicial review of laws, which are passed by the legislature, [...]
As a matter of fact, there was no evidence to prove that the inclusion of the implied term in the contract was a professional custom in the insurance sector.
In the ruling, WCJ observed that the injury occurred in the course and context of employment in Cubic Applications Inc, and thus, deserve compensation.
The results of this study showed that the treatment intervention is effective in not only reducing crime and delinquency, but also in minimizing the prevalence of teenage pregnancy and welfare dependency among participants who successfully [...]
The facts of the case show that the juvenile is a first offender and is yet to attain the minimum age for criminal prosecution according to the state's juvenile justice system.
The experiences of Kuwait and the UAE are yet to demonstrate the consequences of the extreme expansion of DNA retention system, but another country has also provided some information for the consideration in the worldwide [...]
I conclude that we are not ready to lift the restrictions, but the improvement of the quality of life in prisons and the control over ethics in research might allow us to consider changes.Dr.
But criminal victimologists continue to investigate the problems of victim-offender interactions, individual characteristics of victims within and outside of the context of a committed crime, relation of victims to latent criminality, etc.
It will also look at the role of the parent in helping the system to correct such behavior and the stance that is taken by the juvenile system where the parents are uncooperative in that [...]
The apparent issue that is related to PB is the fact that it is "outside the shadow of valid law". PB is a valid tool that is being used to maximize the positive outcomes for [...]
The case includes the analysis of an example of a pretextual stop that led to the detection of drug traffickers and the subsequent appeals to the pretextual nature of that stop.
In addition, it will also include other related issues brought about by stop and frisk, including the right to stop and frisk, reactions from the community, cases and other issues of interests, as well as [...]
The fact that the crime was conducted in the house of accused ones is the probable cause to search and seize evidence.
Thus, understanding comfort and discomfort will aid the interviewer in uncovering the disguise of an individual that is trying to give untruthful answers to simple questions posed by the interviewer.
The study also assesses the significance of the chapter, critically evaluates the content, and makes a proposition of a present theory being expanded to tackle and give details of the rising and future inclinations as [...]
It is the assumption of this paper that a baby market may be a better alternative to the current system that often does not meet demand and contributes to instances of abortion due to the [...]
Exchange, on the other hand, refers to the promises made by both parties in the process of fulfilling the requirements of the contract.
It is imperative to mention that the prominence of wrongful convictions in a topic that is frequently discussed by scholars and has led to many disagreements.
In such a way, the differences in the research study, as well as formulating a research question affect the degree to which group, mailed, face-to-face, telephone, and web research can have certain advantages over the [...]
Law enforcement agencies need to have specific protocols that assess psychological needs of all police officers who are likely to be involved in shootings.
The new photo-shopped work does not in any way affect the marketing of the original work considering that each of the two works has its own market.
One of the reasons for the selection of this theory is that it looks into the influence of crime through poverty in the urban cities such as in Canada and the people who undertake criminal [...]
At the onset of the industrial revolution, public awareness concerning the fair and ethical treatment of children in workplaces emerged. The role of supervising and guiding children is left to other children, grandparents, or hired [...]
The salon will be strategically located in Oregon, US, and will specialize in the provision of hair care and styling services.
It is not a secret that health insurance is one of the most sensitive topics in the workplace, as employees are insured with the help of employer-sponsored medical insurance every year.
Second, employers should be allowed to hire replacement workers not only to maintain the balance of relative bargaining power between the companies and the labor unions but also to reduce labor costs.
That is beside the requirements outlined in the act on how organizations should implement and comply with each section of the act to adhere to the law.
The benefits of adopting the act form the specific area of study, leading to the question of, what benefits inspired corporate entities to adopt the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?
Although the health care law adds benefits to assist in making the Medicare prescription drug coverage more affordable upon reaching the Medicare Part D coverage gap, vulnerable populations have often fallen into what is commonly [...]
The role of the Department of Juvenile Justice is to use appropriate approaches that have the potential to support the needs of every child.
In the case of Sally, her employment contract should also contain the information about the probation period specifying that it will be at the start of employment and as a trial period for three months. [...]
As such, it focused on determining whether the two provisions in the CDA criminalizing the display of 'obscene' and 'patently offensive' online materials violated the First Amendment. That is, the constitutionality of the law restricting [...]
This way, the staff will be able to understand the values of the organization and the consequences of not conforming to the values.
The treatment for both is also set accordingly a violent offender is taught to control emotions and practice techniques that help analyze the degree of stress, while a sexual offender is meant to change the [...]
Available literature demonstrates that the solitary confinement approach is predicated upon the ideological mindset that the fundamental objective of the prison system is no longer to assist in the rehabilitation of prisoners, but rather to [...]
Public records are quite reliable when police officers need to verify information gathered from a scene of the crime, as well as streamline the whole process.
The tax of the $11,000 fees paid to the attorney by Sarah is a fixed amount hence no deductions will be made on the value.
It is the responsibility of any government to ensure that each and every employee is satisfied with the conditions of work so that the employee can deliver to the maximum.
In effect, one of the main plans that I would put in place to ensure that the work is done effectively is to improve the morale of the staff.
Jail is among the institutions that are used to help address the problem of crime and criminal activities. Jail is a small lock-up place that is used to hold offenders for a brief moment.
Arlene Mitchel is viewed as a primary initiator of the fight, and the second woman can be referred as an opponent in the risen conflict. Nonetheless, the occurrence of the fight has to be reported [...]
The fifth one includes the targeted issues while the sixth indicates the decisions and actions. It is also appropriate to be aware of the speech mode of the individual being interviewed.
The following paper addresses the Act from the perspective of its constitutionality, the measures applicable to judges caught in misconduct and the terms of judges' removal, as well as the terms of appointment.
For example, if a person has a bank account in a particular state, then he or she is under the jurisdiction of this state's court.
The local government in Atlanta can be compelled by the court to justify the zoning ordinance if Irene Lopez can demonstrate that it has caused financial losses and contradicts public interest.
This discussion examines the issue of whether some powers of the Congress should be given to individual states and whether states' powers comprising the health, welfare, and morality of the people should be addressed to [...]
In other words, it is believed to be critical that the power capacity is equally spread within the country, and the minority has the same right to shape the decision making process as the majority.
This case was rather complicated, and it started with the class action suit that was filled by twenty children who did not receive an opportunity to enter the school that was near their homes because [...]
According to the traffic law, the relevant organization is supposed to be the source of all traffic laws and law enforcement on all roads, paved and unpaved in the United States.
The primary purpose of the paper is to provide the in-depth analysis regarding a possible decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the case Brown v.
Therefore, the court also considered the other aspects of the given case and initiated the deep investigation of the concerns related to the relations between Ms.
The initial version of the United States Constitution included the provisions that granted authority to the three independent branches of government: the legislative, the judicial, and the executive.
The paper would discuss the incidence of corruption in the workplace. In her locker, she had left the names of the officials she was working with in her scheme.
The police officer had the choice to take the children to a juvenile center home and arrange for a person to take care of the baby and then take the woman to jail as she [...]
It is made up of programs and ideals which are effective in treatment of the offender, reintegrating them in the society and limiting them from committing similar offenses. In conclusion, though most prevention programs are [...]
One of the core aspects that should not be disregarded is that such programs may be used as a particular assessment tool that would help to identify needs of a juvenile, and this approach may [...]
Stewart was aware that the information she had been given by Faneuil about the sale was in contravention of the duties of confidence and trusted the stockbroker owed to the company and its clients.
Burglary, in contrast, is a property crime in that the offenses are categorized as criminal activities against property and do not have to involve harming another person. It is vital to distinguish the intention of [...]
It is evident that, although the three types of murderers may have different characteristics and motivations, their acts amount to a criminal offence of first-degree murder which is normally punishable by death or life imprisonment.
On the next level are the directors of the office of operations, office of special operations, and office of administrative services.
That is why it is now illegal for the officers to conduct a warrantless search if they are convinced that any time wastage would jeopardize their ability to succeed in making an arrest.
To analyze the mechanism of rehabilitation system, this research will study the reasons for the difficulties in reintegration, the methods of facilitating it, and the relationship between the two aspects.
The states elaborate and adopt the laws meant to fight organized crime and gangs and prevent their violence. As well as in the criminal organizations, the gangs are constituted of leaders and their subordinates.
Accelerating the processing of juvenile offenders helps the court to accomplish the objective of early intercession and rehabilitation. Butts et al.maintain that it is important to have immediate punishment on the offenders to shape the [...]
The final duty of the Intake officer is to determine whether it would be safe to release the juvenile or not.
It is the success of the institution in protecting the law that must be the highest motivation for a police officer to regulate his actions.
It is necessary to understand that a defense attorney would get a lot of valuable information during the intake hearing, and would have a better understanding of a particular case and expectations of the client.
The use of developmental theories in the design of crime prevention programs can be viewed as a significant breakthrough and an essential step forward as it permits the design of a set of correct behavioral [...]
Actual cause is when the actions and conduct of the defendant are the direct cause of the injuries suffered by the plaintiff.
There are three parties involved in the situation: the victim, the offender, and the company. At the same time, the involvement of Police Officers to the case and the necessity to carry out their daily [...]
First and foremost, one should note that one of the most typical ethical concerns in the relevant field is the cases of discrimination on the ground of the national origin.
The difference between the powers of an intake officer and a juvenile judge is that a judge decides in court while an intake officer supervises the process of rehabilitation.
Access to such a database should only be for law enforcement and members of the criminal justice system since juveniles should not be considered under the same criminal classification as adults due to the potential [...]
That is why this paper's objective is to explore different views on how the factors of race and culture can influence the violent and criminal behavior in people, to analyze the evident correlations between the [...]
According to the results of the cross-examination, Lisa did not have problems with perceiving reality: at the moment of the crime, she knew that she was killing a woman to cut the child out of [...]
Under common law, the definition of hire purchase is to the effect that the buyer hires the goods for a price with an option of purchasing the goods or terminating the agreement.
To understand the applications of the ETOPS rule, it is important to have a review of its evolution over the years.