Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 3

In the above case, the director of the audit department gets an anonymous tip regarding the activities of the plant controller.

In all states of the United States, it is illegal to drive under the influence of alcohol beyond the set limit per state, according the countries legal definition, drunk driving is driving when one has [...]

The main reason for imposing tariffs is to put a ceiling on the supply of foreign sugar from the United States' market which causes the domestic price of sugar to rise, the tariff effect has [...]

The paper will examine the background of the case in addition to the legal point at issue and the decision of the court.

The arguments for the capital punishment as explained earlier are also extremely weak and the practice of death penalty is morally wrong.

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

Modern scholars have been interested in a wide range of attributes that have the potential to influence their behaviors, such as the chemicals found in the brain and neurotransmitters.

The Supreme Court inquired in the case whether Kent had a say in the juvenile court's investigation to waive jurisdiction and if it adhered to the right to due process.

The real issue before us is whether we should replace the doctrine of joint and several liability with one in which the liability of codefendants to the plaintiff is apportioned according to each defendant's respective [...]

He was accused of breaking the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1974 and money laundering by the U.S.attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.

Toby Crouse, a defense expert, testified that Kahler had briefly "lost control" at the period of the incident and that he did not choose to kill his family members in a reasoned manner because of [...]

With the support of various friends, the plaintiff was able to raise enough money to buy the Harrier Plane and mailed a form to the respondent demanding the plane.

I request the court acknowledge that the conflict between Sarah Celeb and the magazine Star Weekly that published information from her diary stolen without her permission violates Plaintiff's privacy rights by posting the information from [...]

In the three-tier court system, there are the trial courts, the first appellate courts, and the U.S. Thus, the three-tier court system consists of a regional court, an appellate court, and a supreme court.

Williams became the main suspect of the young girls' abduction after a young boy confessed to have seen him at the YMCA packing his car a large bundle of clothes with "skinny and white legs" [...]

California is a landmark case on the issue of search and seizures as stipulated in the Fourth Amendment. The officer is justified to search within the immediate control of the offender for safety reasons and [...]

The main objective is to ensure that the perpetrator is apprehended and convicted for the crime committed. This paper gives an overview of criminal profiling that includes types of profiling done in the United States [...]

The agreement by the acceptor to be bound by the terms of the proposal creates a legally binding contract. There was no valid communication of the acceptance up to the stipulated time.

The frustration-aggression theory shows that a human inability to achieve a goal, the necessity to block feelings, emotions, and needs, and live with frustration and dissatisfaction may cause violence and inappropriate behavior; the case of [...]

However, Frigaliment Importing Corporation was dissatisfied, arguing that the chicken received from the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the contract, citing that the term "chicken" was only used to mean "young chicken".

From 1970s, legislators passed laws to increase the severity and certainty of punishment as a result of the conservative views on crime.

It is imperative to note that some of these theories are swallowed up in the initial five, and so for the purposes of this paper, only the fundamental aspects of these theories will be discussed.

The rights to property and land in the Muslim world are affected not only by internal structure of the society but also by external forces which take the form of human rights organizations and development [...]

The second pinnacle to the classical theory also advances the fact that people have the will to control the variables that characterize their personality. The strain theory advances the fact that social structures in society [...]

Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed [...]

The legal process involves the police, who are responsible for investigating crimes and making the arrest of the offenders. Punishment of offenders is also meant to rehabilitate the individuals to abandon the old habits and [...]

Additionally, it has been hoped that private international law is the best means to alleviate complex issues in disputes such as those involving the use of the Internet.

Thus, a DNA match corroborates the fact that the suspect was at the scene of the crime and this evidence can help in establishing a case against the suspects.

MacCormick states that to understand a case law is the same as understanding how that particular decision by particular judges about particular parties to particular cases can be used in making of the general rule [...]

The fear also drives others to getting to know the serial killers better and trying to find out why they commit the acts.

When it comes to studying a case of crime, no matter the level of severity, nothing is more important to a criminal investigator than the use and implementation of forensic science.

The security management and occupation health and safety officers recommend risk assessment of the possibility of violence and provide possible measures and programs that may significantly assist in the prevention of their occurrence of workplace.

Due to the important role of Fatwa in shaping peoples conduct and bringing human action into the sphere of fiqh, Fatwas will always remain a significant influence in the development of Islamic law and jurisprudence.

Another thesis attributes the differences between the Canadian and the American constitutions to the differences in religious beliefs among the people who live in the two countries.

In conclusion, if the employers are unable to keep guns out of the workplace, then the situation can worsen having seen the trend and incidences of homicides at the workplace as a result of gun [...]

S, the four major accrediting bodies include the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board, the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Forensic Quality Services, and the American Board of Forensic Toxicology, though each body [...]

The court case of the appellant in the face of the People of the State of New York and the respondent in the face of Bernhard Goetz was argued and decided in the year 1986.

In the course of juridical procedures, the US Courte of Appeals in the Sixth Circuit supported the constitutionality of drug testing procedures held in school.

It is the duty of the investigating officer to advise the subject that constrained responses would not be admissible in future hearings by a jurist.

For a forensic scientist, it is paramount to be able to perform the three main functions: Gathering evidence finding the evidence from the crime scene that might be relevant to the case, and collecting it [...]

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the State Supreme Court's decision to distinguish the validity of consent to search with and without the presence of another co-inhabitant.

In turn, the Addams' case is also contradictive as the doctor prescribed the medications and it led to the death of the patient.

The paper at hand is devoted to the investigation of the life, personality, and criminal behavior of one of the most notorious American serial killers of 1980s-1990s, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer.

In general, it must be acknowledged that the surveillance systems can make mistakes, although the computers or cameras are not installed to replace people but to help investigators by getting rid of information that is [...]

After reading the article, it is notable that there are awesome highlights explaining the history, development, and evolution of crime in the society.

Putting Farmer in a prison dominated by men without considering her sexual nature and appearance was a clear indication of their negligence of the harm that would befall Farmer.

Internationally, the governing body is the World Intellectual Property Organization, and it is responsible for granting exclusive rights to the owner of the intellectual property for a varying period, according to the type of the [...]

The principle of this case is that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. The NSA's surveillance capabilities do not violate the Fourth Amendment because they are not searches or seizures.

Then, it is needed to peel the tape off and put it on black or white paper, depending on the color of powder used.

Granville's fundamental constitutional right to decide how to raise her daughters was not in any way protected by the court's assumption that it is typically in the children's best interests to spend time with the [...]

The goal of TRAM is to minimize the risk of terrorist attacks and ensure the safety of citizens and organizations. This model is used to identify and evaluate the potential risks of a biological system [...]

In the court, Griffin refused to testify, and according to a prosecutor, the defendant's choice was evidence of guilt. In turn, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt based on [...]

The teacher took the two learners to the school's administrator, who used the teacher's report to search T.L.O.'s purse. The school head finds drugs in the purse, after which the school contacts her mother, who [...]

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

The theory of ethical formalism that is represented in the works of Immanuel Kant and John Rawls argues that "the only thing truly good is goodwill, and that what is good is that which conforms [...]

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

In the first part, Contreras situates the participants in the historical context of New York and the South Bronx, the epicenter of the rise of the crack-cocaine trade.

At the beginning of the video, the presenter smashes a bloodstain with a hammer and says, "there we go," with relief.

However, poverty may be regarded as the most substantial cause of the majority of crimes as it indirectly leads to non-compliance with the law in multiple ways.

This theory states that "crime occurs when there are not enough legitimate opportunities for people to achieve the success goals imposed by the society".

On the other hand, one of the major downsides of the indeterminate system is that it gives the parole board much too much power, which can lead to discriminatory rulings.

The given case will be analyzed from the perspective of Agnew's General Strain Theory, which was built upon the ideas of Merton's Strain Theory. Agnew's general strain theory fails to explain the magnitude and range [...]

However, the key point lies in the fact that there is a myriad of reasons and factors that can affect a person and lead them to commit acts of delinquency.

However, the court found no evidence on the part of the respondent to utilize Mars goodwill in its Maltesers products. The trademark infringement claim was also dismissed on the basis that the public could not [...]

On the contrary, if the intercourse or the penetration is done without the consent of the victim, the act becomes a rape case.

The clinical laboratory operations within a given country are driven by a set of ethical conduct, which the researchers and laboratory technicians are expected to observe. In managing the laboratory activities, there is a need [...]

Investigation officers be committed to obligation of ensuring that the bodily, social and mental health of a person participating in an investigation is not harmful distressed.

In particular, comparative criminology was formed, the main purpose of which is to consider and study the similarities and differences in crimes of different countries and cultures.

Aileen Wuornos began her series of murders in 1989. For a short period, she killed seven people, and all of them were men.

Selfish ambitions of people are dangerous to the organization because this will lead to the downfall of the company in the long run as it happened with Enron.

The Act regulates the name of the goods, the correspondence of their features with the initial description, the quality of goods, their fitness for the stated purpose, and the actions regarding goods sold in sample.

The final duty of the Intake officer is to determine whether it would be safe to release the juvenile or not.

The general premise for most of these theories is that social factors have a great influence in the development of antisocial and criminal traits. The biosocial theory incorporates interdisciplinary information to a solitary and rational [...]

'An insured's duty of disclosure under the Common Law and the Insurance Contracts Act 1984' Under section twenty one of the 1984 Insurance Contacts Act, all customers are required to make a disclosure to the [...]

In reality, based on the ghastly consequences of his actions and "teachings", he is generally considered a pathological liar, a shrewd manipulator and a man guilty of not only coercing others to murder in his [...]

A mediator is a person who is trained to help dispute parties to come to a fair agreement, he/she must be of a character that is respectable by the parties.

In case there are two applicants for the same patent right, the European patent Authority and Japan Patent Authority offer the right to the first applicant and not the applicant who claims to have made [...]

In addition to the murder and involuntary manslaughter charges, the jury also charged the individual and corporate defendants with reckless conduct. Secondly, the defendants argued that the murder charges were inconsistent with the involuntary manslaughter [...]

In this case the old contract is discharged and there is a substitution of anew contract By vicarious performance: It is open to the parties to have their contract performed vicariously by another person, provided [...]

The approach of offer and acceptance in business law is focused on the determination of agreement existence between two parties; it is a kind of contract between the 'offeror' and 'offeree' built on the principles [...]

This paper will review the evidence and ethical implications of the punishment and correction relationship in the United States and examine the ethics of incarceration in relation to the alternative methods of punishment.

If hunting is the primary means of survival of a particular society, the euthanasia of the elderly and the sick can be deemed acceptable.

It is up to the states and school boards of the district to determine the level of appropriateness in free speech and impose reasonable sanctions for circumstances such as this for purposeful use of offensively [...]

The simplest option is to take a sample from the suspect and compare it with the DNA found at the crime scene.

The penalty was justified that the victims of the pollution were granted relief and despite the fact that nothing could be done regarding the contamination in past events, the court ordered the sites to be [...]

Some of the illegal leisure activities within our present-day world comprise engaging in pornography, excessive consumption of alcohol and smoking. The third illegal leisure activity is the smoking of cigarettes and engaging in drug abuse.

The solution is in understanding the nature of the company. Law defines limited liability company as "a legal person with limited liability.whose statutory capital is divided into shares".'Piercing the corporate veil' is the theory that [...]

In the television shows and films examined in this paper, the creators attempt to display various aspects of the criminal justice system realistically and positively.

Hence, according to Lopez and Gillespie, tenets of the social disorganization theory have been resourceful in the present-day juvenile delinquency system.

However, the law allows a minor to enter into contracts for the supply of necessities if no adult can provide the necessities.

After the ruling in the district court, the plaintiff pursued the matter to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal sustained the decision of the district court and affirmed that CBS Broadcasting was entitled [...]

In recent years, the assessment of the risk of violence has been one of the most discussed issues in the medical and legal community.

To evaluate the competency of a defendant, the forensic psychologist is guided by the scientific principles espoused in the field of psychological science.

Cultural Deviance theory is based upon two other theories, which are: Social Disorganization Theory Strain Theory Social disorganization theory focuses on the environment and places it as the main reason for crime.

Because hate crimes are associated with the violation of the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association, it is believed that the motive for hate crimes is a crime itself.

In the year 1983, the company signed an agreement with the producer about the production of the movie. In the contract, it was agreed that Bernheim was to be the director of the film.

Vespermann et al.allege that the aviation industry has signed numerous Open Skies deals and enhanced the status of the present Air Services Agreements as a way to improve the general connectivity of the country.

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

It further supports the view that the purchase of an item for which an author has copyright only transfers the ownership of the item to the person and it does not transfer the economic or [...]

This entrenches the belief that alcohol is appropriate in the minds of the young people increasing the likelihood of repeated behavior.

As the director of the county juvenile court, the research question related to the problem at hand should state as follows: What are cost effective methods of solving the proliferation of violent street gangs in [...]

Before coming up with ways and measures of curbing identity theft that may be targeted on the executives, it is necessary to identify the modes and means by which the theft may be executed.

One reason that motivates people to download copyrighted material from the internet is the lack of a moral justification to prevent this practice.

As such, I agree that the digital era has presented a fair deal of challenges to copyright to the extent of making it obsolete. The profit that is accrued is not shared to the copyright [...]

After the enforcement of the automobile exception in 1925, courts recognized the difference between the searches of buildings and searches of ships, automobiles and wagons which can be quickly moved from the location before the [...]

To begin with, it has been observed from recent studies that have been conducted that majority of American citizens are in complete agreement that texting while one is driving should be banned as it is [...]

A team of highly skilled people is charged with the responsibility of drafting statutes on behalf of the legislature before they can be passed to the courts for interpretation. There are several advantages that may [...]

They also set minimum wages that any employees must be paid and also promote the rights of employees in the workplace Environmental protection seeks to promote environmental friendly operations in the workplace while legal protection [...]

The survival of any civilization hinges on the establishment of laws and codes of conduct and the subsequent obeying of the same by the society's members.

The final version of the bill is agreed upon after the debate and members of both the senate and the house then subject it to a vote.

To prevent and lessen the frequency of mass shootings and other forms of community violence, the current gun laws in the United States need to be updated, made harsher, and regulated more intensely.

Thus, the basis of the air rights in New York City is the zoning and the assignment of a specific high for buildings based on the area where the construction takes place.

The essential facts supporting Lambert's position were the execution of the transfer of documents that required his review. Lambert talked about his obligations, the timing of the services, and their cost, which may confirm the [...]

The issue for determination is if actions that have a negative impact on the profits of the business constitute a breach of fiduciary duty, even though the partnership agreement does not specifically ban such behavior.

In particular, according to the TechFite case, one example of a breach of duty of care might be the insufficient attention of the Security Analyst to the operations of the Application Division, which has led [...]

The proposal seeks to establish the relationship between single parenthood and the increase in juvenile delinquency. I propose addressing child delinquency from the perspective of social and family background to understand the risks associated with [...]

The characters in the story are the peasant Khun-Anup, the vassal of the high steward, Nemtynakht, the high steward Rensi, and King Nebkaure.

To begin with, it is necessary to outline the primary purpose of the MOU agreement for both the health agencies and pharmacies in order to define whether the procedure itself has any benefit for the [...]

He was part of the team that worked in the campaign of the Republican governor of Washington, who later rewarded him with a recommendation letter.

In the context of law enforcement, a gratuity is a gift to operating officers based on their occupation. However, there is a blurry line between tips, gratuity, and bribes, and it is the main argument [...]