Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 4

A judge may impose a penalty on the perpetrator according to the severity of the crime. In such instances, a convicted must pay a certain amount of money to the court.

The clinical laboratory operations within a given country are driven by a set of ethical conduct, which the researchers and laboratory technicians are expected to observe. In managing the laboratory activities, there is a need [...]

The juvenile justice system was established in 1899 for the purpose of providing a lenient atmosphere where juveniles could be tried.

Evan Miller lived in a trailer with his alcohol and drug-addicted mother and stepfather, who were abusing the boy. In 2012, the Court in the case of Miller v.

The Affordable care Act, passed in 2010, intended to make healthcare a right for all workers in medium and large organizations.

It is noted also that Mohamed rejected the police demands and "continued to advance on the victim and was shot by officers".

The cause and effects of young person offending and the state of Victoria's youth justice system have become a subject of broad debate after a series of violent cases in justice centers.

In particular, comparative criminology was formed, the main purpose of which is to consider and study the similarities and differences in crimes of different countries and cultures.

The Principles of Professional Ethics for the Intelligence Community is a collection of rules that assists people working in the intelligence sphere to guide their ethics.

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

The supplier will vend, transport and bring to the purchaser in the month of July 2012 the following property. The purchaser will accept the property and deposit a sum of 750,000.

An offer is an expression of readiness to contract on explicit set of terms that is prepared by the offeror with the intension that if the offer is accepted, the offeror becomes bond by the [...]

The SEC continued with the investigation in 2003 and its main concern was whether Scrushy's stock sale was linked to the Company posting a huge loss.

The diffuse model is implemented by all the courts of general jurisdiction without the creation of a specialized body of the judicial review.

However, the social ecology of crime and its effect on the victims can be analyzed from the standpoint of the different theories of victimization in order to anticipate and limit the possible negative outcomes for [...]

The reason behind this is that the owners of the business would pass the cost of labor to the consumers. Generally, bargaining power in the public sector is higher compared to that in the private [...]

The fact that violence is extremely widespread in gang members' everyday life and the need to protect themselves from rivals result in the prevalence of firearms among gangsters. It should be noted that the internal [...]

According to the defense side of the case, the warrant that was obtained by the detectives only covered the investigation on the residence. For instance, they collected the evidence without a search warrant.

To understand which form of justice is most appropriate in the case of Julio Blanco Garcia, it is necessary to analyze peculiarities of the three forms of justice and apply them to the case.

Tonry's goals of explaining the main underlying processes of American penal policymaking and the adverse effects of irrational decisions driven by the moral panic and the politicians' inclination of gaining authority among the potential voters [...]

This is because the industry has such a long bureaucracy that makes the efficient management of the organization very complicated due to the decentralization processes.

During business interactions, an agent must disclose the identity of a principal only if the third party is aware that he is working for the principal and have knowledge of the principal's identity.

The creation of a bureaucratic structure usually becomes important when the activities expand and the necessity to control the enterprise through the use of rules, hierarchy, specialization and the desirable means of communication while the [...]

This paper discusses the role of sadism and sadistic fantasy in sexual murders, with a view to clearly illuminate the psychological and criminal factors that come into play to drive individuals with sadistic fantasies into [...]

The British Crime Survey's main purpose is to check the crime level and the number of affected people in England. The investigation performed by the British Crime Survey is in the form of an interview, [...]

A mediator is a person who is trained to help dispute parties to come to a fair agreement, he/she must be of a character that is respectable by the parties.

Hoying fully acknowledging the violation of writing to the victim, which is in violation of the civil protection order asked Ms.

When a court uses a professional juror in providing decisions to cases in the court, less time is likely to be spent in coming up with the decisions. Hiring a professional juror is likely to [...]

Islamic law can be categorized into two portions; the Shari'a which is made up of the legal verses of the Koran and the Sunna; and the fiqh which is the interpretation of these verses that [...]

When it comes to studying a case of crime, no matter the level of severity, nothing is more important to a criminal investigator than the use and implementation of forensic science.

It should be emphasized that the necessity to protect the intellectual property fully depends on the aims and requirements of the intellectual property owner, and the entire policy of the company on the matters of [...]

The DOL sued Wal-Mart for failing to pay time-and-a-half pay to its workers when they worked in excess of 40 hours per week.

The crime and its implications has to be made understood to each and every citizen of the nation right from the stage he or she starts getting the feel of the society and things that [...]

S, the four major accrediting bodies include the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board, the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Forensic Quality Services, and the American Board of Forensic Toxicology, though each body [...]

As the review of self-defense, provocation, and diminished responsibility revealed, they refer to different circumstances in which full or partial defense may be given to an accused who committed a homicide unintentionally.

Despite Shameless being all-age encompassing when displaying non-conventional behavior, its display of youth attempts to present their debauchery and non-conformism in a dual light through the creation of an empathetic narrative.

Breetzke and Cohn, for instance, apply the theory to burglaries in the gated communities of South Africa which became popular in the region due to the rising rates of violence and crime.

Although the cultures of the UK and the US have a lot in common due to the shared historical legacy, the approaches that the legal system within each state uses toward the described information types [...]

They include the explanation of physical evidence to identify purposes, the discussion of the differences between class and individual characteristics of physical evidence, and the evaluation of the class characteristics' importance.

The nanny state is a term that describes the overriding influence of a government or its policies on people's freedom of choice.

The present paper studies the unsolved mystery that is the case of Jonathan Luna, a US federal prosecutor who was found stabbed to death in Brecknock Township stream in 2003. The murder of Jonathan Luna [...]

Opponents of arming teachers have argued that this action would be a distraction since the primary role of teachers is to teach.

The rationale for beginning the investigation is the fact that an informant was confidential and witnessed one of the selling operations conducted by "Armando" and "Patsy". A grand jury of the Court came to the [...]

However, the judge considers the disclosure of the disciplinary records to be irrelevant to the case. However, the Crown specifically stated that the disclosure of these records is not relevant to the case without O'Connor's [...]

There is no obligation for Google to restore the rank of Search King to previous levels or including the website in its search engine.

Rather, it merely stated that the house "may be prepared to sell" and that the letter was not a "firm offer of a mortgage".

The image of the American Dream and the Strain Theory works in reverse as well: if a person fails to possess lots of quantifiable treasure, then the social order will consider him as a disappointment.

When considering the purchase of a car, one must be aware of the legal specifics of the process, as the case of Jim and Laura shows quite clearly.

The model enforces the law through dialogue between the offenders and the law enforcers' agencies. The police and courts are the main bodies in the conflict control model of criminal justice.

The other serial killers presented in the killers list also conform to the stereotypes presented in Fox's and Levin's article. Most of the killers also rape, mutilate, and degrade their victims in order to feel [...]

In order to understand the nature of tort law in this country, it is necessary to begin by analyzing the existing civil law provisions.

One of the core ideas expressed by Chesney-Lind is that girls are highly susceptible to abuse and violent treatment. At the same time, scholars note that girls do not view delinquency as the "rejection of [...]

The common tort liability that can arise in the Coca-Cola Company is product liability. Companies and other business should be aware of the acts that can lead them to gross tort liability.

In the study of criminology, the questions of why, how, and when are important to the understanding of the causation factors of crime.

The high speed of modern life aimed at improving productivity, intensity, and quality of work lead to the premature ageing of the human body, to the growth of the frequency of psychological and physical diseases, [...]

In addition to its use in the identification of crime scenes and collection of evidence samples, light can also be used in analyzing collected samples.

If we connect the theory of relative deprivation to the stratified society and criminology, we will see that the majority of social movements are based on the phenomenon of relative deprivation.

The peculiarity of this procedure is that the arbitrator is the one to resolve the conflict and decide what both parties must adhere to.

The rate of professional crime varies directly with the supply of illegal opportunities, as well as the supply of people and organizations vulnerable or motivated to utilize them whereas the rate and occurrence of the [...]

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

Judges listen to allegations brought by the prosecutors, the attorney defenders, and the testimony of the witnesses and rule whether the evidence is valid or not.

This paper critically explains why the inclusion of duties and responsibilities in an employee's employment contract is fundamental to a productive relationship between the employer and the employee.

Since the very existence of the society is based on compliance with a specific set of regulations, breaking the law must never be regarded as a permissible action; however, the ethical implications that a certain [...]

While procedural law denotes the body of law that prescribes rules, rights, and statutes governing the proceedings of a court of law in criminal, civil and administrative lawsuits, substantive law is basically a statutory law [...]

Breach of duty The second element of negligence is the breach of duty. In this regard, the negligence of a plaintiff is weighed against that of the defendant.

The article gives a detailed account of the case and the outcome of Hernando Washington's trial. Lisa McIntyre does not attempt to justify the actions of Hernando Washington; instead she is more concerned with the [...]

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

The prosecutors have the obligation to use the material evidence to defend the criminal, failure to which, the suspect would seek some lawsuit later. Therefore, the prosecutor is obliged to disclose material evidence in favor [...]

Proponents argue that information about the rape victim should be disseminated in an honest and truthful manner while opponents assert that the identity of rape victims should not be revealed given the serious nature of [...]

In all states of the United States, it is illegal to drive under the influence of alcohol beyond the set limit per state, according the countries legal definition, drunk driving is driving when one has [...]

While harsh punishments appear to offer a solution to the problem, this measure may be detrimental to the welfare of the child in the case where the abuser is its guardian.

The final version of the bill is agreed upon after the debate and members of both the senate and the house then subject it to a vote.

Under the conspiracy element in the Wisconsin Statutes, conspiracy is defined as the agreement or combination of forces by two individuals with the intent of committing a crime.

He argues that the American social structure and its structure of wealth distribution and that dream of achieving the 'American dream' all require crime to maintain social stability in the face of structural inequality.

Stewart and Bacanovic claim that they had a pre-existing agreement to sell the stock when it reached a specific price and that the sale was unrelated to the nonpublic information.

The Thorne family lived in a suburb of Sydney, and the dog hairs were found on Bradley's clothing, which was discovered in a different suburb.

Officially titled the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act remains a key piece of labor legislation in the United States.

The essay demonstrates an understanding of deviance and crime and their association. From this point of view, the societal response to deviant conduct in the modern-day world is featured by the predominance of correlations and [...]

The Ninth Circuit Court's decision to allow the evidence to be used against Kyllo prompted the latter to call for a writ of certiorari.

Without the proper processing and handling of evidence, the forensic value of the proof may be inadmissible to the court or diminish.

The purpose of prison is to assist in reducing the rate of offenses committed in society and lessen daily crimes. In Canada, the Circle of Support and Accountability concept uses a team of skilled volunteers [...]

However, the ICC has the power to sanction these individuals' arrests and bring them before the court, thus championing democracy and the rights of victims.

In other words, the relevance of this problem is explained not only by particular cases of robberies, but also by a potential solution to the issue in terms of reducing the level of crime in [...]

This essay will analyze the main features of the UK law and the differences and similarities between the British and the American law.

The prison system in England and Wales is in crisis because of different constituents, which leads to the deterioration of the prison system.

The Crown appealed these acquittals in the Supreme Court, and in a majority decision, the court agreed to the propositions and convicted the accused with respect to all his counts.

In the case of a fire, it is crucial at the beginning to identify the area affected by the fire, explore the possibilities of access to the disaster location, and, if necessary, take additional measures, [...]

In the court, Griffin refused to testify, and according to a prosecutor, the defendant's choice was evidence of guilt. In turn, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt based on [...]

For example, in order to understand the nature of the crime and the offender's motivations, criminologists and psychologists refer to the police report. The documentation is needed to establish the truth about the case and [...]

The aim of the analysis will be to determine whether there is a relationship between the X-variables and Y-variables as hypothesised.

Similarly, it concerns the freedom of the press of the media, which are protected in the United States of America by the First Amendment.

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

The law defines capacity as the capability to understand and retain information relating to the decision and to weigh it in balance when making a decision.

In the three-tier court system, there are the trial courts, the first appellate courts, and the U.S. Thus, the three-tier court system consists of a regional court, an appellate court, and a supreme court.

According to the legend, the idea of the Act originated when the Congresswoman was interrupted by a loud TV commercial during the family dinner.

Nevertheless, Tate continued with his criminal acts and was sentenced to 30 years in prison for violating the terms of the probation.

These criminals have been exposed to unfavorable conditions in their lives such as violence and poverty and turn to criminal behavior as a coping mechanism.

The United States Supreme Court announced that a person accused of a crime and cannot afford to pay for lawyers to represent them has the right to an attorney. According to the Court, Gideon had [...]

The purpose of the presentation is to review some crime trends in the jurisdiction and provide some commentaries regarding the matter.

The criminal act element characteristically implies obtaining property of another by using a threat to cause harm to the victim. The threat may be related to the victim's health, to property, to the victim's reputation.

The inference from this view is that Charles Hardy did not deprive Teresa Harris of equal rights for employment and was a person who was taught to disrespect women.

The most common reasons for the top crimes committed by women are the convergence of gender roles, the increase in financial pressures for women in households, and the leniency of the criminal justice system towards [...]

The mother claims that the busy life of the husband and father makes him absent from the family mostly. John and Tracy's interests and goals are to get the children's custody.

With the involvement in people's credit activity, it becomes significant that people report instances of identity theft to agencies since identity theft often results in credit abuse.

In a 2019 overview of the fatality rates in the United States, while teenagers drove less compared to all but the oldest people, the number of deaths and crashes associated with them were disproportionately high.

During the specific day that the trial took place, Montresor, the defendant, entered the courtroom for the verdict to be read.

However the Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging reported that texting while driving is a greater distraction than talking to others due to the time eyes are away from the road and the amount of cognitive [...]

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

The central issue that emerges in this case is how to enact the appropriate laws of protecting copyrights and intellectual property on the web to ensure that personal information is not compromised.

He objected to the evidence retrieved from his bedroom, arguing that it was the outcome of an unconstitutional search. The court also concluded that the warrantless search was reasonable because there was a valid reason [...]

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the actions of Taylor and Garret in terms of such felonies as breaking and entering, burglary, and battery.

The aim of the criminal justice system is to convert an offender into a law-abiding citizen, and thus rehabilitation is the best approach in various ways.

A common aspect of deviance is elite deviance which is deviance is committed by the people with authority in the society.

After McDonalds failed to silence the two, it sued them for libel and wanted reparation as part of the settlement. This particular advice was surmised to a single premise that in legal trial touching on [...]

Medical errors are some of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the US, which underscores the importance of the medical liability system in the country.

In the given case, Christopher Watts, a 33-year-old man residing in Frederick, the state of Colorado, was a defendant. Initially, Christopher Watts rejected his involvement in the deaths of his wife and daughters.

It included the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Case's interpretation for extending the protections of the Bill of the Rights to states.

Therefore, the audience can learn that the overall evaluation Archer is making implicates the need to value all people in society and to live morally.

Evidence – any object, item or statement, legally submitted to competent tribunal in order to establish matter of fact under investigation.

This paper aims at analyzing the case of Arizona University from the point of view of ethics and reaching a solution corresponding to the ethical principles, along with discussing alternative perspectives on the subject.